Register upgrade plan for musselnet-v2 #351
Conversation
|
@orkunkl I have modified the target branch as discussed. Please update the "upgrade name". Otherwise looks good 👍 |
app/app.go
Outdated
| @@ -645,3 +645,9 @@ func initParamsKeeper(appCodec codec.BinaryMarshaler, legacyAmino *codec.LegacyA | |||
|
|
|||
| return paramsKeeper | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (app *WasmApp) registerUpgradePlans() { | |||
| app.upgradeKeeper.SetUpgradeHandler("v0.13.1", func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. I would just name this "musselnet-v2" or something like that.
|
I heard some upgrade issues with -rc6 (maybe earlier). It would be good to do some local testing. Once #354 is merged, please rebase on/merge from that one. And it would be good to locally test a (one node) upgrade from the current musselnet version (0.12.0?) to this commit. I would be happy to report any issues to the cosmos sdk team. Or report that this worked without problems as a positive test. |
ethanfrey
changed the title
ethanfrey
force-pushed
the
register-v0.13.1-upgrade-plan
branch
from
37833e2 to
f691528
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## musselnet #351 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 57.19% 57.17% -0.03%
=============================================
Files 33 33
Lines 3453 3456 +3
=============================================
+ Hits 1975 1976 +1
- Misses 1327 1328 +1
- Partials 151 152 +1
|
ethanfrey
force-pushed
the
register-v0.13.1-upgrade-plan
branch
from
109bf3f to
613e645
Compare
|
We will not perform this. |
This change is required to succesfully executing a cosmovisor assisted upgrade. Reference: https://godoc.org/github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/upgrade#hdr-Performing_Upgrades