Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add Address::is_liquid #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

RCasatta
Copy link
Collaborator

@RCasatta RCasatta commented Sep 19, 2024

User code can already compare against AddressParams, but it seems easier to find a method to check if the address is liquid. Even tough is less general because you can't discriminate between elements and liquid testnet, most of the time wallets are interested only in the mainnet or not discrimination.

User code can already compare against AddressParams, but it seems more
easy to find a method to check if the address is liquid.
Even thoug is less general because you can't discriminate between
elements and liquid testnet, most of the time wallets are interested
only in the mainnet or not discrimination.
Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 17578d7 successfully ran local tests; sure

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

CI failures are unrelated and due to poor pinning of dependencies and toolchains.

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit b21356e into ElementsProject:master Sep 19, 2024
3 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants