Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Exception Replay] Better communicate non-captured exceptions #5371

Conversation

GreenMatan
Copy link
Contributor

@GreenMatan GreenMatan commented Mar 31, 2024

Summary of changes

In Exception Replay we may fail to capture all the frames of an exception. The reasons vary and could be instrumentation failure (native level), blocklisting, .NET 6+ with non-optimized code, etc - of all the participating frames in the exception stack trace.

To communicate that, a new tag was introduced - _dd.debug.error.<FRAME_NUMBER>.no_capture_reason:<REASON>.
In this PR, I've added this tag for every frame we've failed to capture.

Reason for change

Communicating to the customers why there are no frame data for a given exception.

@GreenMatan GreenMatan requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2024 12:50
@GreenMatan GreenMatan changed the title [Exception Replay] Better communicate exceptions that we fail to capture any frame [Exception Replay] Better communicate exceptions where we fail to capture any frame Mar 31, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) label Mar 31, 2024
@GreenMatan GreenMatan changed the title [Exception Replay] Better communicate exceptions where we fail to capture any frame [Exception Replay] Better communicate non-captured exceptions Mar 31, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Mar 31, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: matang/exception-replay/better-handle-not-captured-exceptions
Commit report: 06c8024
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 332313 Passed, 2056 Skipped, 41m 31.49s Wall Time

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (74ms)  : 64, 84
     .   : milestone, 74,
    master - mean (75ms)  : 67, 84
     .   : milestone, 75,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (1,004ms)  : 978, 1030
     .   : milestone, 1004,
    master - mean (1,000ms)  : 979, 1021
     .   : milestone, 1000,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (110ms)  : 107, 112
     .   : milestone, 110,
    master - mean (110ms)  : 107, 114
     .   : milestone, 110,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (724ms)  : 701, 748
     .   : milestone, 724,
    master - mean (719ms)  : 697, 740
     .   : milestone, 719,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (94ms)  : 91, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 91, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (677ms)  : 654, 700
     .   : milestone, 677,
    master - mean (676ms)  : 654, 698
     .   : milestone, 676,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (187ms)  : 181, 192
     .   : milestone, 187,
    master - mean (188ms)  : 184, 191
     .   : milestone, 188,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (1,067ms)  : 1040, 1094
     .   : milestone, 1067,
    master - mean (1,076ms)  : 1052, 1101
     .   : milestone, 1076,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (270ms)  : 264, 275
     .   : milestone, 270,
    master - mean (271ms)  : 266, 276
     .   : milestone, 271,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (867ms)  : 847, 886
     .   : milestone, 867,
    master - mean (874ms)  : 852, 897
     .   : milestone, 874,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) - mean (261ms)  : 258, 265
     .   : milestone, 261,
    master - mean (261ms)  : 256, 265
     .   : milestone, 261,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5371) - mean (853ms)  : 829, 878
     .   : milestone, 853,
    master - mean (857ms)  : 834, 881
     .   : milestone, 857,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5371 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.146
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.7μs 47.5ns 281ns 0.0342 0.0171 0 7.51 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.6μs 57.5ns 335ns 0.0203 0.0102 0 7.6 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.8μs 45.4ns 164ns 1.36 0.343 0.117 8.06 KB
#5371 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.85μs 49.6ns 325ns 0.0213 0.00854 0 7.5 KB
#5371 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.5μs 56ns 291ns 0.0267 0.0107 0 7.6 KB
#5371 StartStopWithChild net472 17μs 57.9ns 224ns 1.35 0.353 0.121 8.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 481μs 192ns 742ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 610μs 139ns 520ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 813μs 347ns 1.3μs 0.406 0 0 3.3 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 458μs 195ns 757ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 589μs 123ns 461ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 822μs 314ns 1.21μs 0.411 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 173μs 181ns 700ns 0.191 0 0 18.33 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 194μs 247ns 957ns 0.191 0 0 20.49 KB
master SendRequest net472 0ns 0ns 0ns 0 0 0 0 b
#5371 SendRequest net6.0 173μs 231ns 864ns 0.172 0 0 18.33 KB
#5371 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 191μs 390ns 1.51μs 0.189 0 0 20.49 KB
#5371 SendRequest net472 0.00131ns 0.00034ns 0.00127ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 550μs 332ns 1.24μs 0.566 0 0 41.56 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 652μs 1.46μs 5.64μs 0.327 0 0 41.87 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 884μs 3.56μs 13.3μs 8.42 2.66 0.443 53.23 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 556μs 285ns 1.03μs 0.556 0 0 41.47 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 652μs 1.04μs 4.01μs 0.326 0 0 41.78 KB
#5371 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 860μs 3.14μs 12.2μs 8.45 2.53 0.422 53.24 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.13μs 0.293ns 1.1ns 0.0107 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 3.4ns 12.7ns 0.0102 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.82μs 1.54ns 5.95ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
#5371 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.19μs 0.545ns 2.11ns 0.0109 0 0 784 B
#5371 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.5μs 0.704ns 2.73ns 0.0103 0 0 784 B
#5371 ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.8μs 1.19ns 4.46ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.37μs 1.18ns 4.58ns 0.0138 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.5μs 0.727ns 2.82ns 0.0135 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.38μs 2.12ns 7.94ns 0.162 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.29μs 0.602ns 2.33ns 0.0143 0 0 984 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.7μs 0.84ns 3.14ns 0.0145 0 0 1.06 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.65μs 1.8ns 6.75ns 0.171 0 0 1.08 KB
#5371 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.36μs 1.32ns 4.96ns 0.0144 0 0 1.01 KB
#5371 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.6μs 0.511ns 1.91ns 0.0137 0 0 1.01 KB
#5371 CallElasticsearch net472 2.49μs 0.994ns 3.85ns 0.161 0 0 1.02 KB
#5371 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.41μs 0.619ns 2.31ns 0.0134 0 0 984 B
#5371 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.765ns 2.76ns 0.0141 0 0 1.06 KB
#5371 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.62μs 2.33ns 9.04ns 0.171 0 0 1.08 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.38μs 0.639ns 2.48ns 0.0125 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.522ns 1.88ns 0.0124 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.9μs 1.03ns 3.99ns 0.141 0 0 891 B
#5371 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.39μs 1.07ns 4.16ns 0.013 0 0 928 B
#5371 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.64μs 0.633ns 2.45ns 0.0123 0 0 928 B
#5371 ExecuteAsync net472 1.89μs 0.964ns 3.74ns 0.141 0 0 891 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.17μs 3.72ns 14.4ns 0.0309 0 0 2.16 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.16μs 7ns 26.2ns 0.0362 0 0 2.7 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.84μs 1.73ns 6.69ns 0.482 0 0 3.05 KB
#5371 SendAsync net6.0 4.08μs 2.64ns 10.2ns 0.0287 0 0 2.16 KB
#5371 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.09μs 2.48ns 9.59ns 0.0356 0 0 2.7 KB
#5371 SendAsync net472 7.69μs 1.43ns 5.15ns 0.481 0 0 3.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.55μs 0.564ns 2.11ns 0.0229 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.27μs 3.22ns 12.1ns 0.0226 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.58μs 1.7ns 6.12ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.42μs 0.378ns 1.42ns 0.0233 0 0 1.65 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.3μs 3.15ns 11.8ns 0.0229 0 0 1.65 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net472 2.65μs 1.26ns 4.72ns 0.25 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 111μs 80.1ns 310ns 0.0551 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 117μs 191ns 740ns 0 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 147μs 39.3ns 142ns 0.661 0.22 0 4.41 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net6.0 113μs 225ns 871ns 0.0562 0 0 4.23 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 139ns 518ns 0.0589 0 0 4.23 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net472 146μs 77.6ns 301ns 0.658 0.219 0 4.41 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.17μs 1.23ns 4.77ns 0.0303 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.25μs 1.14ns 4.43ns 0.0298 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.92μs 3.05ns 11.8ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.16μs 1.28ns 4.97ns 0.0305 0 0 2.21 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.34μs 2.54ns 9.52ns 0.0301 0 0 2.21 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net472 4.88μs 3.58ns 13.9ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.43μs 1.06ns 3.96ns 0.0165 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.83μs 2.02ns 7.56ns 0.0155 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.24μs 2.52ns 9.76ns 0.187 0 0 1.18 KB
#5371 SendReceive net6.0 1.45μs 0.458ns 1.72ns 0.016 0 0 1.18 KB
#5371 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.85μs 2.59ns 9.68ns 0.0156 0 0 1.18 KB
#5371 SendReceive net472 2.38μs 1.73ns 6.49ns 0.187 0 0 1.18 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.88μs 0.787ns 2.94ns 0.0216 0 0 1.55 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.01μs 2.61ns 10.1ns 0.0221 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.58μs 2.68ns 10ns 0.314 0 0 1.99 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.88μs 1.19ns 4.63ns 0.0218 0 0 1.55 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.91μs 1.31ns 5.08ns 0.0216 0 0 1.6 KB
#5371 EnrichedLog net472 4.22μs 2.14ns 8.28ns 0.314 0 0 1.99 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5371

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net472 1.146 820.15 715.38

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 482ns 0.476ns 1.78ns 0.00766 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 668ns 1.11ns 4.14ns 0.00761 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 820ns 1.67ns 6.45ns 0.0876 0 0 554 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 548ns 0.785ns 2.94ns 0.00935 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 810ns 1.14ns 4.42ns 0.00888 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope net472 917ns 1.31ns 5.09ns 0.1 0 0 634 B
#5371 StartFinishSpan net6.0 503ns 1.06ns 4.11ns 0.00781 0 0 552 B
#5371 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 696ns 1.26ns 4.37ns 0.0075 0 0 552 B
#5371 StartFinishSpan net472 716ns 1.25ns 4.83ns 0.0877 0 0 554 B
#5371 StartFinishScope net6.0 611ns 1.13ns 4.38ns 0.00934 0 0 672 B
#5371 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 780ns 1.47ns 5.7ns 0.00905 0 0 672 B
#5371 StartFinishScope net472 936ns 1.05ns 3.78ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 733ns 0.849ns 3.29ns 0.00937 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 961ns 1.35ns 5.04ns 0.00909 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.05μs 2.21ns 8.57ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
#5371 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 703ns 0.839ns 3.25ns 0.00923 0 0 672 B
#5371 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 926ns 1.93ns 7.46ns 0.00882 0 0 672 B
#5371 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.04μs 3.47ns 13.5ns 0.1 0 0 634 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report:zap:

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) (11.229M)   : 0, 11228937
    master (11.471M)   : 0, 11471077
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.411M)   : 0, 11411052

    section Automatic
    This PR (5371) (7.745M)   : 0, 7744836
    master (7.823M)   : 0, 7823378
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.041M)   : 0, 8040848

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5371) (8.074M)   : 0, 8073905
    master (8.255M)   : 0, 8255091

    section Manual
    This PR (5371) (9.831M)   : 0, 9831276
    master (10.000M)   : 0, 10000339

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5371) (7.307M)   : 0, 7307043
    master (7.405M)   : 0, 7404644

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5371) (6.563M)   : 0, 6563106
    master (6.706M)   : 0, 6706148

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) (9.485M)   : 0, 9484719
    master (9.678M)   : 0, 9677904
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.520M)   : 0, 9520466

    section Automatic
    This PR (5371) (6.663M)   : 0, 6662984
    master (6.483M)   : 0, 6482979

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5371) (6.946M)   : 0, 6945868
    master (6.909M)   : 0, 6909139

    section Manual
    This PR (5371) (8.325M)   : 0, 8325088
    master (8.108M)   : 0, 8108233

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5371) (6.200M)   : 0, 6199922
    master (6.175M)   : 0, 6174670

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5371) (5.739M)   : 0, 5738888
    master (5.672M)   : 0, 5671735

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5371) (8.829M)   : 0, 8828999
    master (8.644M)   : 0, 8644154
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.821M)   : 0, 8820751

    section Automatic
    This PR (5371) (6.133M)   : 0, 6132920
    master (6.087M)   : 0, 6086915
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (6.263M)   : 0, 6262588

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5371) (6.388M)   : 0, 6388252
    master (6.279M)   : 0, 6278610

    section Manual
    This PR (5371) (7.735M)   : 0, 7734790
    master (7.480M)   : 0, 7480304

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5371) (5.787M)   : 0, 5787372
    master (5.849M)   : 0, 5849378

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5371) (5.282M)   : 0, 5282361
    master (5.225M)   : 0, 5224862

Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@shurivich shurivich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@GreenMatan GreenMatan merged commit 11b58cc into master Apr 1, 2024
61 checks passed
@GreenMatan GreenMatan deleted the matang/exception-replay/better-handle-not-captured-exceptions branch April 1, 2024 08:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext milestone Apr 1, 2024
@andrewlock andrewlock modified the milestones: vNext, vNext-v2 Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants