Dang/add tokenfactory module

[GNaD13]

add module tokenfactory

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1025 (2974771) into main (a76999a) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1025      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.68%   59.79%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        6586     6599      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         3931     3946      +15     
+ Misses       2367     2366       -1     
+ Partials      288      287       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
app/app.go	89.21% <100.00%> (+0.30%)	⬆️
x/wasm/keeper/keeper.go	88.07% <0.00%> (+0.31%)	⬆️

[alpe]

Thank you for your PR!
This code looks like a version that you copied from osmosis.
Although I do understand the demand to have this code available, we should work on a process that includes the Osmosis team as code owners and maintainers.
Please contribute to #911 to discuss and follow up on this.

[GNaD13]

Thank you for your PR! This code looks like a version that you copied from osmosis. Although I do understand the demand to have this code available, we should work on a process that includes the Osmosis team as code owners and maintainers. Please contribute to #911 to discuss and follow up on this.

Thank you for your reviews! @alpe

[faddat]

Hi guys, the osmosis team is well aware that we are using and promoting the token factory code in the ecosystem.

In fact just about everybody that we work with is really keen on this particular pull request

Okay so let me tell you a little bit about the motivation behind this pull request and also tell you like we can maintain it we work with Osmosis we spoke to like everybody about this pull request and basically everybody wants to have the token factory Juno wants to have the token factory, Eve wants to have the token factory, neutron even wants to have the token factory and it just seems an extremely sensible standard.

And yes, it was absolutely copied from osmosis, so that contracts written for osmosis could be compatible in more places that was the explicit intent

[alpe]

@faddat thanks for the additional context! I appreciate the effort and like us to continue the discussion on the issue.
A PR is often pushing a concrete solution while the problem description and motivation can be more inspiring and helpful to come up with different solutions. In this case though it is more about go.mod vs embeding and prioritization of course.