[HOLD for payment 2024-01-17] [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From #29895

kbecciv · 2023-10-18T18:01:16Z

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

Version Number: 1.3.86.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @rakshitjain13
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1697639775327799

Action Performed:

Open app
Click on '+' FAB icon in LHS
Click on Request Money
Select Distance tab
Click on Add stop and fill India
Click on Stop and fill India
Click on Next button to proceed further
Able to Create Request

Expected Result:

It should not create request with not valid waypoints

Actual Result:

Able to create distance request with duplicate waypoints

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.29.43.PM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2023-10-17.at.1.24.34.AM.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.21.36.PM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.21.36.PM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.36.52.PM.mov

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.41.28.PM.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-10-16.at.7.33.40.PM.mov

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01f177f4854fa6146e
Upwork Job ID: 1714703219702423552
Last Price Increase: 2023-11-01
Automatic offers:

rojiphil | Contributor | 28035387

melvin-bot · 2023-10-18T18:01:22Z

Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

melvin-bot · 2023-10-18T18:01:22Z

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01f177f4854fa6146e

melvin-bot · 2023-10-18T18:01:24Z

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
- If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
- If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
- If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
- Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

rakshitjain13 · 2023-10-18T18:01:24Z

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Next Button Activated with Same Stop and Finish Point in Request Money

What is the root cause of that problem?

In src/components/DistanceRequest.js
we check for validwaypoint and then decide wether we have to go on next step or not . The logic is to check the size of validatedWaypoints array which is shown below .

App/src/components/DistanceRequest/index.js

Lines 183 to 191 in 6cd9c84

    
           const submitWaypoints = useCallback(() => { 
        
               // If there is any error or loading state, don't let user go to next page. 
        
               if (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2 || hasRouteError || isLoadingRoute || isLoading) { 
        
                   setHasError(true); 
        
                   return; 
        
               } 
        
               onSubmit(waypoints); 
        
           }, [onSubmit, setHasError, hasRouteError, isLoadingRoute, isLoading, validatedWaypoints, waypoints]);

Now to generate validatedWaypoints the code is in fileSrc/libs/TransactionUtils.js

App/src/libs/TransactionUtils.ts

Lines 416 to 445 in 6cd9c84

    
           function getValidWaypoints(waypoints: WaypointCollection, reArrangeIndexes = false): WaypointCollection { 
        
               const sortedIndexes = Object.keys(waypoints).map(getWaypointIndex).sort(); 
        
               const waypointValues = sortedIndexes.map((index) => waypoints[`waypoint${index}`]); 
        
               // Ensure the number of waypoints is between 2 and 25 
        
               if (waypointValues.length < 2 || waypointValues.length > 25) { 
        
                   return {}; 
        
               } 
        
               let lastWaypointIndex = -1; 
        
               return waypointValues.reduce<WaypointCollection>((acc, currentWaypoint, index) => { 
        
                   const previousWaypoint = waypointValues[lastWaypointIndex]; 
        
                   // Check if the waypoint has a valid address 
        
                   if (!waypointHasValidAddress(currentWaypoint)) { 
        
                       return acc; 
        
                   } 
        
                   // Check for adjacent waypoints with the same address 
        
                   if (previousWaypoint && currentWaypoint?.address === previousWaypoint.address) { 
        
                       return acc; 
        
                   } 
        
                   const validatedWaypoints: WaypointCollection = {...acc, [`waypoint${reArrangeIndexes ? lastWaypointIndex + 1 : index}`]: currentWaypoint}; 
        
                   lastWaypointIndex += 1; 
        
                   return validatedWaypoints; 
        
               }, {}); 
        
           }

This function fails in a edge case where starting waypoints are invalid because here lastWaypointIndex is equal to -1 in starting which suggests that first waypoint will always be valid when waypoints size > 1 .

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

We have to have increment lastWaypointIndex till we find some valid waypoint and then it is good to go . Here is my solution


function getValidWaypoints(waypoints: WaypointCollection, reArrangeIndexes = false): WaypointCollection { 
     const sortedIndexes = Object.keys(waypoints).map(getWaypointIndex).sort(); 
     const waypointValues = sortedIndexes.map((index) => waypoints[`waypoint${index}`]); 
     // Ensure the number of waypoints is between 2 and 25 
     if (waypointValues.length < 2 || waypointValues.length > 25) { 
         return {}; 
     } 
  
     let lastWaypointIndex = -1; 
     let foundFirstValidWaypoint = false;
  
     return waypointValues.reduce<WaypointCollection>((acc, currentWaypoint, index) => { 
         const previousWaypoint = waypointValues[lastWaypointIndex]; 

           // Skip all starting invalid waypoints
            if (foundFirstValidWaypoint == false && !waypointHasValidAddress(currentWaypoint)) {
                lastWaypointIndex += 1;
                return acc;
            } else {
                foundFirstValidWaypoint = true;
            }

  
         // Check if the waypoint has a valid address 
         if (!waypointHasValidAddress(currentWaypoint)) { 
             return acc; 
         } 
  
         // Check for adjacent waypoints with the same address 
         if (previousWaypoint && currentWaypoint?.address === previousWaypoint.address) { 
             return acc; 
         } 
  
         const validatedWaypoints: WaypointCollection = {...acc, [`waypoint${reArrangeIndexes ? lastWaypointIndex + 1 : index}`]: currentWaypoint}; 
  
         lastWaypointIndex += 1; 
  
         return validatedWaypoints; 
     }, {}); 
 }

Here I have introduced a new variable named as foundFirstValidWaypoint which is false in starting and once we find a validwaypoint we will set it to true till the time we will increment lastWaypointIndex in each iteration .

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

We can add a check that the start point should always be there.
To do the above we have to add a new condition in the below check

App/src/components/DistanceRequest/index.js

Line 185 in 7601f89

    
           if (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2 || hasRouteError || isLoadingRoute || isLoading) {

if (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2 || _.isEmpty(validatedWaypoints['wayppoint0']) || hasRouteError || isLoadingRoute || isLoading)

leading to above adding the same condition below

App/src/components/DistanceRequest/index.js

Lines 158 to 160 in 7601f89

    
           if (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2) { 
        
               return {0: translate('iou.error.emptyWaypointsErrorMessage')}; 
        
           }

 if (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2 || _.isEmpty(validatedWaypoints['wayppoint0']))

Also here the same condition

App/src/components/DistanceRequest/index.js

Lines 225 to 227 in 7601f89

    
           {((hasError && _.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2) || hasRouteError) && ( 
        
               <DotIndicatorMessage 
        
                   style={[styles.mh4, styles.mv3]}

((hasError && (_.size(validatedWaypoints) < 2 || _.isEmpty(validatedWaypoints['waypoint0']))) || hasRouteError)

melvin-bot · 2023-10-18T18:01:28Z

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @rushatgabhane (External)

kbecciv · 2023-10-18T18:02:00Z

Linked PR #27045

strepanier03 · 2023-10-18T23:23:04Z

I'm not able to recreate this following the steps in the report.

I see an error:

Checking the link PR shared above, this GH is a regression.

Anyone able to recreate this still?

strepanier03 · 2023-10-18T23:26:47Z

Doubled checked and both staging and prod show the error.

rakshitjain13 · 2023-10-19T04:50:29Z

@strepanier03 I think you misread the steps. You can follow one of the videos for information.

0xmiros · 2023-10-19T07:55:07Z

I think this one should be closed in favor of #28477

rakshitjain13 · 2023-10-19T08:07:32Z

@DylanDylann I don't think so as in the above case validatedWaypoints size will be 2

melvin-bot · 2023-10-24T12:54:08Z

@strepanier03, @rushatgabhane Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?

strepanier03 · 2023-10-24T15:50:28Z

After retesting I see where I messed up the steps and was able to create the expense.

melvin-bot · 2023-10-25T16:00:19Z

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

strepanier03 · 2023-10-27T21:48:26Z

@rushatgabhane friendly bump on the proposal here when you get a chance.

melvin-bot · 2024-01-08T17:52:18Z

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @rojiphil, @danieldoglas, @strepanier03, @rushatgabhane eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

danieldoglas · 2024-01-08T18:05:53Z

This was merged today, should be deployed to staging soon.

melvin-bot · 2024-01-10T05:58:55Z

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

melvin-bot · 2024-01-10T05:58:58Z

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.23-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

fix duplicate endpoints #32999

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-17. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

@rojiphil requires payment automatic offer (Contributor)
@rushatgabhane requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests
@rakshitjain13 requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ) - Bug report that got in just before the deadline.

melvin-bot · 2024-01-10T05:59:00Z

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

[@rushatgabhane] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
[@rushatgabhane] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
[@rushatgabhane] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
[@rushatgabhane] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
[@rushatgabhane] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
[@strepanier03] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

rushatgabhane · 2024-01-17T04:33:42Z

The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: Refactor the money request creation flow #28618
The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/28618/files#r1454558927
A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N.A.
Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. Sure!

If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again

 1. Click Request Money via Global FAB(+)
 2. Select Start Address (A)
 3. Select Finish Address (B)
 4. Click Add stop and add Address (B)
 5. Verify that you see a duplicate waypoint error message.

rushatgabhane · 2024-01-17T04:34:16Z

@strepanier03 could you please add payment summary. Thank you! 🙇

strepanier03 · 2024-01-17T19:58:26Z

Yup, will do, today is the release day so that is the plan.

strepanier03 · 2024-01-17T21:00:20Z

Payment summary

@rojiphil - $500 paid via Upwork
@rakshitjain13 - $50 paid via Upwork
@rushatgabhane - $500 via Manual Request (@JmillsExpensify)

rakshitjain13 · 2024-01-18T04:39:26Z

@strepanier03 Accepted the offer

strepanier03 · 2024-01-18T18:17:32Z

@rakshitjain13 - After reviewing this more carefully, I'm not sure why the payment comment had your name listed. I don't see that you worked on the PR or the review for this bug.

I am going to need to cancel the contract and we won't be able to pay it.

If you can link me to the work you did for this bug, I can reconsider but at this point, I don't think there's any work related to this that you need to be paid for. Is that correct?

0xmiros · 2024-01-18T18:19:16Z

@rakshitjain13 is a bug reporter 😄

strepanier03 · 2024-01-18T18:27:05Z

Got it thank you @0xmiroslav , looks like it got in right before we paused the program so I'll get it sorted.

strepanier03 · 2024-01-18T18:29:27Z

@rakshitjain13 sorry about the confusion there, that's my bad. I have sent over a new offer for the right price as the original one I sent was for $500 and it should be $50.

rakshitjain13 · 2024-01-18T18:30:45Z

@strepanier03 No worry! Thank You . I thought Expensify is giving New Year gifts 🤫

strepanier03 · 2024-01-18T18:41:06Z

All that's left is the manual request payment for @rushatgabhane

Payment summary is here. Closing and assigning Jason.

JmillsExpensify · 2024-01-30T16:48:29Z

$500 payment approved for @rushatgabhane based on this summary.

kbecciv added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot assigned strepanier03 Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot changed the title ~~Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From~~ [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot assigned rushatgabhane Oct 18, 2023

strepanier03 added the Needs Reproduction Reproducible steps needed label Oct 18, 2023

rakshitjain13 mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2023

[$500] Distance - Same location is allowed when it is entered in "Stop" #28477

Closed

6 tasks

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view

melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Oct 23, 2023

melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Oct 24, 2023

DylanDylann mentioned this issue Oct 26, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2023-11-22] [$500] Distance - Empty waypoint is not discarded but filled with Finish address in distance request #29886

Closed

6 tasks

melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Oct 26, 2023

melvin-bot bot added Monthly KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jan 8, 2024

melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Monthly KSv2 labels Jan 10, 2024

melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Jan 10, 2024

melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jan 16, 2024

rushatgabhane mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2024

Refactor the money request creation flow #28618

Merged

58 tasks

paultsimura mentioned this issue Jan 18, 2024

[Payment due][$500] Distance Expense - Impossible to remove a waypoint when editing a distance request offline #34686

Closed

6 tasks

strepanier03 closed this as completed Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 assigned JmillsExpensify Jan 18, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[HOLD for payment 2024-01-17] [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From #29895

[HOLD for payment 2024-01-17] [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From #29895

kbecciv commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited by melvin-bot bot

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited by strepanier03

Loading

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

kbecciv commented Oct 18, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 18, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 18, 2023

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 19, 2023

0xmiros commented Oct 19, 2023

This comment was marked as outdated.

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 19, 2023

This comment was marked as off-topic.

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 24, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 27, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2024

danieldoglas commented Jan 8, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024 •

edited by strepanier03

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024

rushatgabhane commented Jan 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane commented Jan 17, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 17, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rakshitjain13 commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

0xmiros commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

rakshitjain13 commented Jan 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

JmillsExpensify commented Jan 30, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-01-17] [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From #29895

[HOLD for payment 2024-01-17] [$500] Distance - Able to request money by distance by adding a stop same as finish point without enterring start point From #29895

Comments

kbecciv commented Oct 18, 2023 • edited by melvin-bot bot Loading

Action Performed:

Expected Result:

Actual Result:

Workaround:

Platforms:

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023 • edited by strepanier03 Loading

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 18, 2023 • edited Loading

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

What is the root cause of that problem?

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023

kbecciv commented Oct 18, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 18, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 18, 2023

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 19, 2023

0xmiros commented Oct 19, 2023

This comment was marked as outdated.

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 19, 2023

This comment was marked as off-topic.

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 24, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2023

strepanier03 commented Oct 27, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2024

danieldoglas commented Jan 8, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024 • edited by strepanier03 Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024

rushatgabhane commented Jan 17, 2024 • edited Loading

rushatgabhane commented Jan 17, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 17, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 17, 2024 • edited Loading

Payment summary

rakshitjain13 commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

0xmiros commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

rakshitjain13 commented Jan 18, 2024 • edited Loading

strepanier03 commented Jan 18, 2024

JmillsExpensify commented Jan 30, 2024

kbecciv commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited by melvin-bot bot

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited by strepanier03

Loading

rakshitjain13 commented Oct 18, 2023 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2024 •

edited by strepanier03

Loading

rushatgabhane commented Jan 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

strepanier03 commented Jan 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rakshitjain13 commented Jan 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading