-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow split bill for hidden user #32166
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0a0f592
Allow split bill for hidden user
dukenv0307 cd5fa9c
remove un-use function
dukenv0307 f109a3c
update hidden for native
dukenv0307 52efc96
Merge branch 'main' into fix/31792
dukenv0307 2aafb7a
add hidden for display name native component
dukenv0307 bab320b
add title for display name web component
dukenv0307 4ecea54
fix lint
dukenv0307 61bc06b
Merge branch 'main' into fix/31792
dukenv0307 e875e3c
merge main
dukenv0307 0a457f4
fix lint
dukenv0307 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -72,13 +72,10 @@ function MoneyRequestConfirmPage(props) { | |
const [receiptFile, setReceiptFile] = useState(); | ||
const participants = useMemo( | ||
() => | ||
_.chain(props.iou.participants) | ||
.map((participant) => { | ||
const isPolicyExpenseChat = lodashGet(participant, 'isPolicyExpenseChat', false); | ||
return isPolicyExpenseChat ? OptionsListUtils.getPolicyExpenseReportOption(participant) : OptionsListUtils.getParticipantsOption(participant, props.personalDetails); | ||
}) | ||
.filter((participant) => !!participant.login || !!participant.text) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Remove the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @s77rt I updated. |
||
.value(), | ||
_.map(props.iou.participants, (participant) => { | ||
const isPolicyExpenseChat = lodashGet(participant, 'isPolicyExpenseChat', false); | ||
return isPolicyExpenseChat ? OptionsListUtils.getPolicyExpenseReportOption(participant) : OptionsListUtils.getParticipantsOption(participant, props.personalDetails); | ||
}), | ||
[props.iou.participants, props.personalDetails], | ||
); | ||
const isPolicyExpenseChat = useMemo(() => ReportUtils.isPolicyExpenseChat(ReportUtils.getRootParentReport(props.report)), [props.report]); | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this seems to be only needed for Native?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@s77rt Because in native
DisplayNames
component render the text which isfullTitle
here. On other platforms, we usedisplayNamesWithTooltips
props which already setHidden
fordisplayName
field ingetDisplayNameForParticipant
functionApp/src/components/OptionRow.js
Line 115 in a0b2197
App/src/components/OptionRow.js
Line 221 in a0b2197
App/src/components/DisplayNames/index.native.tsx
Line 13 in a0b2197
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see. But the suggested solution does not fix the bug. I think the
DisplayNames
component on itself is inconsistent as theshouldUseFullTitle
prop is only available on non-native.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have any suggestions? I think we only have the bug for the participant case so we can fix this in
getIOUConfirmationOptionsFromParticipants
function.What do you think about add
Hidden
as default value here.App/src/components/OptionRow.js
Line 114 in a0b2197
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add the
Hidden
as a default in DisplayNames instead? I think that would make more senseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we will add
Hidden
as default in nativeDisplayNames
right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that seems safer as OptionRow is a generic component where
Hidden
may not be wantedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@s77rt Updated.