Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 29378 Distance - Search is open in background on distance image preview #30556

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

tienifr
Copy link
Contributor

@tienifr tienifr commented Oct 29, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #29378
PROPOSAL: #29378 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open the app (web/mweb/desktop)
  2. Open any distance request money report or raise one and open
  3. Click on map image
  4. Click on 3 dots to open replace popup
  5. Click CTRL+K / CMD+K and observe that app changes URL to search but still displays map preview (search is open in background)
  6. App closes map preview and open search on using search shortcut
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

  1. Open the app (web/mweb/desktop)
  2. Open any distance request money report or raise one and open
  3. Click on map image
  4. Click on 3 dots to open replace popup
  5. Click CTRL+K / CMD+K and observe that app changes URL to search but still displays map preview (search is open in background)
  6. App closes map preview and open search on using search shortcut
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screenrecorder-2023-10-29-18-02-59-704.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-29.at.18.02.27.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-10-29.at.17.55.06.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-10-29.at.18.19.44.mov

@tienifr tienifr marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2023 11:22
@tienifr tienifr requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2023 11:22
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ArekChr and removed request for a team October 29, 2023 11:22
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 29, 2023

@ArekChr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@ArekChr ArekChr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've noticed some issues in the parts of our app where we use setCloseModal. It seems like it’s not working correctly in all cases.

Also, I’m confused about why we are using a key and a count number for closing modals. I can’t find where we really need the count number or how it helps us. Can someone explain why we use this system? I think maybe we can make it simpler by rewriting closeModals object to an array.

src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
/**
* Get the available key that we can store the onClose callback into it
*/
function getAvailableKey() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function increases a number to make new keys. This could cause problems if we make a lot of keys over time or if many things happen at once.

src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 1, 2023

@ArekChr Thanks for your review. If we use the array, how can we clear the onClose function when the modal is hidden?

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Nov 6, 2023

@tienifr I think the onClose function is still there after we close the modal. We can make setOnCloseModal give back a function that clears the onClose. Then we can find this onClose by its reference instead of passing key, then remove it.

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 7, 2023

@ArekChr Thanks for your suggestion. I just update the PR. Thanks

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Nov 7, 2023

@tienifr I've noticed a regression issue with shortcuts: CMD+K or CMD+J don't open the chat or shortcuts menu as they should and only work after switching chats. On the main branch it works as expected.

src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/Modal.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 8, 2023

@tienifr I've noticed a regression issue with shortcuts: CMD+K or CMD+J don't open the chat or shortcuts menu as they should and only work after switching chats. On the main branch it works as expected.

Ah, my bad. I forgot the case when closeModals is empty. We already implemented that case before, and I just did the same.

Thanks for your comment. I updated

Comment on lines 33 to 34
const reverseCloseModals = [...closeModals].reverse();
reverseCloseModals.forEach((onClose) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit.

Suggested change
const reverseCloseModals = [...closeModals].reverse();
reverseCloseModals.forEach((onClose) => {
[...closeModals].reverse().forEach((onClose) => {

onOpenCallback: () => Modal.setCloseModal(() => props.onClose(props.anchorRef)),
onCloseCallback: removeOnClose.current,
onOpenCallback: () => {
removeOnClose.current();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this needed? Is this workaround associated with the logic for opening and closing modals?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before saving onClose, we need to remove the previous one right? Although we have the logic to prevent saving duplicate onClose but we just compare the reference. It's not really correct because the reference can be changed (even they have the same mean).

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Nov 8, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mweb.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb.safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 9, 2023

@ArekChr Ah I see, we can move the removeOnClose ref to useEffect and call it in cleanup function

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 17, 2023

@ArekChr Thanks for pointing that out. Updated

Copy link
Contributor

@ArekChr ArekChr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All works, skipped mobile screenshots as we don't use keyboard shortcuts here, thanks!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from pecanoro November 17, 2023 09:26
@pecanoro
Copy link
Contributor

@tienifr @ArekChr The code looks good and even though we don't use the popover on mobile, the code is modifying the base modal, so please add a video or screenshot that we didn't break the modal for all platforms.

@ArekChr
Copy link
Contributor

ArekChr commented Nov 21, 2023

@pecanoro Uploaded videos for all mobile platforms. Let me know if we can test more modal use cases to ensure everything works properly.

@pecanoro pecanoro merged commit 6507621 into Expensify:main Nov 21, 2023
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/pecanoro in version: 1.4.2-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.2-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

if (props.isVisible) {
props.onModalShow();
onOpen({
ref: props.withoutOverlayRef,
close: props.onClose,
anchorRef: props.anchorRef,
onCloseCallback: () => Modal.setCloseModal(null),
onOpenCallback: () => Modal.setCloseModal(() => props.onClose(props.anchorRef)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #32743, it looks like we haven't removed these two callbacks completely, so it caused that bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants