-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add arrayCopy, arraySet, arrayRangeEqual array primitives. #1268
Conversation
…angeLookup and arrayRangeUpdate.
lib/Array.cry
Outdated
arrayRangeUpdate : {a, b, n} (Integral a, fin n, n >= 1, Literal (n - 1) a) => (Array a b) -> a -> [n]b -> (Array a b) | ||
arrayRangeUpdate arr idx vals = arrs ! 0 | ||
where | ||
arrs = [arr] # [ arrayUpdate acc (idx + i) val | acc <- arrs | i <- [0 .. (n - 1)] | val <- vals ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a small thing, but I think you could avoid the n >= 1
constraint if you used the i <- [ 0 ..< n ]
enumeration form instead.
I think the n >= 1
constraint is also unnecessary for arrayRangeLookup
.
lib/Array.cry
Outdated
* Copy elements from the source array to the destination array. | ||
* | ||
* 'arrayCopy dest_arr dest_idx src_arr src_idx len' copies the | ||
* elements from 'src_arr' at indices '[src_idx .. (src_idx + len)]' into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry to nitpick some more, but I think essentially all these ranges are intended to be half-open and we should probably use the Cryptol-style notation for that, which would make this [src_idx ..< (src_idx + len)]
, and similar below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's fix up the failing regression test case and address the comment nitpicks. Then I think this is good to go.
Add arrayRangeLookup and arrayRangeUpdate helpers.