-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add pending status #135
add pending status #135
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new conditional check in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
omnistrate_tests/classes/omnistrate_fleet_instance.py (1)
439-443
: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The addition of the "PENDING" status handling is a good improvement to the upgrade process monitoring. It provides more granular status updates and maintains consistency with the existing code structure.
Consider adjusting the indentation of the "IN_PROGRESS" block to maintain the correct control flow:
if status == "PENDING": logging.info("Upgrade pending") time.sleep(10) logging.info("Waiting for instance to be ready") -if status == "IN_PROGRESS": +elif status == "IN_PROGRESS": logging.info("Upgrade in progress") time.sleep(10) logging.info("Waiting for instance to be ready")This change ensures that the "IN_PROGRESS" check is part of the same if-elif chain as the "PENDING" check, which appears to be the intended logic.
fix #134
Summary by CodeRabbit