re-export IGeocodeParams (until v2.0.0)

[jgravois]

@skitterm aptly pointed out that i removed IGeocodeParams in v1.17.0.

fb2ba9a#diff-094efe5f622403522c0543b08434e397

just because we weren't actually utilizing the interface in any of the geocoding methods doesn't mean other developers weren't using it.

whoops!

this PR just adds a note to the CHANGELOG as breadcrumb. while i was in there i bumped the copyright year and added keywords to our package.json files to fix this 😢

[jgravois]

if @tomwayson (or any other SemVer police) tell me i need to bump to v2.0.0, i am not afraid.

[patrickarlt]

@jgravois why not just add it back in until 2.0.0 THEN remove it?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #468 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #468   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          94     94           
  Lines        1209   1209           
  Branches      219    219           
=====================================
  Hits         1209   1209

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/arcgis-rest-geocoder/src/geocode.ts	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba893b7...01a1170. Read the comment docs.

[tomwayson]

i am not afraid

I don't do semver for types, so LGTM. Types aren't real anyway.

[patrickarlt]

Types aren't real anyway.
@tomwayson

You monster 👹 👿 !

[jgravois]

why not just add it back in until 2.0.0 THEN remove it?

that never even occurred to me. great idea!

[patrickarlt]

@jgravois should we really remove this anyway?? leaving it in doesn't bump out bundle sizes and leaving it in also allow TypeScript users to get autocomplete and stricter type checking in their IDEs.

[jgravois]

should we really remove this anyway??

it should absolutely be removed. its an abandoned antipattern.

as you said in #137 (comment), we want folks to extend IRequestOptions, not IParams.

[patrickarlt]

Derp good point.