added 20 bit integral limits #935
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
jwellbelove
changed the base branch from
master
to
pull-request/#935-added-20-bit-integral-limits
jwellbelove
merged commit bf56dcf
into
ETLCPP:pull-request/#935-added-20-bit-integral-limits
63 checks passed
jwellbelove
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
…velopment # Conflicts: # support/Release notes.txt
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is supposed to bring support for compiling ETL using the -mlarge flag for MSP430 devices. The flag results in using 20 bit pointers instread of 16 bit. This allows for accessing more memory and creating larger program. This Fixes #913