Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Clearer DNS instructions and cross-linking #4886

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joepavitt
Copy link
Contributor

Description

We're losing an estimated 93% of traffic to the first step in our self-hosted install instructions for our "Quick Start" guide. This attempts to remedy the step/intimidation of setting up a DNS server in Step 1, which will hopefully improve conversion here.

@ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

Technically it looks fine.
However, this increases the complexity of quick-start documentation and the whole setup process. Not quite convinced about this change.

You can merge it whenever you feel it's ready to be made publicly available.

@joepavitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

joepavitt commented Dec 6, 2024

However, this increases the complexity of quick-start documentation and the whole setup process. Not quite convinced about this change.

How does it though? Currently, step 1 is setup a DNS server and get yourself a domain, which is a big step putting off 93% of visitors... the plan here is to provide the non-DNS route for quicker onboarding?

I'd even go as far as saying bin DNS option in quick start entirely, and just present the non-DNS option

@ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

The current approach requires one to have a Fully Qualified Domain Name with the possibility to modify its DNS records. It does not require to setup a DNS server.
No-DNS approach requires one to use an external service and the way this service works might lead users to questions like: Which IP address should I put there? How can I check what is my IP?
Alternatively, if they cannot afford an FQDN, they can still use FlowFuse Cloud to evaluate the product. Maybe we should put a link to the FFC registration page?

I might be wrong, but I feel that we might not benefit much from this change. On the other hand, given the high failure rate, we probably won’t lose much either.

@hardillb
Copy link
Contributor

@joepavitt Can we publish this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants