Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix wrong scrolling in Search list when navigating by keyboard #43490

Conversation

Kicu
Copy link
Contributor

@Kicu Kicu commented Jun 11, 2024

Details

Root cause

Done:

  • I've added 2 new optional props to SelectionList interface:
    • callback getter that returns specific item heights
    • height of any extra header if it's provided
  • I memoized the function getHeight because it was called at least 3 times per item per render, which for me meant 200-500 calls - feels like a lot
  • added extra filter for ReportItems so that we do not return "widows" without any transactions, which screwed up focusing by keyboard (as there were null items with height 0)

Fixed Issues

$ #43362
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • go to Search
  • use keyboard to navigate over search list items - Tab key, and also up and down keyboard keys
  • the focus and scroll should work correctly

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
rec-web-sorting-scroll.mp4
rec-web-mobile-sorting.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review June 11, 2024 16:09
Copy link
Contributor

@filip-solecki filip-solecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Kicu Kicu force-pushed the kicu/43362-sorting-scrolling-fix branch from 3d3743e to 8575219 Compare June 12, 2024 11:43
@Kicu Kicu marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2024 11:46
@Kicu Kicu requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 11:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and removed request for a team June 12, 2024 11:46
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2024

@fedirjh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@@ -155,7 +157,7 @@ function getReportSections(data: OnyxTypes.SearchResults['data']): ReportListIte
}
}

return Object.values(reportIDToTransactions);
return Object.values(reportIDToTransactions).filter((item) => item.transactions?.length !== 0);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We started filtering this on the backend, so we shouldn't have to do it in the frontend anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough but I found such cases that fallen into this if: https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/components/SelectionList/Search/ReportListItem.tsx#L82 or the other one.

At lest for me I can see empty list elements.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I put up a fix for this, so we should be able to remove the filter once my fix is deployed.

Comment on lines +39 to +41
const transactionItemMobileHeight = 100;
const reportItemTransactionHeight = 52;
const listItemPadding = 12; // this is equivalent to 'mb3' on every transaction/report list item
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB This feels brittle since if the height changes we would introduce the bug again. That being said, I'm not sure how to solve it this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly same for me. We could in some way extract the same variable from styles perhaps and use, but still you would have to change it in two places.

I agree that its brittle but I see no other simple solution. padding affects item height, and correct item height has to be pushed down to RN List

luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh all yours

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Bump @fedirjh for review

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.12.36.03.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.12.43.23.mp4
iOS: Native
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.12.04.52.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.12.12.07.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.11.01.55.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.11.24.12.mp4
CleanShot.2024-06-18.at.11.24.51.mp4

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2024

@Kicu The navigation using the TAB key is not smooth; it feels there is a delay:

CleanShot.2024-06-14.at.14.03.15.mp4

src/components/Search.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 17, 2024

@fedirjh do you mind checking if the same feeling when using TAB appears also on main, and if not then can we move forward?
The purpose of this PR was not to affect how moving looks, nor speed it up - it fixes a specific bug that made this navigation almost impossible (because the scroll would behave badly).
I have not really tried to improve the speed yet - that would be a different task I think

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jun 17, 2024

do you mind checking if the same feeling when using TAB appears also on main, and if not then can we move forward?

@Kicu Yes it seems this behavior is happening on main as well.


There is another bug with scrolling, it took several clicks to navigate between the first item and the second (3-4 clicks)

CleanShot.2024-06-17.at.09.59.11.mp4

Also, the scrolling behavior looks weird; sometimes it takes two or three clicks to navigate to the next item:

CleanShot.2024-06-17.at.10.01.31.mp4

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 17, 2024

Yeah I'm pretty sure I understand what happens 👍 Unfortunately there are empty "invisible" items on this list, and I was not sure if its only for me or is this more common.

Now that I know I will filter them out and that should help.
@luacmartins please take a look at the videos here: #43490 (comment) - it seems like the case there there is a report item but no transactions is more common. I will filter them out in Frontend, but if you can maybe you should investigate why this happens.

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 17, 2024

@fedirjh please re-check, the weird navigation behaviour should be fixed

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Jun 17, 2024

please re-check, the weird navigation behaviour should be fixed

@Kicu Yep results look good so far. navigating between items is now fixed. For scrolling, there is still a little weirdness, the list sometimes scrolls up and down when you have a large item in the list: I think this is related to the fact that we have two scrolling behaviors implemented at the same time :

  1. SectionList auto-scrolls when an item is focused:
  2. scrollToIndex that scrolls to the index of the selected element, it's triggered through the useArrowKeyFocusManager

I think we probably should disable the SectionList auto-scrolls on item focus behavior. I am not sure it that's possible, though.

CleanShot.2024-06-17.at.10.56.13.mp4

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 17, 2024

will look into this later today or tomorrow and ping you

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins please take a look at the videos here: #43490 (comment) - it seems like the case there there is a report item but no transactions is more common. I will filter them out in Frontend, but if you can maybe you should investigate why this happens.

I'll take a look since we should be filtering those in the backend.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

I put up a PR to fix the report without transactions issue. You can remove the filtering in the frontend again since the fix for that issue is in the backend.

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review June 17, 2024 18:31
src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 18, 2024

@fedirjh I looked at the scrolling behaviors in our SelectionList. In general I think you're right that we have both native SectionList scrolling and our own mechanisms, but without it the items focused via Tab key and items focused when using keyboard will desynchronize.
As for disabling the native scrolling index in SectionList I don't think its possible.

That being said I think this is a bigger problem and this behaviour that we see here is what happens everywhere in the app where SelectionList is being used. Check for example my video - items are the same height, but the scrolling behavior still happens on every keystroke.

rec-web-sorting.mp4

I think the only difference here is that Search is currently the only list in Expensify where items can have different heights. Other than that, this is simply how SelectionList behaves.
I'm reluctant to change core behaviors of SelectionList right now, perhaps we should plan this for future as an improvement.

CC @luacmartins
Everything else should be fixed.
Filtering of empty items is removed because it will be fixed by backend as requested.
This means that the bug with keyboard sometimes requiring more than 1 keystroke to navigate to next item is expected on this PR right now.

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Over to you @luacmartins

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins June 18, 2024 15:42
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit abc9882 into Expensify:main Jun 18, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Jun 20, 2024

This PR is failing because of issue #43362

The issue is reproducible in: Web and Desktop

1718884561366.Fix_wrong_scrolling_in_Search_list_when_navigating_by_keyboard.mp4
1718886939047.43490_desktop.mp4

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Jun 20, 2024

@kbecciv Sorry but I'm not sure I understand. This PR was specifically fixing the issue that you mention: #43362
I tested it against this exact scenario and it worked.

Right now I re-tested current main branch and I'm not able to reproduce the behavior in your videos.
What we can see in your videos is exactly the state of the bug before this PR was merged.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.0.0-9 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants