Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement card section for subscription #42787

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor

@pasyukevich pasyukevich commented May 29, 2024

Details

To access this newly created component, paste the following link into the browser

https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/settings/subscription

or add this effect to InitialSettingsPage.tsx

useEffect(() => {
    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SETTINGS_SUBSCRIPTION)
}, [])

Fixed Issues

$ #38616
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Login into the app
  2. Open 'Subscription' page
  3. Verify that the section is rendered correctly from the desktop and browser, "Add payment card" showed
  4. Verify that the section is rendered correctly from the mobile, reduced functionality message and add payment card showed
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests section above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screenshot_1717423957

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screenshot_1717424105

iOS: Native

image

iOS: mWeb Safari image
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image
MacOS: Desktop image

Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left comments.

@pasyukevich pasyukevich marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2024 13:55
@pasyukevich pasyukevich requested review from a team as code owners June 3, 2024 13:55
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team June 3, 2024 13:56
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 3, 2024

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from s77rt June 3, 2024 13:56
src/styles/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
subscriptionCardIcon: {
padding: 10,
backgroundColor: theme.border,
borderRadius: 10,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where are these values coming from? cc @dannymcclain @dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It maybe looks like these styles are for this little guy?

image

And I'm assuming that the 10px padding is coming from the fact that the container is 40px and the icon is 20px, though I would probably just set an explicit width and height on the container and let the icon sit in the center (but maybe that's just me).

The border radius should definitely be using one of our variables—and it should be equal to 8px.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, I agree that the border radius should be 8 and that we should just vertically/horizontally center the icon within the space if we can.

src/styles/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -2791,6 +2795,16 @@ const styles = (theme: ThemeColors) =>
color: theme.textSupporting,
},

sectionListMutedInfo: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you show a screenshot of what these styles do exactly?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed and updated to existing styles

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it was used for the message above "Add card" block

image

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Jun 3, 2024

  • On native the card description overflows and wraps making the card icon not well positioned
  • On web the card description overflows and clips and the three dots button is not aligned
Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 6 08 02 PM Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 6 08 56 PM

@pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor Author

fixed

image
image

@pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt PR updated

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

These card icons should be using our icon color. Looks like they're using our text color right now.

CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 10 21 56@2x
CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 10 22 09@2x

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

should the "Card ending..." part be in bold text as well?

Ah yes it should. Good catch. That's what we have in Figma as well. 👍

CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 10 34 59@2x

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Ah snap. I just realized my comment here is incorrect.

Super sorry about that. Here are some labels to help out:

Payment card added
CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 10 36 35@2x

No payment card added (app)
CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 10 37 41@2x

Let me know if you have any questions, with all the different states things can get a bit confusing!

@pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dannymcclain @shawnborton

Icon colour and card title were fixed
image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Lovely! Minor nitpick but the gap between top text and bottom text doesn't seem to match what we're doing for the bank account row, in case we want those to be identical. In the bank account row, looks like we're adding 4px of top margin on the smaller gray label text below (2nd line)

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Jun 4, 2024

The icon background color does not match the design
Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 5 43 58 PM

Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 5 44 44 PM

Also the month is not formatted (not written in letters)

[translate],
);

const handleIconPress = useCallback(() => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function name should explicitly reflect what it does e.g. calculateAndSetThreeDotsMenuPosition

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed

@narefyev91 narefyev91 mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024
50 tasks
@pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt The calculation of the next payment will be added among with API integration and related screens - #38617

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Jun 5, 2024

@pasyukevich I'm referring to the card icon background color and the month format. Also I just noticed that the spacing is different too (between the header text and the card row)

@pasyukevich
Copy link
Contributor Author

pasyukevich commented Jun 5, 2024

@s77rt Background color, month format and offsets were updated


const defaultCard = useMemo(() => Object.values(fundList ?? {}).find((card) => card.isDefault), [fundList]);

const cardMonth = useMemo(() => DateUtils.getMonthNames(preferredLocale)[(defaultCard?.accountData?.cardMonth ?? 1) - 1], [defaultCard, preferredLocale]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const cardMonth = useMemo(() => DateUtils.getMonthNames(preferredLocale)[(defaultCard?.accountData?.cardMonth ?? 1) - 1], [defaultCard, preferredLocale]);
const cardMonth = useMemo(() => DateUtils.getMonthNames(preferredLocale)[(defaultCard?.accountData?.cardMonth ?? 1) - 1], [defaultCard?.accountData?.cardMonth, preferredLocale]);

NAB

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated


const defaultCard = useMemo(() => Object.values(fundList ?? {}).find((card) => card.isDefault), [fundList]);

const cardMonth = useMemo(() => DateUtils.getMonthNames(preferredLocale)[(defaultCard?.accountData?.cardMonth ?? 1) - 1], [defaultCard, preferredLocale]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does accountData.cardMonth start at 1?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so

@amyevans Could you confirm this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cardMonth starts at 1, yes.

I don't understand the data source though (.isDefault, defaultCard?.accountData?). Are these just placeholders or is it supposed to be real data at this point? This is what should be used 😄 -
payment-card-data

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amyevans Is that screenshot up to date? According to onyx types fundList is an object, it has isDefault field and the objects shown in your screenshot are nested inside accountData

Copy link
Contributor

@blimpich blimpich Jun 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Talked about this internally, we're not correctly populating the fundList onyx key in the backend. We're working on fixing it. @pasyukevich can you changed this back to what you had before? Then I think we're good to merge.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@blimpich reverted

Comment on lines 2839 to 2840
height: 40,
width: 40,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
height: 40,
width: 40,
height: variables.iconSizeExtraLarge,
width: variables.iconSizeExtraLarge,

NAB

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

Comment on lines 2847 to 2848
height: 40,
width: 40,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same ^

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Jun 5, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native android android 2
Android: mWeb Chrome

Networking issue

iOS: Native ios
iOS: mWeb Safari mweb-safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Let's merge after this is confirmed #42787 (comment)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from blimpich June 5, 2024 13:53
@blimpich blimpich merged commit 05bcf8a into Expensify:main Jun 6, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.81-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants