Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If a lot of snapshots have changed, we should check them all #5563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

  • Fix missing integration-change detection for callsite integrations
  • If a lot of snapshots have changed, runn all TFMs

Reason for change

We've had several cases recently (e.g. #5545) where a PR merge has broken master because some tests are not run on the PR. This improves the "risky" detection to try to prevent master breaking so much

Implementation details

We already detect when integration hook points are added or changed, but that was only looking at calltarget previously. This adds support for checking for aspects too (callsite).

Additionally, if there are a lot of snapshot changes (> 100) we also trigger checking other TFMs, as there's a high probability the non-tested TFMs will be impacted

Test coverage

I haven't tested it, easier to observe in the wild and make sure it's working

Other details

@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label May 15, 2024
@andrewlock andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 08:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@kevingosse kevingosse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

100 is totally the right number nods nods

@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented May 15, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/ci/run-all-tfms-in-more-scenarios
Commit report: ff67778
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 336959 Passed, 1565 Skipped, 13h 36m 8.86s Total Time
❄️ 1 New Flaky

New Flaky Tests (1)

  • Finish_StartTimeInThePastWithNoEndTime_DurationProperlyComputed - Datadog.Trace.Tests.SpanTests - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     Assert.True() Failure
     Expected: True
     Actual:   False
    

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (73ms)  : 66, 81
     .   : milestone, 73,
    master - mean (71ms)  : 66, 76
     .   : milestone, 71,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (997ms)  : 967, 1028
     .   : milestone, 997,
    master - mean (993ms)  : 968, 1017
     .   : milestone, 993,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (111ms)  : 108, 114
     .   : milestone, 111,
    master - mean (110ms)  : 107, 112
     .   : milestone, 110,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (710ms)  : 692, 729
     .   : milestone, 710,
    master - mean (700ms)  : 676, 724
     .   : milestone, 700,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (96ms)  : 93, 99
     .   : milestone, 96,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 90, 99
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (655ms)  : 635, 674
     .   : milestone, 655,
    master - mean (655ms)  : 634, 677
     .   : milestone, 655,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (192ms)  : 188, 196
     .   : milestone, 192,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 187, 196
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (1,116ms)  : 1090, 1143
     .   : milestone, 1116,
    master - mean (1,112ms)  : 1090, 1134
     .   : milestone, 1112,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (274ms)  : 270, 277
     .   : milestone, 274,
    master - mean (276ms)  : 272, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (913ms)  : 896, 931
     .   : milestone, 913,
    master - mean (912ms)  : 898, 927
     .   : milestone, 912,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) - mean (264ms)  : 260, 269
     .   : milestone, 264,
    master - mean (264ms)  : 260, 267
     .   : milestone, 264,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5563) - mean (905ms)  : 886, 923
     .   : milestone, 905,
    master - mean (896ms)  : 877, 915
     .   : milestone, 896,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5563 compared to master:

  • 2 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.138
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.84μs 43ns 188ns 0.0305 0.0087 0 7.56 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.9μs 58.9ns 312ns 0.0218 0.0109 0 7.66 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 17.4μs 38.6ns 144ns 1.34 0.325 0.111 8.06 KB
#5563 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.67μs 46.2ns 253ns 0.0252 0.0126 0.0042 7.55 KB
#5563 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.9μs 58.9ns 338ns 0.0304 0.0152 0 7.65 KB
#5563 StartStopWithChild net472 17.4μs 74.5ns 289ns 1.35 0.348 0.0934 8.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 482μs 403ns 1.51μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 639μs 570ns 2.21μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 833μs 654ns 2.53μs 0.417 0 0 3.3 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 476μs 208ns 804ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 621μs 255ns 986ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 831μs 348ns 1.35μs 0.414 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 167μs 129ns 499ns 0.249 0 0 18.49 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 192μs 283ns 1.09μs 0.192 0 0 20.65 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000334ns 0.000156ns 0.000539ns 0 0 0 0 b
#5563 SendRequest net6.0 170μs 150ns 580ns 0.169 0 0 18.49 KB
#5563 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 191μs 290ns 1.12μs 0.192 0 0 20.65 KB
#5563 SendRequest net472 0.00076ns 0.000293ns 0.0011ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 547μs 1μs 3.47μs 0.548 0 0 41.6 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 667μs 1.74μs 6.27μs 0.332 0 0 41.58 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 843μs 4.01μs 16.5μs 8.25 2.6 0.434 53.24 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 539μs 853ns 3.3μs 0.532 0 0 41.6 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 659μs 1.85μs 7.18μs 0.331 0 0 41.55 KB
#5563 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 876μs 3.02μs 11.7μs 8.25 2.6 0.434 53.26 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.13μs 0.583ns 2.26ns 0.0114 0 0 808 B
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.51μs 0.678ns 2.62ns 0.0107 0 0 808 B
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.82μs 0.446ns 1.73ns 0.122 0 0 770 B
#5563 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.11μs 0.706ns 2.64ns 0.0116 0 0 808 B
#5563 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.56μs 1.04ns 3.89ns 0.0109 0 0 808 B
#5563 ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.76μs 0.864ns 3.35ns 0.122 0 0 770 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.29μs 1.47ns 5.7ns 0.0144 0 0 1.03 KB
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.55μs 1.59ns 6.15ns 0.0145 0 0 1.03 KB
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.52μs 1.11ns 4.16ns 0.165 0.00126 0 1.04 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.32μs 0.794ns 3.08ns 0.0143 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.67μs 3.77ns 14.6ns 0.0142 0 0 1.08 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.69μs 1.91ns 7.41ns 0.174 0 0 1.1 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.24μs 1.02ns 3.95ns 0.0142 0 0 1.03 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.6μs 1.29ns 4.99ns 0.0138 0 0 1.03 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearch net472 2.47μs 2.32ns 9ns 0.165 0 0 1.04 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.26μs 0.931ns 3.61ns 0.0138 0 0 1.01 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.7μs 1.31ns 4.89ns 0.0146 0 0 1.08 KB
#5563 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.68μs 1.94ns 7.26ns 0.175 0.00134 0 1.1 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.34μs 0.799ns 3.1ns 0.013 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.68μs 0.765ns 2.65ns 0.0126 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.74μs 0.567ns 2.2ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#5563 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.24μs 0.803ns 3.01ns 0.0137 0 0 952 B
#5563 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.6μs 0.712ns 2.66ns 0.0128 0 0 952 B
#5563 ExecuteAsync net472 1.78μs 1.14ns 4.4ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.18μs 1.19ns 4.62ns 0.0314 0 0 2.27 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.36μs 2.77ns 10.4ns 0.0374 0 0 2.81 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.83μs 3.62ns 14ns 0.504 0 0 3.18 KB
#5563 SendAsync net6.0 4.22μs 4.59ns 16.6ns 0.0319 0 0 2.27 KB
#5563 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 4.98μs 2.21ns 8.26ns 0.0375 0 0 2.81 KB
#5563 SendAsync net472 7.93μs 2.92ns 11.3ns 0.502 0 0 3.18 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5563

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog‑net6.0 1.122 1,612.54 1,436.65

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.61μs 0.332ns 1.29ns 0.0234 0 0 1.7 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.16μs 1.69ns 6.32ns 0.0227 0 0 1.7 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.73μs 2.74ns 10.3ns 0.257 0 0 1.62 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.754ns 2.92ns 0.0237 0 0 1.7 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.23μs 1.02ns 3.8ns 0.0226 0 0 1.7 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net472 2.67μs 2.39ns 9.25ns 0.257 0 0 1.62 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 113μs 193ns 746ns 0.0565 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 121μs 202ns 784ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 151μs 174ns 672ns 0.676 0.225 0 4.46 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net6.0 113μs 231ns 893ns 0.0561 0 0 4.28 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 117μs 110ns 425ns 0.0581 0 0 4.28 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net472 148μs 389ns 1.51μs 0.676 0.225 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.09μs 0.976ns 3.65ns 0.0307 0 0 2.25 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.15μs 1.95ns 7.56ns 0.029 0 0 2.25 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.69μs 1.52ns 5.7ns 0.327 0 0 2.07 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.06μs 0.75ns 2.81ns 0.0307 0 0 2.25 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.18μs 2.49ns 9.31ns 0.0313 0 0 2.25 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net472 4.89μs 1.49ns 5.75ns 0.328 0 0 2.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.33μs 1.12ns 4.33ns 0.0167 0 0 1.2 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.85μs 1.27ns 4.93ns 0.0158 0 0 1.2 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.24μs 0.574ns 2.07ns 0.191 0.00113 0 1.2 KB
#5563 SendReceive net6.0 1.37μs 0.814ns 3.15ns 0.0171 0 0 1.2 KB
#5563 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 1.91ns 7.4ns 0.0162 0 0 1.2 KB
#5563 SendReceive net472 2.31μs 1.05ns 3.92ns 0.191 0 0 1.2 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 1.13ns 4.08ns 0.0221 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.93μs 1.23ns 4.62ns 0.0217 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.55μs 3.5ns 13.6ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.73μs 1.05ns 4.05ns 0.0218 0 0 1.6 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.94μs 3.19ns 11.9ns 0.0217 0 0 1.65 KB
#5563 EnrichedLog net472 4.3μs 4.72ns 18.3ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5563

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.154 631.13 546.95

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 464ns 0.268ns 1ns 0.00815 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 673ns 0.521ns 2.02ns 0.00782 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 779ns 0.48ns 1.86ns 0.0917 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 631ns 0.953ns 3.69ns 0.00985 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 904ns 1.81ns 6.76ns 0.00963 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 1.02μs 0.347ns 1.25ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#5563 StartFinishSpan net6.0 496ns 0.219ns 0.791ns 0.00793 0 0 576 B
#5563 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 680ns 0.371ns 1.39ns 0.00769 0 0 576 B
#5563 StartFinishSpan net472 794ns 0.384ns 1.49ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
#5563 StartFinishScope net6.0 547ns 0.181ns 0.678ns 0.00966 0 0 696 B
#5563 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 859ns 0.414ns 1.6ns 0.00945 0 0 696 B
#5563 StartFinishScope net472 1.01μs 1.11ns 4.3ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 601ns 0.483ns 1.87ns 0.00983 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 990ns 1.37ns 5.29ns 0.00939 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.11μs 0.671ns 2.6ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#5563 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 645ns 0.242ns 0.937ns 0.0097 0 0 696 B
#5563 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 908ns 0.616ns 2.3ns 0.00923 0 0 696 B
#5563 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.21μs 0.846ns 3.28ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member Author

Throughput/Crank Report:zap:

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) (11.881M)   : 0, 11881446
    master (11.862M)   : 0, 11862130
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.817M)   : 0, 11816893

    section Automatic
    This PR (5563) (8.121M)   : 0, 8121168
    master (8.015M)   : 0, 8014959
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.480M)   : 0, 8480079

    section Trace stats
    master (8.328M)   : 0, 8328315

    section Manual
    This PR (5563) (10.393M)   : 0, 10393265
    master (10.258M)   : 0, 10258408

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5563) (7.594M)   : 0, 7593927
    master (7.540M)   : 0, 7540293

    section Version Conflict
    master (6.769M)   : 0, 6769041

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) (9.445M)   : 0, 9444694
    master (9.688M)   : 0, 9688323
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.598M)   : 0, 9597540

    section Automatic
    This PR (5563) (6.638M)   : 0, 6638260
    master (6.554M)   : 0, 6554363

    section Trace stats
    master (6.850M)   : 0, 6849767

    section Manual
    This PR (5563) (8.145M)   : 0, 8144678
    master (8.245M)   : 0, 8245403

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5563) (6.066M)   : 0, 6065729
    master (6.190M)   : 0, 6190348

    section Version Conflict
    master (5.680M)   : 0, 5679678

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5563) (9.856M)   : 0, 9855602
    master (9.781M)   : 0, 9781004
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.041M)   : 0, 10040980

    section Automatic
    This PR (5563) (7.114M)   : 0, 7113852
    master (6.964M)   : 0, 6964106
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.137M)   : 0, 7137430

    section Trace stats
    master (7.347M)   : 0, 7347028

    section Manual
    This PR (5563) (8.799M)   : 0, 8798889
    master (8.809M)   : 0, 8809283

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5563) (6.826M)   : 0, 6826187
    master (6.754M)   : 0, 6754006

    section Version Conflict
    master (6.038M)   : 0, 6038242

Loading

@andrewlock andrewlock merged commit 76a7fc9 into master May 16, 2024
55 of 57 checks passed
@andrewlock andrewlock deleted the andrew/ci/run-all-tfms-in-more-scenarios branch May 16, 2024 07:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v2 milestone May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants