Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use output json instead of metadata for Cromwell #123

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ruchim
Copy link

@ruchim ruchim commented Feb 19, 2020

** DO NOT MERGE ** -- dependent on a version of Cromwell that doesn't yet exist (likely Cromwell 49).

There's now an option in the Cromwell run mode command line to publish the outputs as a json in a location specified by the user. This pull request leverages that change.

Additional Consideration: Metadata is a large file and holds a ton of data, so we could not read the metadata file at all unless workflow failed and its important to extract a failure message and more.

@ruchim ruchim changed the title use output json instead of metadata for Cromwell *Blocked* use output json instead of metadata for Cromwell Feb 19, 2020
@jdidion jdidion changed the title *Blocked* use output json instead of metadata for Cromwell Use output json instead of metadata for Cromwell Feb 19, 2020
@jdidion jdidion removed the blocked label Dec 22, 2020
@jdidion
Copy link
Collaborator

jdidion commented Dec 23, 2020

@ruchim what ever happened to this new command line option? I still don't see it (as of Cromwell 54).

@ruchim
Copy link
Author

ruchim commented Jan 7, 2021

hey @jdidion -- the PR was closed: broadinstitute/cromwell#5420 (comment)

I'm happy to resurface but the reason it was initially closed was that when I made the PR, pytest had already worked around it and we weren't sure if it would get usage.

@jdidion
Copy link
Collaborator

jdidion commented Jan 7, 2021

I would definitely appreciate this feature. Of course it's up to the Cromwell team to decide if it's broadly useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants