Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comments to pydantic code #123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2023
Merged

Add comments to pydantic code #123

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2023

Conversation

callumforrester
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #123 (bf50bd8) into main (1ca16e9) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #123      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.55%   73.59%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        1040     1034       -6     
==========================================
- Hits          765      761       -4     
+ Misses        275      273       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/blueapi/utils/type_validator.py 88.69% <100.00%> (+1.09%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@callumforrester callumforrester merged commit 798dcd0 into main Apr 18, 2023
@callumforrester callumforrester deleted the pydantic-docs branch April 18, 2023 07:43
keithralphs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant