Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 3xSIMD unrolling tests #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

MichalPetryka
Copy link

No description provided.

@EgorBo EgorBo merged commit 3552749 into EgorBo:unroll-memmove-arm64 Mar 21, 2023
EgorBo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
…tnet#87189)

This fixes a startup crash on Big Sur:

> error: * Assertion at /Users/runner/work/1/s/src/mono/mono/utils/mono-hwcap-arm64.c:35, condition `res == 0' not met

Because sysctl can't find some of these options:

    $ sysctl hw.optional.armv8_crc32
    hw.optional.armv8_crc32: 1
    $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_RDM
    sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_RDM'
    $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_DotProd
    sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_DotProd'
    $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA1
    sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA1'
    $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA256
    sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_SHA256'
    $ sysctl hw.optional.arm.FEAT_AES
    sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.optional.arm.FEAT_AES'

Full stack trace:

* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 2.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000010ef37560 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`monoeg_assertion_message
    frame #1: 0x0000010ef375cc libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_assertion_message + 32
    frame #2: 0x0000010ef40d6c libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_hwcap_arch_init + 544
    frame dotnet#3: 0x0000010ef54bd8 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_hwcap_init + 72
    frame dotnet#4: 0x0000010ee14dc0 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`parse_optimizations + 52
    frame dotnet#5: 0x0000010edbed48 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_init
    frame dotnet#6: 0x0000010ee18968 libmonosgen-2.0.dylib`mono_jit_init_version
    frame dotnet#7: 0x0000010f48a300 libxamarin-dotnet-debug.dylib`xamarin_bridge_initialize + 216
    frame dotnet#8: 0x0000010f4900a4 libxamarin-dotnet-debug.dylib`xamarin_main + 376
EgorBo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Fixes dotnet#95367.

Relevant part of the JitDump:

```
Using `if true` assertions from pred BB02
Assertions in: #1
fgMorphTree BB04, STMT00021 (before)
               [000070] DA---------                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
               [000057] -----------                         \--*  CAST      int <- ubyte <- int
               [000006] -----------                            \--*  EQ        int
               [000004] -----------                               +--*  LCL_VAR   ref    V02 tmp1          (last use)
               [000055] H----------                               \--*  CNS_INT(h) ref     'Frozen EmptyPartition`1<Int32> object'

Assertion prop for index #1 in BB04:
               [000006] -----------                         *  EQ        int
GenTreeNode creates assertion:
               [000070] DA---+-----                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
In BB04 New Local Constant Assertion: V10 == [0000000000000001], index = #2

fgMorphTree BB04, STMT00021 (after)
               [000070] DA---+-----                         *  STORE_LCL_VAR ubyte  V10 tmp9
               [000055] H----+-----                         \--*  CNS_INT(h) int
```

The JitDump is unfinished because the compiler crashes when trying to dump the last line. Clearly, the `CNS_INT` is no longer a handle at that point because we just bashed it to a constant 1.
EgorBo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2024
CodeQL flagged various places where we're dereferencing pointers that could be NULL, this PR systematically cleans some of them up via g_assert.
* g_assert result of g_build_path calls
* Allocation failure handling
* mono_class_inflate_generic_class_checked can return NULL
EgorBo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
…#102133)

This generalizes the indir reordering optimization (that currently only
triggers for loads) to kick in for GT_STOREIND nodes.

The main complication with doing this is the fact that the data node of
the second indirection needs its own reordering with the previous
indirection. The existing logic works by reordering all nodes between
the first and second indirection that are unrelated to the second
indirection's computation to happen after it. Once that is done we know
that there are no uses of the first indirection's result between it and
the second indirection, so after doing the necessary interference checks
we can safely move the previous indirection to happen after the data
node of the second indirection.

Example:
```csharp
class Body { public double x, y, z, vx, vy, vz, mass; }

static void Advance(double dt, Body[] bodies)
{
    foreach (Body b in bodies)
    {
        b.x += dt * b.vx;
        b.y += dt * b.vy;
        b.z += dt * b.vz;
    }
}
```

Diff:
```diff
@@ -1,18 +1,17 @@
-G_M55007_IG04:  ;; offset=0x001C
+G_M55007_IG04:  ;; offset=0x0020
             ldr     x3, [x0, w1, UXTW dotnet#3]
             ldp     d16, d17, [x3, #0x08]
             ldp     d18, d19, [x3, #0x20]
             fmul    d18, d0, d18
             fadd    d16, d16, d18
-            str     d16, [x3, #0x08]
-            fmul    d16, d0, d19
-            fadd    d16, d17, d16
-            str     d16, [x3, #0x10]
+            fmul    d18, d0, d19
+            fadd    d17, d17, d18
+            stp     d16, d17, [x3, #0x08]
             ldr     d16, [x3, #0x18]
             ldr     d17, [x3, #0x30]
             fmul    d17, d0, d17
             fadd    d16, d16, d17
             str     d16, [x3, #0x18]
             add     w1, w1, #1
             cmp     w2, w1
             bgt     G_M55007_IG04
```
EgorBo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2024
* bug #1: don't allow for values out of the SerializationRecordType enum range

* bug #2: throw SerializationException rather than KeyNotFoundException when the referenced record is missing or it points to a record of different type

* bug dotnet#3: throw SerializationException rather than FormatException when it's being thrown by BinaryReader (or sth else that we use)

* bug dotnet#4: document the fact that IOException can be thrown

* bug dotnet#5: throw SerializationException rather than OverflowException when parsing the decimal fails

* bug dotnet#6: 0 and 17 are illegal values for PrimitiveType enum

* bug dotnet#7: throw SerializationException when a surrogate character is read (so far an ArgumentException was thrown)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants