Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed Mark All as Unused Query statement #3444

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

manas-droid
Copy link
Contributor

@manas-droid manas-droid commented Jan 12, 2024

Defect Id : 37220

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected the logic for marking items as unused in the database.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated to modify how SQL queries are constructed and to change the logic within a method responsible for marking data usage. Specifically, an opening brace has been added to the query builder process, and the default state for the GINGER_USED field has been switched from "True" to "False".

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../LiteDBSQLTranslator.cs - Added opening brace to queryBuilder
- ValueExpressionForMarkAllUnused sets GINGER_USED to "False"

🐇✨📜✨🐇
To the code, we hop and tweak,
Adding braces, changing speak.
"False" not "True," we now assert,
In SQL's realm, rabbits flirt. 🥕🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1c1444 and a44dbbb.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDBSQLTranslator.cs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDBSQLTranslator.cs (3)
  • 30-30: The addition of the { character to queryBuilder after its initialization seems to be intentional and part of the query syntax. However, it's important to ensure that this change is consistent with the expected query format and does not introduce any syntax errors.

  • 179-179: The change in the ValueExpressionForMarkAllUnused method correctly sets the GINGER_USED field to "False", aligning with the PR objectives to mark items as unused. This change should resolve the defect mentioned in the PR description.

  • 27-33: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-179]

Overall, the changes in the file appear to be localized to the ValueExpressionForMarkAllUnused method and the initialization of queryBuilder. It is important to ensure that these changes are tested thoroughly, especially since they involve altering SQL query strings which could have a significant impact on the application's data handling.

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 merged commit f6e8992 into Releases/Beta Jan 15, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 deleted the Defect/DataSourceCountError branch January 15, 2024 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants