Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: raise UndefinedKey exception on user decision #130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

FelixTheC
Copy link
Owner

closes #129

@FelixTheC FelixTheC self-assigned this Dec 4, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c830ec7) 90.44% compared to head (2705d39) 90.57%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           py_3_12     #130      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    90.44%   90.57%   +0.13%     
===========================================
  Files           28       28              
  Lines         3120     3142      +22     
===========================================
+ Hits          2822     2846      +24     
+ Misses         298      296       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FelixTheC FelixTheC linked an issue Dec 4, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@FelixTheC FelixTheC merged commit bd6f82c into py_3_12 Dec 4, 2023
6 of 8 checks passed
@FelixTheC FelixTheC deleted the origin/129-errors-for-undefined-keys-typed_dict branch December 4, 2023 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Are there errors for undefined keys?
1 participant