Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for the "new" dev.azure.com style URLs in SourceLink URL parsing logic #6159

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

OmerRaviv
Copy link
Collaborator

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv commented Oct 16, 2024

Summary of changes

Fixes #6146

Backported to 2.x in #6178

Reason for change

Customer reported an issue where the tracer reports incorrect git.repository_url as a result of this bug.

Test coverage

Add a new test case.

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv requested review from a team as code owners October 16, 2024 04:14
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: omerr/fix-sourcelink-azure-devops-dev-urls
Commit report: b4db927
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 371628 Passed, 2103 Skipped, 15h 4m 34.34s Total Time
⌛ 1 Performance Regression

⌛ Performance Regressions vs Default Branch (1)

  • Profiler_cpu_walltime - scenarios 3.54s (+214.99ms, +6%) - Details

Copy link
Member

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Just a couple of nits (let me know if you'd like me to take care of those!)

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv force-pushed the omerr/fix-sourcelink-azure-devops-dev-urls branch 2 times, most recently from 7f31392 to cf0c1f9 Compare October 17, 2024 03:26
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 17, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 66, 74
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (1,113ms)  : 1094, 1132
     .   : milestone, 1113,
    master - mean (1,113ms)  : 1078, 1148
     .   : milestone, 1113,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (109ms)  : 105, 113
     .   : milestone, 109,
    master - mean (109ms)  : 107, 112
     .   : milestone, 109,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (771ms)  : 752, 790
     .   : milestone, 771,
    master - mean (770ms)  : 751, 789
     .   : milestone, 770,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (92ms)  : 90, 94
     .   : milestone, 92,
    master - mean (92ms)  : 90, 95
     .   : milestone, 92,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (729ms)  : 710, 748
     .   : milestone, 729,
    master - mean (728ms)  : 710, 746
     .   : milestone, 728,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (191ms)  : 188, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 186, 195
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (1,207ms)  : 1187, 1227
     .   : milestone, 1207,
    master - mean (1,202ms)  : 1183, 1221
     .   : milestone, 1202,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (277ms)  : 273, 281
     .   : milestone, 277,
    master - mean (275ms)  : 271, 280
     .   : milestone, 275,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (947ms)  : 927, 967
     .   : milestone, 947,
    master - mean (944ms)  : 922, 966
     .   : milestone, 944,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) - mean (265ms)  : 261, 268
     .   : milestone, 265,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 260, 270
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6159) - mean (929ms)  : 911, 948
     .   : milestone, 929,
    master - mean (927ms)  : 906, 947
     .   : milestone, 927,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 17, 2024

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) (10.968M)   : 0, 10968128
    master (11.101M)   : 0, 11100941
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6159) (7.427M)   : 0, 7427216
    master (7.389M)   : 0, 7389242
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.528M)   : 0, 7528321

    section Manual
    master (10.986M)   : 0, 10986040

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6159) (6.949M)   : 0, 6949417
    master (6.820M)   : 0, 6819504

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.304M)   : 0, 10304285

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) (9.515M)   : 0, 9515336
    master (9.728M)   : 0, 9727588
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6159) (6.679M)   : 0, 6679155
    master (6.463M)   : 0, 6463228

    section Trace stats
    master (6.591M)   : 0, 6591023

    section Manual
    master (9.627M)   : 0, 9627166

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6159) (6.070M)   : 0, 6070293
    master (6.028M)   : 0, 6027833

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.762M)   : 0, 8761785

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6159) (9.749M)   : 0, 9749215
    master (9.966M)   : 0, 9965554
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6159) (6.401M)   : 0, 6401159
    master (6.494M)   : 0, 6493647
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.096M)   : 0, 7096492

    section Manual
    master (9.850M)   : 0, 9850046

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6159) (6.022M)   : 0, 6021713
    master (5.952M)   : 0, 5952386

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.119M)   : 0, 9118624

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Oct 17, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6159 compared to master:

  • 4 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.164
  • 1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.93μs 40.4ns 181ns 0.0152 0.00758 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.87μs 53.1ns 340ns 0.0143 0.00477 0 5.62 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.5μs 70.4ns 273ns 1.04 0.324 0.0971 6.07 KB
#6159 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.74μs 44.3ns 332ns 0.0158 0.00789 0 5.42 KB
#6159 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.97μs 54.7ns 328ns 0.0189 0.00946 0 5.62 KB
#6159 StartStopWithChild net472 16.2μs 59.8ns 231ns 1.01 0.29 0.0965 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 492μs 211ns 761ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 638μs 1.29μs 4.83μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 832μs 362ns 1.4μs 0.417 0 0 3.3 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 473μs 287ns 1.07μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 653μs 409ns 1.53μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 842μs 537ns 2.01μs 0.419 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 213μs 1.21μs 8.5μs 0.201 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 221μs 1.25μs 9.01μs 0.215 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.00364ns 0.00143ns 0.00535ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6159 SendRequest net6.0 197μs 1.06μs 5.72μs 0.192 0 0 18.45 KB
#6159 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 237μs 1.36μs 11μs 0.231 0 0 20.61 KB
#6159 SendRequest net472 0.000308ns 0.000224ns 0.000806ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #6159

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑netcoreapp3.1 41.95 KB 41.68 KB -268 B -0.64%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 571μs 2.93μs 13.8μs 0.553 0 0 41.63 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 668μs 3.2μs 12.4μs 0.322 0 0 41.95 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 862μs 2.99μs 11.2μs 8.13 2.57 0.428 53.34 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 570μs 2.93μs 14μs 0.573 0 0 41.53 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 704μs 3.84μs 21.7μs 0.336 0 0 41.68 KB
#6159 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 867μs 3.89μs 15.1μs 8.19 2.59 0.431 53.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.2μs 1.67ns 6.25ns 0.0143 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.7μs 1.98ns 7.68ns 0.0136 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.16μs 1.76ns 6.6ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
#6159 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.32μs 1.16ns 4.48ns 0.0146 0 0 1.02 KB
#6159 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.76μs 0.679ns 2.45ns 0.0133 0 0 1.02 KB
#6159 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.08μs 1.66ns 5.98ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6159

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync‑net6.0 1.183 1,449.72 1,224.95

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.23μs 0.31ns 1.16ns 0.0136 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.5μs 1.08ns 4.18ns 0.0127 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.48μs 1.57ns 5.86ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.45μs 0.762ns 2.95ns 0.0138 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.56ns 2.02ns 0.0141 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.55μs 0.914ns 3.42ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6159 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.19μs 0.925ns 3.58ns 0.0139 0 0 976 B
#6159 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.46μs 0.601ns 2.25ns 0.0131 0 0 976 B
#6159 CallElasticsearch net472 2.42μs 1.27ns 4.91ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
#6159 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.22μs 1.4ns 5.41ns 0.0135 0 0 952 B
#6159 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.522ns 2.02ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
#6159 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.6μs 1.38ns 5.17ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6159

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync‑net6.0 1.169 1,386.86 1,186.86

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.39μs 0.538ns 2.01ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.55μs 1.95ns 7.56ns 0.0125 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.87μs 0.402ns 1.5ns 0.145 0.000936 0 915 B
#6159 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.19μs 0.824ns 3.08ns 0.0136 0 0 952 B
#6159 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 1.05ns 3.92ns 0.0125 0 0 952 B
#6159 ExecuteAsync net472 1.9μs 1.67ns 6.45ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.17μs 2.03ns 7.85ns 0.0312 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.13μs 1.59ns 5.73ns 0.036 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.84μs 2.64ns 10.2ns 0.5 0 0 3.15 KB
#6159 SendAsync net6.0 4.27μs 2.91ns 10.9ns 0.03 0 0 2.22 KB
#6159 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.21μs 3.42ns 12.8ns 0.0363 0 0 2.76 KB
#6159 SendAsync net472 7.83μs 2.36ns 8.84ns 0.498 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.54μs 0.751ns 2.91ns 0.0231 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.41μs 1.42ns 5.48ns 0.0224 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.65μs 0.863ns 3.23ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.749ns 2.8ns 0.0232 0 0 1.64 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.28μs 1.1ns 4.11ns 0.0216 0 0 1.64 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net472 2.61μs 0.787ns 3.05ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 116μs 305ns 1.18μs 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 122μs 122ns 457ns 0.0613 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 152μs 169ns 653ns 0.679 0.226 0 4.46 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net6.0 115μs 198ns 767ns 0.0579 0 0 4.28 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 123μs 186ns 721ns 0.0608 0 0 4.28 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net472 152μs 101ns 392ns 0.686 0.229 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.17μs 0.983ns 3.81ns 0.0316 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.2μs 3.55ns 13.7ns 0.0295 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.85μs 1.37ns 5.3ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.13μs 0.889ns 3.33ns 0.0298 0 0 2.2 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.29μs 1.51ns 5.83ns 0.0279 0 0 2.2 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net472 5.05μs 1.78ns 6.88ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.37μs 1.12ns 4.18ns 0.0163 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.82μs 0.877ns 3.28ns 0.0154 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.04μs 0.944ns 3.66ns 0.184 0.00102 0 1.16 KB
#6159 SendReceive net6.0 1.5μs 1.31ns 4.91ns 0.0158 0 0 1.14 KB
#6159 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.82μs 1.03ns 3.84ns 0.0149 0 0 1.14 KB
#6159 SendReceive net472 2.1μs 1.11ns 4.29ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.92μs 1.39ns 5.38ns 0.0219 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.93μs 1.16ns 4.19ns 0.0217 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.47μs 5.69ns 22ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 1ns 3.88ns 0.022 0 0 1.6 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.87μs 1.35ns 5.23ns 0.0213 0 0 1.65 KB
#6159 EnrichedLog net472 4.3μs 1.27ns 4.74ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6159

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.180 564.30 478.25
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net6.0 1.127 454.03 403.03

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 454ns 0.274ns 1.06ns 0.00811 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 623ns 0.578ns 2.16ns 0.00774 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 715ns 0.61ns 2.36ns 0.0918 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 562ns 1.85ns 7.16ns 0.00965 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 719ns 1.24ns 4.63ns 0.00949 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 890ns 0.674ns 2.52ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
#6159 StartFinishSpan net6.0 403ns 0.22ns 0.851ns 0.008 0 0 576 B
#6159 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 590ns 0.404ns 1.57ns 0.00784 0 0 576 B
#6159 StartFinishSpan net472 713ns 0.822ns 3.18ns 0.0917 0 0 578 B
#6159 StartFinishScope net6.0 478ns 0.224ns 0.807ns 0.00982 0 0 696 B
#6159 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 730ns 0.508ns 1.97ns 0.0096 0 0 696 B
#6159 StartFinishScope net472 869ns 0.789ns 2.85ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 667ns 0.353ns 1.37ns 0.00988 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 925ns 0.469ns 1.82ns 0.00934 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.15μs 1.04ns 4.02ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6159 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 675ns 0.457ns 1.77ns 0.00983 0 0 696 B
#6159 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 925ns 0.394ns 1.52ns 0.00944 0 0 696 B
#6159 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.09μs 0.642ns 2.4ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv force-pushed the omerr/fix-sourcelink-azure-devops-dev-urls branch from cf0c1f9 to 58527e4 Compare October 17, 2024 14:23
Copy link
Contributor

@dudikeleti dudikeleti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - I left one nit comment

@@ -46,15 +53,15 @@ internal override bool TryParseSourceLinkUrl(Uri uri, [NotNullWhen(true)] out st
return false;
}

var segments = uri.AbsolutePath.Split(new[] { '/' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
var segments = uri.AbsolutePath.Split(new char[] { '/' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we remove this split and the following check and do it only in BuildRepositoryUrl(uri) ?

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv force-pushed the omerr/fix-sourcelink-azure-devops-dev-urls branch from 413fb04 to b4db927 Compare October 22, 2024 01:23
@andrewlock andrewlock merged commit 434015e into master Oct 22, 2024
75 checks passed
@andrewlock andrewlock deleted the omerr/fix-sourcelink-azure-devops-dev-urls branch October 22, 2024 16:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Oct 22, 2024
andrewlock pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
…parsing logic (#6159)

## Summary of changes

Fixes #6146

## Reason for change
Customer reported an issue where the tracer reports incorrect
`git.repository_url` as a result of this bug.


## Test coverage
Add a new test case.
@andrewlock andrewlock added area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) type:bug labels Oct 22, 2024
bouwkast pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
…parsing logic (#6159 => v2) (#6178)

## Summary of changes

Fixes #6146

2.x backport of #6159

## Reason for change
Customer reported an issue where the tracer reports incorrect
`git.repository_url` as a result of this bug.

## Test coverage
Add a new test case.

Co-authored-by: Omer Raviv <omer.raviv@datadoghq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) identified-by:customer type:bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AzureDevops SourceLink Url Incorrectly parsed
3 participants