Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow generators to specify custom compiler TL; #295 #403

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019
Merged

Allow generators to specify custom compiler TL; #295 #403

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019

Conversation

kiritofeng
Copy link
Member

By specifying compiler_time_limit: 60 on the generator_multifile test, Appveyor will actually pass all tests.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #403 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #403      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.42%   77.43%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         129      129              
  Lines        4735     4746      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         3666     3675       +9     
- Misses       1069     1071       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dmoj/generator.py 82.22% <100%> (-3.15%) ⬇️
dmoj/config.py 69.62% <100%> (+0.78%) ⬆️
dmoj/problem.py 91.14% <100%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5d20718...5bfed63. Read the comment docs.

@kiritofeng kiritofeng changed the title Allow generators to specify custom compiler TL; DMOJ/judge#295 Allow generators to specify custom compiler TL; #295 Mar 20, 2019
@kiritofeng kiritofeng closed this Mar 20, 2019
@kiritofeng kiritofeng reopened this Mar 20, 2019
@Xyene Xyene merged commit 0adcffd into DMOJ:master Mar 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants