[![Travis Status][trav_img]][trav_site] [![Appveyor Status][av_img]][av_site] [![Coverage Status][cov_img]][cov_site] ![Maintenance Status][maintenance-image]
Builder takes your npm
tasks and makes them composable, controllable from
a single point, and flexible.
npm
is fantastic for controlling tasks (via scripts
) and general project
workflows. But a project-specific package.json
simply doesn't scale when
you're managing many (say 5-50) very similar repositories.
Enter Builder. Builder is "almost" npm
, but provides for off-the-shelf
"archetypes" to provide central sets of package.json
scripts
tasks, and
dependencies
and devDependencies
for those tasks. The rest of this page will
dive into the details and machinations of the tool, but first here are a few of
the rough goals and motivations behind the project.
- Single Point of Control: A way to define a specific set of tasks / configs / etc. for one "type" of project. For example, we have an ever-expanding set of related repos for our Victory project which all share a nearly-identical dev / prod / build workflow.
- Flexibility: There are a number of meta tools for controlling JavaScript workflows / development lifecycles. However, most are of the "buy the farm" nature. This works great when everything is within the workflow but falls apart once you want to be "just slightly" different. Builder solves this by allowing fine grain task overriding by name, where the larger composed tasks still stay the same and allow a specific repo's deviation from "completely off the shelf" to be painless.
- You Can Give Up: One of the main goals of builder is to remain very
close to a basic
npm
workflow. So much so, that we include a section in this guide on how to abandon the use of Builder in a project and revert everything from archetypes back to vanillanpm
package.json
scripts
,dependencies
anddevDependencies
. - A Few "Nice to Haves" Over
npm run <task>
: Setting aside archetypes and multi-project management,builder
provides cross-OS compatible helpers for common task running scenarios like concurrent execution (concurrent
) and spawning the same tasks in parallel with different environment variables (env
). It also provides useful controls for task retries, buffered output, setup tasks, etc.
Contents:
- Overview
- Tasks
- npm Config
- Archetypes
- Tips, Tricks, & Notes
At a high level builder
is a tool for consuming package.json
scripts
commands, providing sensible / flexible defaults, and supporting various scenarios
("archetypes") for your common use cases across multiple projects.
Builder is not opinionated, although archetypes are and typically dictate file structure, standard configurations, and dev workflows. Builder supports this in an agnostic way, providing essentially the following:
NODE_PATH
,PATH
enhancements and module patterns to run, build, import from archetypes so task dependencies and configurations don't have to be installed directly in a root project.- A task runner capable of single tasks (
run
) or multiple concurrent tasks (concurrent
). - An intelligent merging of
package.json
scripts
tasks.
... and that's about it!
To start using builder, install and save builder
and any archetypes you
intend to use. We'll use the [builder-react-component][] archetype as an
example.
Note: Most archetypes have an ARCHETYPE
package and parallel
ARCHETYPE-dev
npm package. The ARCHETYPE
package contains almost
everything needed for the archetype (prod dependencies, scripts, etc.) except
for the devDependencies
which the latter ARCHETYPE-dev
package is solely
responsible for bringing in.
For ease of use, one option is to globally install builder
and locally install
archetypes:
$ npm install -g builder
$ npm install --save builder-react-component
$ npm install --save-dev builder-react-component-dev
Like a global install of any Node.js meta / task runner tool (e.g., eslint
,
mocha
, gulp
, grunt
) doing a global install is painful because:
- You are tied to just one version of the tool for all projects.
- You must also globally install the tool in CI, on servers, etc.
... so instead, we strongly recommend a local install described in the next section!
To help you keep up with project-specific builder requirements, a globally-installed
builder
will detect if a locally-installed version of builder
is
available and switch to that instead:
$ /GLOBAL/PATH/TO/builder
[builder:local-detect] Switched to local builder at: ./node_modules/builder/bin/builder-core.js
... now using local builder! ...
To avoid tying yourself to a single, global version of builder
, the option
that we endorse is locally installing both builder
and archetypes:
$ npm install --save builder
$ npm install --save builder-react-component
$ npm install --save-dev builder-react-component-dev
However, to call builder
from the command line you will either need to either
augment PATH
or call the long form of the command:
Our recommended approach is to augment your PATH
variable with a shell
configuration as follows:
Mac / Linux
# Safer version, but if you _have_ global installs, those come first.
export PATH="${PATH}:./node_modules/.bin"
# (OR) Less safe, but guarantees local node modules come first.
export PATH="./node_modules/.bin:${PATH}"
# Check results with:
echo $PATH
To make these changes permanent, add the export
command to your .bashrc
or analogous shell configuration file.
Windows
# Safer version, but if you _have_ global installs, those come first.
set PATH=%PATH%;node_modules\.bin
# (OR) Less safe, but guarantees local node modules come first.
set PATH=node_modules\.bin;%PATH%
# Check results with:
echo %PATH%
To make these changes permanent, please see this multi-OS article on
changing the PATH
variable: https://www.java.com/en/download/help/path.xml
(the article is targeted for a Java executable, but it's analogous to our
situation). You'll want to paste in ;node_modules\.bin
at the end or
node_modules\.bin;
at the beginning of the PATH field in the gui. If there
is no existing PATH
then add a user entry with node_modules\.bin
as a value.
(It is unlikely to be empty because an npm
installation on Windows sets the
user PATH
analogously.)
Or you can run the complete path to the builder script with:
Mac / Linux
node_modules/.bin/builder <action> <task>
Windows
node_modules\.bin\builder <action> <task>
After builder
is available, you can edit .builderrc
like:
---
archetypes:
- builder-react-component
to bind archetypes.
... and from here you are set for builder
-controlled meta goodness!
Display general or command-specific help (which shows available specific flags).
$ builder [-h|--help|help]
$ builder help <action>
$ builder help <archetype>
Run builder help <action>
for all available options. Version information is
available with:
$ builder [-v|--version]
Let's dive a little deeper into the main builder actions:
Run a single task from script
. Analogous to npm run <task>
$ builder run <task>
Flags:
--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default:1
)--setup
: Single task to run for the entirety of<action>
--quiet
: Silence logging--log-level
: Level to log at (debug
,info
,warn
,error
,none
) (default:error
)--env
: JSON object of keys to add to environment.--env-path
: JSON file path of keys to add to environment.--expand-archetype
: Expandnode_modules/<archetype>
with full path (default:false
)--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default:.builderrc
)
Run multiple tasks from script
concurrently. Roughly analogous to
npm run <task1> & npm run <task2> & npm run <task3>
, but kills all processes on
first non-zero exit (which makes it suitable for test tasks), unless --no-bail
is provided.
$ builder concurrent <task1> <task2> <task3>
Flags:
--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default:1
)--setup
: Single task to run for the entirety of<action>
.- Note: The
--setup
task is run at the start of the first main task to actually run. This may not be the first specified task however, aspre
tasks could end up with main tasks starting out of order.
- Note: The
--queue
: Number of concurrent processes to run (default: unlimited -0|null
)--[no-]buffer
: Buffer output until process end (default:false
)--[no-]bail
: End all processes after the first failure (default:true
)--quiet
: Silence logging--log-level
: Level to log at (debug
,info
,warn
,error
,none
) (default:error
)--env
: JSON object of keys to add to environment.--env-path
: JSON file path of keys to add to environment.--expand-archetype
: Expandnode_modules/<archetype>
with full path (default:false
)--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default:.builderrc
)
Note that tries
will retry individual tasks that are part of the concurrent
group, not the group itself. So, if builder concurrent --tries=3 foo bar baz
is run and bar fails twice, then only bar
would be retried. foo
and baz
would only execute once if successful.
Run a single task from script
concurrently for each item in an array of different
environment variables. Roughly analogous to:
$ FOO=VAL1 npm run <task> & FOO=VAL2 npm run <task> & FOO=VAL3 npm run <task>
... but kills all processes on first non-zero exit (which makes it suitable for
test tasks), unless --no-bail
is provided. Usage:
$ builder envs <task> <json-array>
$ builder envs <task> --envs-path=<path-to-json-file>
Examples:
Mac / Linux
$ builder envs <task> '[{ "FOO": "VAL1" }, { "FOO": "VAL2" }, { "FOO": "VAL3" }]'
$ builder envs <task> '[{ "FOO": "VAL1", "BAR": "VAL2" }, { "FOO": "VAL3" }]'
Mac / Linux / Windows
$ builder envs <task> "[{ \"FOO\": \"VAL1\" }, { \"FOO\": \"VAL2\" }, { \"FOO\": \"VAL3\" }]"
$ builder envs <task> "[{ \"FOO\": \"VAL1\", \"BAR\": \"VAL2\" }, { \"FOO\": \"VAL3\" }]"
Flags:
--tries
: Number of times to attempt a task (default:1
)--setup
: Single task to run for the entirety of<action>
- Note: The
--setup
task is run at the start of the first main task to actually run. This may not be the first specified task however, aspre
tasks could end up with main tasks per environment object starting out of order.
- Note: The
--queue
: Number of concurrent processes to run (default: unlimited -0|null
)--[no-]buffer
: Buffer output until process end (default:false
)--[no-]bail
: End all processes after the first failure (default:true
)--envs-path
: Path to JSON env variable array file (default:null
)--quiet
: Silence logging--log-level
: Level to log at (debug
,info
,warn
,error
,none
) (default:error
)--env
: JSON object of keys to add to environment.--env-path
: JSON file path of keys to add to environment.--expand-archetype
: Expandnode_modules/<archetype>
with full path (default:false
)--builderrc
: Path to builder config file (default:.builderrc
)
Note: The environments JSON array will overwrite existing values in the
environment. This includes environment variables provided to / from builder
from things such as npm
config
and the --env
/--env-path
flags.
So, for example, if you invoke builder
with:
$ builder envs <task> '[{"FOO": "ENVS"}]' --env='{"FOO": "FLAG"}'
The environment variable FOO
will have a value of "ENVS"
with the single
environment object array item given to builder envs
overriding the --env
flag value.
A task specified in --setup <task>
will have the following flags apply to
the setup task as apply to the main task:
--env
--env-path
--quiet
--log-level
The following flags do not apply to a setup task:
--
custom flags--tries
--expand-archetype
--queue
--buffer
That said, if you need things like --tries
, etc., these can be always coded
into a wrapped task like:
"scripts": {
"setup-alone": "while sleep 1; do echo SETUP; done",
"setup": "builder run --tries=5 setup-alone",
"test": "mocha",
"test-full": "builder run --setup=setup test"
}
Builder executes pre<task>
and post<task>
tasks the same as npm
does,
with some perhaps not completely obvious corner cases.
If you have:
"scripts": {
"prefoo": "echo PRE",
"foo": "echo TEMP",
"postfoo": "echo POST"
}
And run builder run foo
, then just like npm
, builder will run in order:
prefoo
foo
postfoo
assuming each task succeeds, otherwise execution is terminated.
pre
and post
tasks can be provided in an archetype and overridden in a root
package.json
in the exact same manner as normal Builder tasks.
builder run
works essentially the same as npm run
. Things get a little
messy with Builder's other execution options:
builder envs
runs pre|post
tasks exactly once regardless of how many
concurrent executions of the underlying task (with different environment
variables) occur.
builder concurrent
runs appropriate pre|post
tasks for each independent
task. So, for something like:
"scripts": {
"prefoo": "echo PRE FOO",
"foo": "echo TEMP FOO",
"postfoo": "echo POST FOO",
"prebar": "echo PRE BAR",
"bar": "echo TEMP BAR",
"postbar": "echo POST BAR"
}
running builder concurrent foo bar
would run all of the above tasks at
the appropriate lifecycle moment.
Note that things like a --queue=NUM
limit on a concurrent task will have
all of the pre
, main, and post
task need to finish serial execution before
the next spot is freed up.
The --bail
flag applies to all of a single tasks pre
, main, and post
group. So if any of those fail, it's as if the main task failed.
Applicable Flags
When executing a <task>
that has pre<task>
and/or post<task>
entries, the
following execution flags do apply to the pre|post
tasks.
--env
--env-path
--quiet
--log-level
--expand-archetype
These flags have mixed application:
--queue
: Applies forconcurrent
, but notenvs
. The flag is invalid forrun
.--buffer
: Applies forconcurrent
, but notenvs
. The flag is invalid forrun
.--bail
: Applies forconcurrent
, but notenvs
. The flag is invalid forrun
. Apre<task>
,<task>
, and apost<task>
are treated as a group, so a failure of any short-circuits the rests and ends with failures. But with--bail=false
a failure doesn't stop execution of the other groups.
The following flags do not apply to pre/post tasks:
--
custom flags--tries
--setup
: A task specified in--setup <task>
will not havepre|post
tasks apply.
We will explain a few of these situations in a bit more depth:
Custom Flags
The special --
flag with any subsequent custom flags to the underlying task
are only passed to the the main <task>
and not pre<task>
or post<task>
.
The rationale here is that custom command line flags most likely just apply to
a single shell command (the main one).
So, for example
"scripts": {
"prefoo": "echo PRE",
"foo": "echo TEMP",
"postfoo": "echo POST"
}
running builder run foo -- --hi
would produce:
PRE
TEMP --hi
POST
Other Flags
By contrast, the various other Builder-specific flags that can be applied to a
task like --env
, etc., will apply to pre|post
tasks, under the
assumption that control flags + environment variables will most likely want to
be used for the execution of all commands in the workflow.
So, for example:
"scripts": {
"prefoo": "echo PRE $VAR",
"foo": "echo TEMP $VAR",
"postfoo": "echo POST $VAR"
}
running builder run foo --env '{"VAR":"HI"}'
would produce:
PRE HI
TEMP HI
POST HI
For the above example, if you have a task named preprefoo
, then running
foo
or even prefoo
directly will not run preprefoo
. Builder
follows npm
's current implementation which is roughly "add pre|post
tasks
to current execution as long as the task itself is not prefixed with
pre|post
". (Note that yarn
does not follow this logic in task execution).
Just like npm run <task> [-- <args>...]
,
flags after a --
token in a builder task or from the command line are passed
on to the underlying tasks. This is slightly more complicated for builder in
that composed tasks pass on the flags all the way down. So, for tasks like:
"scripts": {
"down": "echo down",
"way": "builder run down -- --way",
"the": "builder run way -- --the",
"all": "builder run the -- --all"
}
We can run some basics (alone and with a user-added flag):
$ builder run down
down
$ builder run down -- --my-custom-flag
down --my-custom-flag
If we run the composed commands, the --
flags are accumulated:
$ builder run all
down --way --the --all
$ builder run all -- --my-custom-flag
down --way --the --all --my-custom-flag
The rough heuristic here is if we have custom arguments:
- If a
builder <action>
command, pass through using builder-specific environment variables. (Builder uses_BUILDER_ARGS_CUSTOM_FLAGS
). - If a non-
builder
command, then append without--
token.
Builder tasks often refer to configuration files in the archetype itself like:
"postinstall": "webpack --bail --config node_modules/<archetype>/config/webpack/webpack.config.js",
In npm v2 this wasn't a problem because dependencies were usually nested. In npm v3, this all changes with aggressive flattening of dependencies. With flattened dependencies, the chance that the archetype and its dependencies no longer have a predictable contained structure increases.
Thus, commands like the above succeed if the installation ends up like:
node_modules/
<a module>/
node_modules/
<archetype>/
node_modules/
webpack/
If npm flattens the tree like:
node_modules/
<a module>/
<archetype>/
webpack/
Then builder
can still find webpack
due to its PATH
and NODE_PATH
mutations. But an issue arises with something like a postinstall
step after
this flattening in that the current working directory of the process will be
PATH/TO/node_modules/<a module>/
, which in this flattened scenario would
not find the file:
node_modules/<archetype>/config/webpack/webpack.config.js
because relative to node_modules/<a module>/
it is now at:
../<archetype>/config/webpack/webpack.config.js
To address this problem builder
has an --expand-archetype
flag that will
replace an occurrence of the specific node_modules/<archetype>
in one of the
archetype commands with the full path to the archetype, to guarantee
referenced files are correctly available.
The basic heuristic of things to replace is:
^node_modules/<archetype>
: Token is very first string.[\s\t]node_modules/<archetype>
: Whitespace before token.['"]node_modules/<archetype>
: Quotes before token.- Note that the path coming back from the underlying
require.resolve(module)
will likely be escaped, so things like whitespace in a path + quotes around it may not expand correctly.
- Note that the path coming back from the underlying
Some notes:
- The only real scenario you'll need this is for a module that needs to run
a
postinstall
or something as part of an install in a larger project. Root git clone projects controlled by an archetype should work just fine because the archetype will be predictably located at:node_modules/<archetype>
- The
--expand-archetype
flag gets propagated down to all composedbuilder
commands internally. - The
--expand-archetype
only expands the specific archetype string for its own commands and not those in the root projects or other archetypes. - The replacement assumes you are using
/
forward slash characters which are the recommended cross-platform way to construct file paths (even on windows). - The replacement only replaces at the start of a command string or after
whitespace. This means it won't replace
../node_modules/<archetype>
or even./node_modules/<archetype>
. (In the last case, just omit the./
in front of a path -- it's a great habit to pick up as./
breaks on Windows and omitting./
works on all platforms!)
The underlying concept here is that builder
script
commands simply are
npm-friendly package.json
script
commands. Pretty much anything that you
can execute with npm run <task>
can be executed with builder run <task>
.
Builder can run 1+ tasks based out of package.json
scripts
. For a basic
scenario like:
{
"scripts": {
"foo": "echo FOO",
"bar": "echo BAR"
}
}
Builder can run these tasks individually:
$ builder run foo
$ builder run bar
Sequentially via ||
or &&
shell helpers:
$ builder run foo && builder run bar
Concurrently via the Builder built-in concurrent
command:
$ builder concurrent foo bar
With concurrent
, all tasks continue running until they all complete or
any task exits with a non-zero exit code, in which case all still alive tasks
are killed and the Builder process exits with the error code.
builder
supports package.json
config
properties the same way that npm
does, with slight enhancements in consideration of multiple package.json
's
in play.
As a refresher, npm
utilizes the config
field of package.json
to make
"per-package" environment variables to scripts
tasks. For example, if you
have:
{
"config": {
"my_name": "Bob"
},
"scripts": {
"get-name": "echo Hello, ${npm_package_config_my_name}."
}
}
and ran:
$ npm run get-name
Hello, Bob.
More documentation about how npm
does per-package configuration is at:
- https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#config
- https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/config#per-package-config-settings
In builder
, for a single package.json
this works essentially the same in
the above example.
$ builder run get-name
Hello, Bob.
However, builder
has the added complexity of adding in config
variables
from archetypes and the environment. So the basic resolution order for a
config environment variable is:
- Look to
npm_package_config_<VAR_NAME>=<VAR_VAL>
on command line. - If not set, then use
<root>/package.json:config:<VAR_NAME>
value. - If not set, then use
<archetype>/package.json:config:<VAR_NAME>
value.
So, let's dive in to a slightly more complex example:
// <archetype>/package.json
{
"config": {
"my_name": "ARCH BOB"
},
"scripts": {
"get-name": "echo Hello, ${npm_package_config_my_name}."
}
}
// <root>/package.json
{
"config": {
"my_name": "ROOT JANE"
}
}
When we run the builder
command, the <root>
value overrides:
$ builder run get-name
Hello, ROOT JANE.
We can inject a command line flag to override even this value:
$ npm_package_config_my_name="CLI JOE" builder run get-name
Hello, CLI JOE.
Note that the ability to override via the process environment is unique
to builder
and not available in real npm
.
Although config
properties can be something like:
"config": {
"enabled": true
}
We strongly recommend that you always set strings like:
"config": {
"enabled": "true"
}
And deal just with string values in your tasks, and files. The reasoning here is that when overriding values from the command line, the values will always be strings, which has a potential for messy, hard-to-diagnose bugs if the overridden value is not also a string.
npm
has additional functionality for config
values that are not
presently supported, such as issuing commands like
npm config set <pkg-name>:my_name Bill
that store values in ~/.npmrc
and
then override the package.json
values at execution time. We may extend
support for this as well, but not at the present.
npm
does not support overriding config
environment variables from the
actual environment. So doing something in our original example like:
$ npm_package_config_my_name=George npm run get-name
Hello, Bob.
In fact, npm will refuse to even add environment variables starting with
npm_package_config
to the npm run
environment. E.g.
{
"config": {},
"scripts": {
"get-npm-val": "echo NPM VAR: ${npm_package_config_var}",
"get-env-val": "echo ENV VAR: ${env_var}"
}
}
The npm
config variable doesn't make it through:
$ npm_package_config_var=SET npm run get-npm-val
NPM VAR:
While a normal environment variable will:
$ env_var=SET npm run get-env-val
ENV VAR: SET
By contrast, builder
does pass through environment variables already
existing on the command line, and moreover those overrides takes precedence over
the root and archetype package.json values. Those same examples with builder
show that the environment variables do make it through:
$ npm_package_config_var=SET builder run get-npm-val
NPM VAR: SET
$ env_var=SET builder run get-env-val
ENV VAR: SET
Things are a little more complex when using with builder envs
, but the
rough rule is that the environment JSON array wins when specified, otherwise
the existing environment is used:
$ npm_package_config_var=CLI builder envs get-npm-val --queue=1 \
'[{}, {"npm_package_config_var":"This Overrides"}]'
NPM VAR: CLI
NPM VAR: This Overrides
Archetypes deal with common scenarios for your projects. Like:
- [builder-react-component][]: A React component
- A React application server
- A Chai / jQuery / VanillaJS widget
Archetypes typically provide:
- A
package.json
withbuilder
-friendlyscript
tasks. - Dependencies and dev dependencies for all of the archetype
script
tasks. - Configuration files for all
script
tasks.
In most cases, you won't need to override anything. But, if you do, pick the
most granular scripts
command in the archetype you need to override and
define just that in your project's package.json
script
section. Copy
any configuration files that you need to tweak and re-define the command.
The easiest bet is to just have one archetype per project. But, multiple are
supported. In terms of scripts
tasks, we end up with the following example:
ROOT/package.json
ROOT/node_modules/ARCHETYPE_ONE/package.json
ROOT/node_modules/ARCHETYPE_TWO/package.json
Say we have a .builderrc
like:
---
archetypes:
- ARCHETYPE_ONE
- ARCHETYPE_TWO
The resolution order for a script
task (say, foo
) present in all three
package.json
's would be the following:
- Look through
ROOT/package.json
then the configured archetypes in reverse order:ARCHETYPE_TWO/package.json
, thenARCHETYPE_ONE/package.json
for a matching taskfoo
- If found
foo
, check if it is a "pass-through" task, which means it delegates to a later instance -- basically"foo": "builder run foo"
. If so, then look to next instance of task found in order above.
Archetypes use conventional scripts
task names, except for the following
special cases:
"npm:postinstall"
"npm:preversion"
"npm:version"
"npm:test"
These tasks are specifically actionable during the npm
lifecycle, and
consequently, the archetype mostly ignores those for installation by default,
offering them up for actual use in your project.
We strongly recommend entirely
avoiding npm lifecycle task names
in your archetype package.json
files. So, instead of having:
// <archetype>/package.json
// Bad
"test": "builder concurrent --buffer test-frontend test-backend"
We recommend something like:
// <archetype>/package.json
// Good / OK
"npm:test": "builder run test-all",
"test-all": "builder concurrent --buffer test-frontend test-backend"
// Also OK
"npm:test": "builder concurrent --buffer test-frontend test-backend"
and then in your <root>/package.json
using the real lifecycle task name.
"test": "builder run npm:test"
Moving common tasks into an archetype is fairly straightforward and requires just a few tweaks to the paths defined in configuration and scripts in order to work correctly.
An archetype is simply a standard npm module with a valid package.json
. To set
up a new archetype from scratch, make a directory for your new archetype,
initialize npm
and link it for ease of development.
$ cd path/to/new/archetype
$ npm init
$ npm link
From your consuming project, you can now link to the archetype directly for ease
of development after including it in your dependencies
and creating a
.builderrc
as outlined above in configuration.
$ cd path/to/consuming/project
$ npm link new-archetype-name
Because builder
archetypes are included as simple npm modules, two separate
npm modules are required for archetypes: one for normal dependencies and one for
dev dependencies. Whereas in a non-builder-archetype project you'd specify dev
dependencies in devDependencies
, with builder
all dev dependencies must be
regular dependencies
on a separate dev npm module.
builder
is designed so that when defining which archetypes to use in a
consuming project's .builderrc
, builder
will look for two modules, one named
appropriately in dependencies
(ex: my-archetype
) and one in
devDependencies
but with -dev
appended to the name (ex: my-archetype-dev
).
To help with managing these while building a builder archetype, install
builder-support
to create and manage a dev/
directory within your archetype project with it's
own package.json
which can be published as a separate npm module.
builder-support
will not only create a dev/package.json
with an appropriate
package name, but will also keep all the other information from your archetype's
primary package.json
up to date as well as keep README.md
and .gitignore
in parity for hosting the project as a separate npm module.
Get started by installing and running builder-support gen-dev
:
$ npm install builder-support --save-dev
$ ./node_modules/.bin/builder-support gen-dev
TIP: Create a task called "builder:gen-dev": "builder-support gen-dev"
in
your archetype to avoid having to type out the full path each time you update
your project's details.
For ease of development, npm link
the dev dependency separately:
$ cd dev
$ npm link
Then from your consuming project, you can link to the dev package.
$ cd path/to/consuming/project
$ npm link new-archetype-name-dev
Read the builder-support
docs
to learn more about how dev archetypes are easily managed with
builder-support gen-dev
.
As a background primer, whenever a file has a require("lib-name")
in it, Node
performs the following check for /path/to/ultimate/file.js
:
/path/to/ultimate/node_modules/lib-name
/path/to/node_modules/lib-name
/path/node_modules/lib-name
/node_modules/lib-name
After this, Node then checks for NODE_PATH
for additional paths to search.
This presents a potentially awkward pattern when combined with npm
deduplication / flattening for say a file like:
<root>/node_modules/<archetype>/config/my-config.js
that requires
lib-name@right-version
as follows:
Node modules layout:
<root>/
node_modules/
lib-name@wrong-version
<archetype>/
config/my-config.js // require("lib-name");
<archetype-dev>/
node_modules/
lib-name@right-version
This unfortunately means that the search path for require("lib-name")
is:
# From file path priority resolution
<root>/node_modules/<archetype>/config/node_modules
<root>/node_modules/<archetype>/node_modules
<root>/node_modules/node_modules
<root>/node_modules // Matches `lib-name@wrong-version`!!!
# Now, from `NODE_PATH`
<root>/node_modules/<archetype>/node_modules
<root>/node_modules/<archetype-dev>/node_modules // Too late for `right-version`.
To remedy this situation, we encourage a very simple pattern to have Node.js
require
's start from the dev archetype when appropriate by adding a one-line
file to the dev archetype: <archetype-dev>/require.js
// Contents of <archetype-dev>/require.js
module.exports = require;
By exporting the require
from the dev archetype, the resolution starts in the
dev archetype and thus ensures the dev archetype "wins" for the archetype tasks.
Thus in any archetype files that do a require
, simply switch to:
var mod = require("<archetype-dev>/require")("lib-name"); // Module
var modPath = require("<archetype-dev>/require").resolve("lib-name"); // Module path
And the dependency from the dev archetype is guaranteed to "win" no matter what happens with actual module layout from npm installation.
Note that because a file from within the normal <archetype>
will naturally
search <archetype>/node_modules
before hitting <root>/node_modules
you do
not need to use this require
pattern for normal archetype dependencies in
archetype Node.js files.
Node.js files in the normal production archetype do not need a
<archetype>/require.js
file akin to the dev archetype because
<archetype>/node_modules
is already at the top of the require search path.
However, some projects may wish to have an archetype control and provide
application dependencies and dev dependencies, which we discuss in the
next section
The module pattern works great for any require()
-based CommonJS code.
Unfortunately, when using babel and ES.next imports like:
import _ from "lodash";
The module pattern is not available because the actual require("lodash")
statement spit out during transpilation is not directly accessible to the
developer.
Fortunately (and unsurprisingly) we have a babel plugin to enable the module
pattern in ES.next code: [babel-plugin-replace-require
][babel-plugin-replace-require].
The plugin can easily be configured with tokens to insert dev archetypes in
require
s produced by babel transpilation. For example, say we wanted to get
lodash
from above from our dev archetype, we would configure a .babelrc
like:
{
"plugins": [
["replace-require", {
"DEV_ARCHETYPE": "require('<archetype-dev>/require')"
}]
]
}
Then prepend our custom token to the source ES.next code:
import _ from "DEV_ARCHETYPE/lodash";
When transpiled, the output would become:
"use strict";
var _lodash = require('<archetype-dev>/require')("lodash");
var _lodash2 = _interopRequireDefault(_lodash);
function _interopRequireDefault(obj) { return obj && obj.__esModule ? obj : { default: obj }; }
giving us the correct module pattern.
An analogous situation occurs for frontend JS code in the production archetype, but with a different solution. The underlying issue is that Webpack cannot ingest:
// src/foo.js
var mod = require("<archetype-dev>/require")("lib-name");
like Node.js can, so we need a little help in the form of a loader.
Note: Previous incarnations of this documentation suggested mutating
Webpack code (resolve.root
) and loader (resolveLoader.root
) configurations.
We no longer suggest this as the loader pattern in this section is much more
precise and doesn't lead to potential prod-vs-dev ambiguities in module use.
Turning to the above example, we can use the
[webpack-alternate-require-loader
][webpack-alternate-require-loader] to
rewrite CommonJS forms of the module pattern into fully-resolved paths on disk
that work for webpack.
Let's start with our webpack configuration:
// webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
module: {
loaders: [
{
test: /\.js$/,
loader: "webpack-alternate-require-loader",
query: JSON.stringify({
"<archetype-dev>/require": require.resolve("<archetype-dev>/require")
})
}
]
}
};
With this configuration, Webpack will parse our above code sample and actually
perform the resolution of lib-name
using the require
provided in
<archetype-dev>/require
producing ultimate code like:
// lib/foo.js
var mod = require("/RESOLVED/PATH/TO/lib-name");
This essentially converts a runtime lookup of the require
starting from
the dev archetype to a build time lookup performed by webpack.
Conveniently, this plugin also works with code produced by
babel-plugin-replace-require
when configured as specified in the previous
section.
Shared Node / Frontend Code: The best part of this plugin is that if you have shared code between Node.js and the frontend, you can have the exact same code work in both places -- unparsed for Node.js and processed via Webpack for the frontend.
Out of the box builder
does not manage application dependencies, instead
managing dependencies only for builder workflows and tasks, e.g. things
starting with the builder
command.
Most notably, this means that if your application code includes a dependency
like lodash
:
// <root>/src/index.js
var _ = require("lodash");
module.exports = _.camelCase("Hi There");
and the root project is consumed by anything besides a builder
command,
then it must have a dependency like:
// <root>/package.json
"dependencies": {
"lodash": "^4.2.1"
}
However, if you want to use builder to also manage application dependencies,
then you can follow the module pattern and provide an
<archetype>/require.js
file consisting of:
// Contents of <archetype>/require.js
module.exports = require;
The root project could then require code like:
var modFromProd = require("<archetype>/require")("lib-name"); // Module
var pathFromProd = require("<archetype>/require").resolve("lib-name"); // Module path
var modFromDev = require("<archetype-dev>/require")("lib-name"); // Module
var pathFromDev = require("<archetype-dev>/require").resolve("lib-name"); // Module path
Using the above pattern, <archetype>
or <archetype-dev>
dependencies would
override <root>/node_modules
dependencies reliably and irrespective of npm
flattening.
So, turning back to our original example, we could utilize archetype dependencies by refactoring to something like:
// <root>/src/index.js
var _ = require("<archetype>/require")("lodash");
module.exports = _.camelCase("Hi There");
and dev code like:
// <root>/test/index.js
var _ = require("<archetype-dev>/require")("lodash");
module.exports = _.camelCase("Hi There");
after which you would not need a lodash
dependency in root/package.json
.
Once everything is configured and npm link
'd, it should be easy to move
scripts to your archetype and quickly test them out from a consuming project.
- copy
dependencies
topackage.json
dependencies
. - copy
devDependencies
todev/package.json
dependencies
.
Note that you should only copy dependencies
from <root>/package.json
to
<archetype>/package.json
that are needed within the archetype itself for:
- Execution of a script. (E.g., the
istanbul
script). - Required by a configuration file in the archetype. (E.g.,
webpack
if a webpack configuration callsrequire("webpack")
).
You can then remove any dependencies only used by the scripts
tasks that
you have moved to the archetype. However, take care to
not remove real application dependencies
unless you are using a module pattern to provide
application dependencies.
All scripts defined in archetypes will be run from the root of the project consuming the archetype. This means you have to change all paths in your scripts to reference their new location within the archetype.
An example script and config you may be moving to an archetype would look like:
"test-server-unit": "mocha --opts test/server/mocha.opts test/server/spec"
When moving this script to an archetype, we'd also move the config from
test/server/mocha.opts
within the original project to within the
archetype such as config/mocha/server/mocha.opts
.
For this example script, we'd need to update the path to mocha.opts
as so:
"test-server-unit": "mocha --opts node_modules/new-archetype-name/config/mocha/server/mocha.opts test/server/spec"
Any paths that reference files expected in the consuming app (in this example
test/server/spec
) do not need to change.
Any JavaScript files run from within an archetype (such as config files) require
a few changes related to paths now that the files are being run from within
an npm module. This includes all require()
calls referencing npm modules and
all paths to files that aren't relative.
For example, karma.conf.js
:
module.exports = function (config) {
require("./karma.conf.dev")(config);
config.set({
preprocessors: {
"test/client/main.js": ["webpack"]
},
files: [
"sinon/pkg/sinon",
"test/client/main.js"
],
});
};
All non-relative paths to files and npm modules need to be full paths, even ones
not in the archetype directory. For files expected to be in the consuming
project, this can be achieved by prepending process.cwd()
to all paths. For
npm modules, full paths can be achieved by using
require.resolve()
.
An updated config might look like:
var path = require("path");
var ROOT = process.cwd();
var MAIN_PATH = path.join(ROOT, "test/client/main.js");
module.exports = function (config) {
require("./karma.conf.dev")(config);
config.set({
preprocessors: {
[MAIN_PATH]: ["webpack"]
},
files: [
require.resolve("sinon/pkg/sinon"), // Normal archetype
require("<archetype-dev>/require").resolve("sinon/pkg/sinon"), // Dev archetype
MAIN_PATH
],
});
};
.
├── CONTRIBUTING.md
├── HISTORY.md
├── LICENSE.txt
├── README.md
├── config
│ ├── eslint
│ ├── karma
│ ├── mocha
│ │ ├── func
│ │ │ ├── mocha.dev.opts
│ │ │ └── mocha.opts
│ │ └── server
│ │ └── mocha.opts
│ └── webpack
│ ├── webpack.config.coverage.js
│ ├── webpack.config.dev.js
│ ├── webpack.config.hot.js
│ ├── webpack.config.js
│ └── webpack.config.test.js
├── dev
│ └── package.json
│ └── require.js
└── package.json
Builder uses some magic to enhance PATH
and NODE_PATH
to look in the
installed modules of builder archetypes and in the root of your project (per
normal). We mutate both of these environment variables to resolve in the
following order:
PATH
:
<cwd>/node_modules/<archetype>/.bin
<cwd>/node_modules/<archetype-dev>/.bin
<cwd>/node_modules/.bin
- Existing
PATH
require
+ NODE_PATH
: For file.js
with a require
/PATH/TO/file.js
(all sub directories +node_modules
going down the tree)<cwd>/node_modules/<archetype>/node_modules
<cwd>/node_modules/<archetype-dev>/node_modules
<cwd>/node_modules
- Existing
NODE_PATH
The order of resolution doesn't often come up, but can sometimes be a factor
in diagnosing archetype issues and script / file paths, especially when using
npm
v3.
Builder clones the entire environment object before mutating it for further
execution of tasks. On Mac/Linux, this has no real change of behavior of how
the execution environment works. However, on Windows, there are some subtle
issues with the fact that Windows has a case-insensitive environment variable
model wherein you can set PATH
in a node process, but internally this is
transformed to set Path
. Builder specifically handles PATH
correctly across
platforms for it's own specific mutation.
However, if your tasks rely on the Windows coercion of case-insensitivity of environment variables, you may run into some idiosyncratic problems with tasks.
In some cases, npm link
can interfere with the order of resolution. If you
run into resolution problems, you can develop locally with the
following in your consuming project's package.json
as an alternative to npm link
:
{
"dependencies": {
"YOUR_ARCHETYPE_NAME": "file:../YOUR_ARCHETYPE_REPO"
},
"devDependencies": {
"YOUR_ARCHETYPE_NAME_dev": "file:../YOUR_ARCHETYPE_REPO/dev"
}
}
The enhancements to NODE_PATH
that builder
performs can throw tools /
libraries for a loop. Generally speaking, we recommend using
require.resolve("LIBRARY_OR_REQUIRE_PATH")
to get the appropriate installed
file path to a dependency.
This comes up in situations including:
- Webpack loaders
- Karma included files
The other thing that comes up in our Archetype configuration file is the
general requirement that builder is running from the project root, not
relative to an archetype. However, some libraries / tools will interpret
"./"
as relative to the configuration file which may be in an archetype.
So, for these instances and instances where you typically use __dirname
,
an archetype may need to use process.cwd()
and be constrained to only
ever running from the project root. Some scenarios where the process.cwd()
path base is necessary include:
- Webpack entry points, aliases
- Karma included files (that cannot be
require.resolve
-ed)
We recommend not using any of the special npm
scripts
commands listed in
https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scripts such as:
- prepublish, postinstall
- test
- stop, start
in your archetype scripts
. This is due to the fact that the archetype
package.json
files are themselves consumed by npm
for publishing (which
can lead to tasks executing for the archetype instead of the project using
the archetype) and potentially lead to awkward recursive composed task
scenarios.
Instead, we recommend adding an npm:<task>
prefix to your tasks to identify
them as usable in root projects for real npm
lifecycle tasks.
We plan on issuing warnings for archetypes that do implement lifecycle tasks in: #81
The execution of tasks generally must originate from Builder, because of all
of the environment enhancements it adds. So, for things that themselves exec
or spawn processes, like concurrently
, this can be a problem. Typically, you
will need to have the actual command line processes invoked by Builder.
Builder is designed to be as close to vanilla npm as possible. So, if for
example you were using the builder-react-component
archetype with a project
package.json
like:
"scripts": {
"postinstall": "builder run npm:postinstall",
"preversion": "builder run npm:preversion",
"version": "builder run npm:version",
"test": "builder run npm:test",
/* other deps */
},
"dependencies": {
"builder": "v2.0.0",
"builder-react-component": "v0.0.5",
/* other deps */
},
"devDependencies": {
"builder-react-component-dev": "v0.0.5",
/* other deps */
}
and decided to no longer use Builder, here is a rough set of steps to unpack the archetype into your project and remove all Builder dependencies:
- Copy all
ARCHETYPE/package.json:dependencies
to yourPROJECT/package.json:dependencies
(e.g., frombuilder-react-component
). You do not need to copy overARCHETYPE/package.json:devDependencies
. - Copy all
ARCHETYPE/package.json:scripts
to yourPROJECT/package.json:scripts
that do not begin with thebuilder:
prefix. Remove thenpm:
prefix from anyscripts
tasks and note that you may have to manually resolve tasks of the same name within the archetype and also with your project. - Copy all
ARCHETYPE/package.json:config
variables to yourPROJECT/package.json:config
. - Copy all
ARCHETYPE-dev/package.json:dependencies
to yourPROJECT/package.json:devDependencies
(e.g., frombuilder-react-component-dev
) - Copy all configuration files used in your
ARCHETYPE
into the root project. For example, forbuilder-react-component
you would need to copy thebuilder-react-component/config
directory toPROJECT/config
(or a renamed directory). - Replace all instances of
require("<archetype-dev>/require")
andrequire("<archetype>/require")
withrequire
in configuration / other Node.js files from the archetype. - Review all of the combined
scripts
tasks and:- resolve duplicate task names
- revise configuration file paths for the moved files
- replace instances of
builder run <task>
withnpm run <task>
- for
builder concurrent <task1> <task2>
tasks, first install theconcurrently
package and then rewrite to:concurrent 'npm run <task1>' 'npm run <task2>'
... and (with assuredly a few minor hiccups) that's about it! You are
Builder-free and back to a normal npm
-controlled project.
Archived: This project is no longer maintained by Formidable. We are no longer responding to issues or pull requests unless they relate to security concerns. We encourage interested developers to fork this project and make it their own!