Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Dynamic Instrumentation] Aligned the line probe snapshot to fix System Tests failures #5628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

GreenMatan
Copy link
Contributor

@GreenMatan GreenMatan commented May 30, 2024

Summary of changes

There was a check that was added into the System Test that make sure each field in the snapshot is correctly typed. There was a small gap between .NET and Java snapshots where the line field in Java is a string, and in .NET is an int.

This difference is from earlier design decision that was made, to allow a line probe to be applied to multiple lines (hence be presented as X - Y). This decision was discarded by then, but for backward compatibility reasons with previous library versioning the string is kept.

The changes in this PR aligns with this requirement.

Reason for change

Fix System Tests breakage on improper data type.

@GreenMatan GreenMatan requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2024 11:18
@GreenMatan GreenMatan force-pushed the matang/align-line-probe-lines-data-type branch from 13d2d01 to 51a5ecb Compare May 30, 2024 11:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 30, 2024

Snapshots difference summary

The following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer.
The diff is simplistic, so please check some files anyway while we improve it.

2 occurrences of :

-              21
+              "21"

2 occurrences of :

-              34
+              "34"

6 occurrences of :

-              23
+              "23"

7 occurrences of :

-              25
+              "25"

6 occurrences of :

-              26
+              "26"

3 occurrences of :

-              27
+              "27"

3 occurrences of :

-              28
+              "28"

2 occurrences of :

-              29
+              "29"

1 occurrences of :

-              45
+              "45"

7 occurrences of :

-              46
+              "46"

1 occurrences of :

-              47
+              "47"

3 occurrences of :

-              35
+              "35"

3 occurrences of :

-              36
+              "36"

2 occurrences of :

-              37
+              "37"

2 occurrences of :

-              42
+              "42"

1 occurrences of :

-              10
+              "10"

2 occurrences of :

-              11
+              "11"

2 occurrences of :

-              12
+              "12"

2 occurrences of :

-              70
+              "70"

3 occurrences of :

-              24
+              "24"

1 occurrences of :

-              30
+              "30"

1 occurrences of :

-              31
+              "31"

4 occurrences of :

-              32
+              "32"

2 occurrences of :

-              22
+              "22"

1 occurrences of :

-              16
+              "16"

1 occurrences of :

-              17
+              "17"

2 occurrences of :

-              18
+              "18"

1 occurrences of :

-                                          "pruned": true
+                                          "notCapturedReason": "depth",
+                                          "type": "BigObject",
+                                          "value": "BigObject"
[...]
-                                          "pruned": true
+                                          "notCapturedReason": "depth",
+                                          "type": "BigObject",
+                                          "value": "BigObject"
[...]
-                                          "pruned": true
+                                          "notCapturedReason": "depth",
+                                          "type": "BigObject",
+                                          "value": "BigObject"
[...]
-                                          "pruned": true
+                                          "notCapturedReason": "depth",
+                                          "type": "BigObject",
+                                          "value": "BigObject"

1 occurrences of :

-              20
+              "20"

2 occurrences of :

-              41
+              "41"

3 occurrences of :

-              55
+              "55"

2 occurrences of :

-              56
+              "56"

1 occurrences of :

-              57
+              "57"

1 occurrences of :

-              58
+              "58"

1 occurrences of :

-              59
+              "59"

2 occurrences of :

-    "ddtags": "Unknown",

1 occurrences of :

-              11
+              "11"
[...]
+          "version": 0

1 occurrences of :

-              12
+              "12"
[...]
+          "version": 0

1 occurrences of :

-              39
+              "39"

1 occurrences of :

-              53
+              "53"

1 occurrences of :

-              51
+              "51"

1 occurrences of :

-              64
+              "64"

1 occurrences of :

-              33
+              "33"

1 occurrences of :

-              38
+              "38"

Copy link
Contributor

@shurivich shurivich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented May 30, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: matang/align-line-probe-lines-data-type
Commit report: 7c7586a
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

❌ 35 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 335400 Passed, 2037 Skipped, 21h 59m 40.39s Total Time
❄️ 20 New Flaky

❌ Failed Tests (35)

This report shows up to 5 failed tests.

  • Profiler_allocation - scenarios - Details

    Expand for error
     
     
    
  • Profiler_allocation - scenarios - Details

    Expand for error
     
     
    
  • Profiler_allocation - scenarios - Details

    Expand for error
     
     
    
  • Profiler_allocation_cpu_walltime - scenarios - Details

    Expand for error
     
     
    
  • Profiler_allocation_cpu_walltime - scenarios - Details

    Expand for error
     
     
    

New Flaky Tests (20)

  • ClientDisconnect - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     [Test Class Cleanup Failure (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag)]: System.Net.WebException : The operation has timed out
    
  • SubmitsTraces - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     [Test Class Cleanup Failure (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag)]: System.Net.WebException : The operation has timed out
    
  • SubmitsTraces - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     [Test Class Cleanup Failure (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag)]: System.Net.WebException : The operation has timed out
    
  • SubmitsTraces - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     [Test Class Cleanup Failure (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag)]: System.Net.WebException : The operation has timed out
    
  • SubmitsTraces - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     [Test Class Cleanup Failure (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetMvc4TestsCallTargetClassicWithFeatureFlag)]: System.Net.WebException : The operation has timed out
    

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented May 30, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (72ms)  : 64, 81
     .   : milestone, 72,
    master - mean (73ms)  : 63, 82
     .   : milestone, 73,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (995ms)  : 973, 1018
     .   : milestone, 995,
    master - mean (996ms)  : 974, 1018
     .   : milestone, 996,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (109ms)  : 106, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,
    master - mean (109ms)  : 106, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (712ms)  : 691, 733
     .   : milestone, 712,
    master - mean (712ms)  : 690, 735
     .   : milestone, 712,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (92ms)  : 89, 95
     .   : milestone, 92,
    master - mean (93ms)  : 90, 97
     .   : milestone, 93,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (662ms)  : 638, 685
     .   : milestone, 662,
    master - mean (665ms)  : 641, 689
     .   : milestone, 665,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (192ms)  : 189, 196
     .   : milestone, 192,
    master - mean (192ms)  : 188, 196
     .   : milestone, 192,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (1,096ms)  : 1074, 1118
     .   : milestone, 1096,
    master - mean (1,097ms)  : 1080, 1114
     .   : milestone, 1097,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (278ms)  : 274, 282
     .   : milestone, 278,
    master - mean (277ms)  : 272, 281
     .   : milestone, 277,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (893ms)  : 871, 916
     .   : milestone, 893,
    master - mean (897ms)  : 874, 919
     .   : milestone, 897,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) - mean (267ms)  : 263, 271
     .   : milestone, 267,
    master - mean (268ms)  : 264, 272
     .   : milestone, 268,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5628) - mean (876ms)  : 851, 901
     .   : milestone, 876,
    master - mean (875ms)  : 853, 898
     .   : milestone, 875,

Loading

@GreenMatan GreenMatan force-pushed the matang/align-line-probe-lines-data-type branch from 51a5ecb to 7c7586a Compare May 30, 2024 11:53
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report:zap:

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) (11.477M)   : 0, 11476822
    master (12.119M)   : 0, 12119071
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.934M)   : 0, 11934329

    section Automatic
    This PR (5628) (7.715M)   : crit ,0, 7714940
    master (8.127M)   : 0, 8127212
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.544M)   : 0, 8544145

    section Trace stats
    master (8.573M)   : 0, 8573333

    section Manual
    This PR (5628) (10.014M)   : 0, 10014313
    master (10.412M)   : 0, 10411657

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5628) (7.265M)   : crit ,0, 7265415
    master (7.679M)   : 0, 7678738

    section Version Conflict
    master (6.916M)   : 0, 6916380

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) (9.457M)   : 0, 9456876
    master (9.542M)   : 0, 9542196
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.673M)   : 0, 9672539

    section Automatic
    This PR (5628) (6.630M)   : 0, 6629820
    master (6.484M)   : 0, 6483952

    section Trace stats
    master (6.900M)   : 0, 6899505

    section Manual
    This PR (5628) (8.274M)   : 0, 8273847
    master (8.238M)   : 0, 8238350

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5628) (6.208M)   : 0, 6207729
    master (6.218M)   : 0, 6217649

    section Version Conflict
    master (5.714M)   : 0, 5713748

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5628) (9.829M)   : 0, 9828911
    master (10.207M)   : 0, 10206794
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.886M)   : 0, 9886161

    section Automatic
    This PR (5628) (6.940M)   : 0, 6939976
    master (7.069M)   : 0, 7068638
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.243M)   : 0, 7243023

    section Trace stats
    master (7.363M)   : 0, 7362715

    section Manual
    This PR (5628) (8.537M)   : 0, 8537214
    master (8.863M)   : 0, 8862765

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5628) (6.639M)   : 0, 6638979
    master (6.734M)   : 0, 6734211

    section Version Conflict
    master (6.179M)   : 0, 6179243

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5628 compared to master:

  • 4 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.268
  • 1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.121
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5628

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild‑net472 1.193 21,087.31 17,682.36
Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild‑net6.0 1.189 10,469.43 8,806.42 bimodal
Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild‑netcoreapp3.1 1.188 12,770.21 10,747.12

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 10.5μs 59.9ns 445ns 0.0257 0.0103 0 7.55 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 12.8μs 73.2ns 604ns 0.0253 0.00631 0 7.65 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 21μs 101ns 404ns 1.35 0.364 0.111 8.06 KB
#5628 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.79μs 48.2ns 273ns 0.0212 0.00847 0 7.56 KB
#5628 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.8μs 49.1ns 230ns 0.0277 0.0111 0 7.64 KB
#5628 StartStopWithChild net472 17.7μs 83.3ns 323ns 1.33 0.329 0.107 8.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 503μs 2.57μs 12.3μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 629μs 332ns 1.29μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 845μs 237ns 919ns 0.422 0 0 3.3 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 483μs 149ns 576ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 655μs 259ns 1μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 850μs 150ns 562ns 0.425 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 168μs 230ns 892ns 0.251 0 0 18.44 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 192μs 346ns 1.34μs 0.194 0 0 20.6 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000448ns 0.000218ns 0.000844ns 0 0 0 0 b
#5628 SendRequest net6.0 169μs 282ns 1.09μs 0.169 0 0 18.44 KB
#5628 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 193μs 398ns 1.54μs 0.192 0 0 20.6 KB
#5628 SendRequest net472 0.000222ns 0.000142ns 0.000533ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 558μs 404ns 1.57μs 0.553 0 0 41.59 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 674μs 2.22μs 8.58μs 0.329 0 0 41.66 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 855μs 4.13μs 17.5μs 8.39 2.52 0.419 53.26 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 562μs 533ns 2.06μs 0.548 0 0 41.51 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 657μs 1.47μs 5.69μs 0.331 0 0 41.62 KB
#5628 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 843μs 4.16μs 17.2μs 8.08 2.55 0.425 53.26 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.09μs 0.507ns 1.9ns 0.0114 0 0 808 B
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.49μs 0.86ns 3.33ns 0.0104 0 0 808 B
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.73μs 2.09ns 8.09ns 0.122 0 0 770 B
#5628 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.08μs 0.427ns 1.48ns 0.0113 0 0 808 B
#5628 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.48μs 0.872ns 3.38ns 0.0105 0 0 808 B
#5628 ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.66μs 1.91ns 7.38ns 0.122 0 0 770 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.21μs 0.19ns 0.658ns 0.0138 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 0.428ns 1.66ns 0.0134 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.57μs 0.977ns 3.66ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.22μs 0.813ns 3.15ns 0.0135 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.497ns 1.92ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.58μs 2.01ns 7.79ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
#5628 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.2μs 1.24ns 4.64ns 0.0138 0 0 976 B
#5628 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.5μs 0.375ns 1.4ns 0.0134 0 0 976 B
#5628 CallElasticsearch net472 2.39μs 1.64ns 6.35ns 0.158 0.00119 0 995 B
#5628 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.32μs 0.454ns 1.76ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#5628 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.7μs 1.72ns 6.2ns 0.0135 0 0 1.02 KB
#5628 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.45μs 3.29ns 11.9ns 0.166 0.00123 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.23μs 2.19ns 8.19ns 0.0134 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.635ns 2.29ns 0.0127 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.79μs 1.81ns 7.03ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#5628 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.3μs 1.36ns 5.08ns 0.013 0 0 952 B
#5628 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.62μs 0.962ns 3.6ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#5628 ExecuteAsync net472 1.8μs 0.677ns 2.44ns 0.145 0.000891 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.1μs 3.93ns 14.7ns 0.0307 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.12μs 1.67ns 6.45ns 0.0382 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.47μs 2.85ns 11ns 0.496 0 0 3.12 KB
#5628 SendAsync net6.0 4.25μs 2.04ns 7.62ns 0.0297 0 0 2.22 KB
#5628 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.12μs 1.59ns 5.94ns 0.0357 0 0 2.76 KB
#5628 SendAsync net472 7.57μs 3.46ns 13.4ns 0.493 0 0 3.12 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.54μs 0.632ns 2.36ns 0.023 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.14μs 1.12ns 4.18ns 0.0222 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.5μs 0.941ns 3.65ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.62μs 1.09ns 4.08ns 0.0227 0 0 1.64 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.23μs 1.28ns 4.96ns 0.0223 0 0 1.64 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net472 2.48μs 1.5ns 5.62ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 118μs 78.3ns 303ns 0.0584 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 121μs 86.2ns 322ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 152μs 60.7ns 227ns 0.683 0.228 0 4.46 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net6.0 117μs 170ns 657ns 0.0581 0 0 4.28 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 120μs 87.5ns 327ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net472 152μs 60.2ns 233ns 0.68 0.227 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.03μs 1.33ns 4.99ns 0.0304 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.23μs 2.32ns 9ns 0.0298 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.76μs 2.05ns 7.69ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.08μs 0.889ns 3.44ns 0.0309 0 0 2.2 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.14μs 7.37ns 28.5ns 0.0287 0 0 2.2 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net472 4.86μs 2.04ns 7.89ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5628

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive‑net6.0 1.121 1,305.74 1,463.69

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.31μs 0.598ns 2.24ns 0.0157 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.81μs 1.82ns 7.04ns 0.0158 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.13μs 0.798ns 2.88ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
#5628 SendReceive net6.0 1.46μs 0.834ns 3.23ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
#5628 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 0.887ns 3.43ns 0.0149 0 0 1.14 KB
#5628 SendReceive net472 2.1μs 1.32ns 5.11ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.77μs 0.791ns 2.96ns 0.0223 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.9μs 1.1ns 4.26ns 0.0216 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.52μs 2.04ns 7.63ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.82μs 1.34ns 5.21ns 0.0226 0 0 1.6 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.13μs 2.03ns 7.88ns 0.0207 0 0 1.65 KB
#5628 EnrichedLog net472 4.35μs 1.57ns 5.67ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5628

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net6.0 1.534 629.70 410.55 several?

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 642ns 11.2ns 112ns 0.00813 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 572ns 0.674ns 2.61ns 0.00775 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 611ns 1.02ns 3.94ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 497ns 0.203ns 0.761ns 0.00978 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 737ns 0.308ns 1.19ns 0.00951 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 897ns 0.801ns 3.1ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#5628 StartFinishSpan net6.0 411ns 0.152ns 0.569ns 0.00805 0 0 576 B
#5628 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 556ns 2.74ns 11.6ns 0.00787 0 0 576 B
#5628 StartFinishSpan net472 653ns 2.47ns 9.58ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
#5628 StartFinishScope net6.0 485ns 0.226ns 0.847ns 0.00975 0 0 696 B
#5628 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 707ns 0.442ns 1.71ns 0.00957 0 0 696 B
#5628 StartFinishScope net472 856ns 1.21ns 4.7ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 622ns 0.357ns 1.38ns 0.00996 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 971ns 0.519ns 2.01ns 0.00932 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.07μs 1.27ns 4.94ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#5628 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 600ns 0.162ns 0.605ns 0.00988 0 0 696 B
#5628 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 926ns 0.56ns 2.17ns 0.00952 0 0 696 B
#5628 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.07μs 0.863ns 3.34ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@GreenMatan GreenMatan merged commit 0d9b857 into master May 30, 2024
62 checks passed
@GreenMatan GreenMatan deleted the matang/align-line-probe-lines-data-type branch May 30, 2024 13:53
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v2 milestone May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants