-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
discovery: generate service name from container tags #31306
discovery: generate service name from container tags #31306
Conversation
774d529
to
5bf0e98
Compare
3c2f3a2
to
19a3b99
Compare
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: c5298c3 Optimization Goals: ❌ Significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.56 | [-0.11, +1.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.24 | [-0.23, +0.70] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.22 | [+0.18, +0.27] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.20 | [+0.07, +0.34] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.17 | [-0.47, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.60, +0.71] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.76, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.12, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.90, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.80, +0.77] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.34 | [-1.06, +0.39] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.14 | [-1.20, -1.08] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -2.17 | [-2.30, -2.05] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | -5.18 | [-8.55, -1.81] | 1 | Logs |
✅ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -7.47 | [-11.27, -3.67] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
5bf0e98
to
7766d9b
Compare
19a3b99
to
24045b4
Compare
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=50096089 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 5940c74 |
24045b4
to
1d7fe79
Compare
750e67b
to
d0aa886
Compare
328aa09
to
0862a2f
Compare
d0aa886
to
3b30785
Compare
48bead3
to
c3d692e
Compare
3b30785
to
c7ab2a3
Compare
c3d692e
to
4adaf8c
Compare
095e2da
to
988a075
Compare
…name-from-container-tag
pkg/collector/corechecks/servicediscovery/module/impl_linux_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
This PR makes service discovery generate service names of containerised services using the container tags.
Motivation
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes