Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ntsync5: Implement ntsync7 support and revert ntsync5 to v6 version #1345

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

Artewar67
Copy link
Contributor

@Artewar67 Artewar67 commented Dec 21, 2024

So far at the moment ntsync5 v7 is only available in linux-cachyos and maybe in others, but ntsync5-dkms from AUR and linux-zen still use the v6 version. So I added ntsync7 patches and a new parameter for _use_ntsync5. ntsync5 patches are back to v6

Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
Also add missing patch for ntsync5-staging from ntsync5-staging-protonify

Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Artemev <artewar6767@gmail.com>
@Tk-Glitch
Copy link
Member

I guess it's fine for now considering the current situation. Ntsync upstreaming needs to happen.
Thank you Artewar67! 🐸 ❤️

@Tk-Glitch Tk-Glitch merged commit 41f7e24 into Frogging-Family:master Dec 21, 2024
Artewar67 added a commit to Artewar67/wine-tkg-git-ntsync5 that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
…ersion (Frogging-Family#1345)"

Now ntsync5 v7 avalable in ntsync-dkms from AUR

This reverts commit 41f7e24.
Tk-Glitch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
…ersion (#1345)" (#1346)

Now ntsync5 v7 avalable in ntsync-dkms from AUR

This reverts commit 41f7e24.
@sfjuocekr
Copy link

This does not apply cleanly to mainline v9.22

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants