Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create naive phenotype search #6

Open
jsstevenson opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Create naive phenotype search #6

jsstevenson opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
requirement Required

Comments

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member

jsstevenson commented Sep 5, 2024

  • Given phenotype, retrieve every matching participant_id

Practically speaking, this already exists, but maybe we can define a more generalizeable output that would support similarity searches.

@jsstevenson jsstevenson added the requirement Required label Sep 9, 2024
@ahwagner
Copy link
Member

Practically speaking, this already exists

This is good to know–please to link to what exists today for reference and I'll take a look.

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member Author

jsstevenson commented Sep 11, 2024

please to link to what exists today

@ahwagner this is referring to the patient-phenotype mapping table that we discussed yesterday. Obviously there's no literal search layer on top of it but it would be pretty trivial to do so (just depends on our final strategy for platform/library/deployment) -- it's essentially already a flat file.

More interesting stretch goals, if we have time at the end, could involve defining patient similarity with reference to ontology embeddings.

@ahwagner
Copy link
Member

this is referring to the patient-phenotype mapping table that we discussed yesterday

Okay, that makes sense. For my own reference, these are the tables where the phenotype->patient mappings exist.

@jsstevenson
Copy link
Member Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
requirement Required
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants