Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

- fixing Appiun Swipe issue #3466

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

- fixing Appiun Swipe issue #3466

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

MeniKadosh1
Copy link
Contributor

@MeniKadosh1 MeniKadosh1 commented Jan 28, 2024

-Upgrading Appium Nugget to more updated version

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced swipe functionality across both Android and iOS platforms for a more consistent user experience.
  • Refactor
    • Simplified touch action building process for improved performance and reliability.
  • Chores
    • Updated the Appium.WebDriver package to version "5.0.0-rc.1" for better stability and new features.

-Upgrading Appium Nugget to more updated version
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent modifications streamline the mobile automation framework within the GingerCoreNET library. Specifically, the update enhances the SwipeScreen method by refining its direction calculations and removing unnecessary parameters, making gestures more intuitive across both Android and iOS. Additionally, the update to the Appium.WebDriver dependency marks a transition from a beta to a release candidate version, indicating a move towards more stable and reliable automation interactions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../Mobile/Appium/GenericAppiumDriver.cs Refined SwipeScreen method and simplified BuildTouchAction for all platforms.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj Updated Appium.WebDriver package from "5.0.0-beta01" to "5.0.0-rc.1".

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where the rabbits hop,
We've made swipes smoother, without a stop.
From beta to candidate, we advance with cheer,
A leap towards stability, the goal is near.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between abcda76 and ad41f5c.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Mobile/Appium/GenericAppiumDriver.cs (4 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (1)
  • 227-227: The update of the Appium.WebDriver package from "5.0.0-beta01" to "5.0.0-rc.1" is correctly implemented. This change is essential for addressing the swipe functionality issues mentioned in the PR objectives. Ensure that this version update is tested across all relevant platforms and scenarios to confirm compatibility and functionality.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Mobile/Appium/GenericAppiumDriver.cs (1)
  • 1465-1472: The BuildTouchAction method has been adjusted to include default spacing around the = operator for the waitDuration parameter, aligning with coding standards for readability.

This change improves code readability and consistency.

Comment on lines +912 to +916
SwipeScreen(eSwipeSide.Down, 1);
break;

case ActMobileDevice.eMobileDeviceAction.SwipeUp:
SwipeScreen(eSwipeSide.Up, 0.25);
SwipeScreen(eSwipeSide.Up, 1);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The impact parameter in the SwipeScreen method is not utilized in the method body, leading to potential confusion about its purpose.

Consider removing the impact parameter if it's not needed, or implement its usage within the method.

Comment on lines +1447 to +1455
startX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.1;
endX = sz.Width * 0.3;
endY = sz.Height * 0.5;
break;
case eSwipeSide.Left: // center of right side
startX = sz.Width * 0.1;
startX = sz.Width * 0.3;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.8 * impact;
endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic for calculating start and end points in the SwipeScreen method for eSwipeSide.Right and eSwipeSide.Left seems inverted. For swiping right, one would expect the start X to be less than the end X, and vice versa for swiping left.

- startX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact; // For Right swipe, this should be smaller, like 0.3
- endX = sz.Width * 0.3; // For Right swipe, this should be larger, like 0.7 * impact
+ startX = sz.Width * 0.3; // Corrected for Right swipe
+ endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact; // Corrected for Right swipe
// Similar corrections needed for Left swipe

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
startX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.1;
endX = sz.Width * 0.3;
endY = sz.Height * 0.5;
break;
case eSwipeSide.Left: // center of right side
startX = sz.Width * 0.1;
startX = sz.Width * 0.3;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.8 * impact;
endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
startX = sz.Width * 0.3; // Corrected for Right swipe
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact; // Corrected for Right swipe
endY = sz.Height * 0.5;
break;
case eSwipeSide.Left: // center of right side
startX = sz.Width * 0.3;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;

Comment on lines 1444 to 1458
endY = sz.Height * 0.3;
break;
case eSwipeSide.Right: // center of left side
startX = sz.Width * 0.8 * impact;
startX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.1;
endX = sz.Width * 0.3;
endY = sz.Height * 0.5;
break;
case eSwipeSide.Left: // center of right side
startX = sz.Width * 0.1;
startX = sz.Width * 0.3;
startY = sz.Height * 0.5;
endX = sz.Width * 0.8 * impact;
endX = sz.Width * 0.7 * impact;
endY = sz.Height * 0.5;
break;
default:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [912-1472]

No explicit performance issues detected in the modified methods. However, it's important to ensure that the SwipeScreen and BuildTouchAction methods are not called excessively in tight loops without necessary throttling, as they involve UI interactions that can be resource-intensive.

Consider adding performance notes or throttling mechanisms if these methods are used in performance-critical sections.

@MeniKadosh1 MeniKadosh1 merged commit c77c904 into master Jan 29, 2024
1 of 4 checks passed
@MeniKadosh1 MeniKadosh1 deleted the Appium-changes branch January 29, 2024 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants