-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Echo cla actor #1821
Echo cla actor #1821
Conversation
Testing workflow again, no need to wait for e2e |
@Jag96 looks like this was merged without passing tests. Please add a note explaining why this was done or remove the |
This failed on the CLA workflow again, and it didn't print out the CLA actor: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify.cash/runs/2127310065?check_suite_focus=true |
|
This is super weird, and makes me think that the CLA workflow is for some reason not using the code on master. |
Did you figure this one out? |
Tested in Public-Test-Repo https://github.com/Andrew-Test-Org/Public-Test-Repo/pull/44/checks?check_run_id=2127201191 and
github.event.pull_request.user.login
does give the creator of the PR. So it must be some other syntax error. This is a bit of a shot-in-the-dark, but given the following passage from the GH Actions docs, I think it's worth a shot: