Rollup merge of rust-lang#98964 - RalfJung:typo, r=Dylan-DPC

fix typo in function name

I don't know what I was doing when I named that function...
follow-up to rust-lang#98888
r? `@oli-obk`

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/machine.rs

@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ pub trait Machine<'mir, 'tcx>: Sized {
     }
 
     /// Whether CheckedBinOp MIR statements should actually check for overflow.
-    fn check_binop_checks_overflow(_ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool;
+    fn checked_binop_checks_overflow(_ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool;
 
     /// Entry point for obtaining the MIR of anything that should get evaluated.
     /// So not just functions and shims, but also const/static initializers, anonymous
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ pub macro compile_time_machine(<$mir: lifetime, $tcx: lifetime>) {
     }
 
     #[inline(always)]
-    fn check_binop_checks_overflow(_ecx: &InterpCx<$mir, $tcx, Self>) -> bool {
+    fn checked_binop_checks_overflow(_ecx: &InterpCx<$mir, $tcx, Self>) -> bool {
         true
     }
 

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operator.rs

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
         // As per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98738, we always return `false` in the 2nd
         // component when overflow checking is disabled.
         let overflowed =
-            overflowed && (force_overflow_checks || M::check_binop_checks_overflow(self));
+            overflowed && (force_overflow_checks || M::checked_binop_checks_overflow(self));
         // Write the result to `dest`.
         if let Abi::ScalarPair(..) = dest.layout.abi {
             // We can use the optimized path and avoid `place_field` (which might do