You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The run was completed successfully, and each read was assigned a structural category. However, I’m uncertain about how to interpret some of these categories, particularly those related to strand information, such as “Antisense” and “Intergenic.” Given that my input reads we unstranded cDNA, where both strands of the RNA could be sequenced, would this affect the proportion of “Antisense” reads I observe?
Additionally, I would appreciate any comments on the validity of running SQANTI3 at the read level.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi SQANTI team,
Thanks for developing this tool. I wanted to get some clarification on the output of SQANTI.
I ran SQANTI on my long-read data using the following command:
The run was completed successfully, and each read was assigned a structural category. However, I’m uncertain about how to interpret some of these categories, particularly those related to strand information, such as “Antisense” and “Intergenic.” Given that my input reads we unstranded cDNA, where both strands of the RNA could be sequenced, would this affect the proportion of “Antisense” reads I observe?
Additionally, I would appreciate any comments on the validity of running SQANTI3 at the read level.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions