Team Bill Of Materials UI

[cstns]

Description

• updated the api to include device/instance status
• centralized application bom components and reused them in both team and app bom
• styling
• altered the ff accordion to programmatically hide it's content instead of altering it's display property
• truncate versions instances and add a show more button
• add a version counter to each dependency
• toggle dependency package versions
• make the dependency items start in a closed state on the team bom

Related Issue(s)

closes #4823

Checklist

• I have read the contribution guidelines
• Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
• Documentation has been updated
  • Upgrade instructions
  • Configuration details
  • Concepts
• Changes flowforge.yml?
  • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
  • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

• Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.69%. Comparing base (b545283) to head (66d50a0).
Report is 76 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4872      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.74%   78.69%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         323      323              
  Lines       15221    15242      +21     
  Branches     3496     3504       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        11986    11994       +8     
- Misses       3235     3248      +13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	78.69% <100.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[joepavitt]

Based on our chat this morning, I wasn't expecting this ready so soon - just checking it's actually ready for review, before I dive in?

[cstns]

Not yet! I did not start to change the ff-accordion. Will mark the pr as draft until i address it.

For visibility, I have reservations of using the existing layout as is because the ff-accordion does not programmatically hide it's contents which means they would get rendered in the dom each time even though not visible. This would have negative impact on big payloads and could cause the page to freeze

[joepavitt]

@cstns ready for review?

[cstns]

Yes!

[joepavitt]

Added sorting for the version numbers within the first accordian