Ginger Runset Execution Report DB Link to ALM #3739
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve updating project references from package references to direct DLL references for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MainWindow
participant ImageMakerControl
User->>MainWindow: Open Application
MainWindow->>ImageMakerControl: Adjust Margins
MainWindow-->>User: Display Updated UI
participant DynamicExecutionManager
participant ALM
User->>DynamicExecutionManager: Request Report Link
DynamicExecutionManager->>ALM: Generate Report Link
ALM-->>DynamicExecutionManager: Return Report Link
DynamicExecutionManager-->>User: Provide Report Link
Poem
Warning Review ran into problemsProblems (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs (1)
56-57: Consider removing unused imports if they are not needed elsewhere in the file.Unused imports can clutter the code and potentially lead to confusion about dependencies.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DLLS/Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dllis excluded by!**/*.dll
Files selected for processing (14)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml (4 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml.cs (6 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCore/ALM/RQM/ExportToRQM.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj (2 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ALM/PublishToALMConfig.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs (35 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs (5 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Octane/OctaneCore.cs (7 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GeneralLib/General.cs (7 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (2 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQCOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/DynamicExecutionLib/DynamicExecutionManager.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNETUnitTest/GingerCoreNETUnitTest.csproj (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Build Stage / build
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs
[failure] 384-384:
'JiraRepositoryStd' does not contain a definition for 'AddComment' and no accessible extension method 'AddComment' accepting a first argument of type 'JiraRepositoryStd' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Octane/OctaneCore.cs
[failure] 711-711:
'OctaneRepository' does not contain a definition for 'AddComment' and no accessible extension method 'AddComment' accepting a first argument of type 'OctaneRepository' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Additional comments not posted (13)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ALM/PublishToALMConfig.cs (1)
75-90: The implementation of theToExportReportLinkproperty with change notification is correctly done.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs (1)
48-64: The implementation of thetoExportReportLinkproperty with change notification and serialization is correctly done.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQCOperations.cs (1)
67-67: The propagation of theToExportReportLinksetting inSetExportToALMConfigmethod is correctly implemented.Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml.cs (1)
69-69: The data-binding of thetoExportReportLinkproperty to the checkbox is correctly implemented, allowing user interaction to directly affect the configuration.Ginger/GingerCoreNETUnitTest/GingerCoreNETUnitTest.csproj (1)
118-120: Clarify the reason for replacing the NuGet package with a direct DLL reference.Ensure that this change does not affect the build process or introduce issues with dependency management. It might be beneficial to consider if maintaining the package via NuGet could offer better manageability unless there are specific reasons for this approach.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs (2)
251-277: Handle potential exceptions more gracefully.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]
When adding attachments, the exception is only logged. It might be beneficial to also handle the exception in a way that does not stop the execution of the loop, such as continuing with the next iteration or handling specific types of exceptions differently.- catch (Exception ex) - { - Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Error adding attachment '{attachmentPath.Trim()}': {ex.Message}"); - } + catch (IOException ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"IO Error adding attachment '{attachmentPath.Trim()}': {ex.Message}"); + continue; // Skip this iteration and proceed with the next attachment + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Unexpected error adding attachment '{attachmentPath.Trim()}': {ex.Message}"); + throw; // Re-throw unexpected exceptions to be handled higher up + }
367-374: Ensure consistency in data handling.The method
ExportExecutionDetailsToALMuses a configuration objectpublishToALMConfigto conditionally add a report link. Verify that this configuration is consistently applied across all relevant methods and that the configuration object is validated before use.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs (2)
29-29: Added new using directives forGingerCoreNET.ALMLibandSystem.Net.Http.These imports are necessary for the new functionalities introduced in this file, such as ALM integration and HTTP communication.
40-40: Added using directive forSystem.Net.Http.This import is essential for handling HTTP requests within the class, which is likely used for interactions with the JIRA API.
Ginger/GingerCore/ALM/RQM/ExportToRQM.cs (1)
537-544: Ensure proper handling ofHtmlReportUrlwhenToExportReportLinkis true.The added condition checks if
ToExportReportLinkis true and appropriately sets theHtmlReportUrland related properties. This is a crucial feature for linking execution results with their respective reports in ALM systems. Ensure thatHtmlReportUrlandExecutionIdare always valid URLs and identifiers when used.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Octane/OctaneCore.cs (2)
31-33: Added necessary using directives forGingerCoreNET.GeneralLibandMicrosoft.Graph.
245-248: 1. The methodConnectALMServerincludes a new block for handling certificate data which enhances security by allowing certificate-based authentication. Ensure that the certificate path and password are securely managed and not logged.
2. The methodExportExecutionDetailsToALMnow includes functionality to export a report link. Ensure that theHtmlReportUrlis validated to prevent injection attacks.Also applies to: 565-577
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/DynamicExecutionLib/DynamicExecutionManager.cs (1)
871-871: Ensure proper handling of theExportReportLinkproperty.Verification successful
The
ExportReportLinkproperty appears to be properly handled in various parts of the codebase. Here are the key locations where it is used:
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/DynamicExecutionLib/DynamicExecutionManager.cs: The property is being set.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQCOperations.cs: The property is being set.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Octane/OctaneCore.cs: The property is being checked.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs: The property is being checked.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs: The property is being checked.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs: The property is defined and used.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ALM/PublishToALMConfig.cs: The property is defined and used.Ginger/GingerCore/ALM/RQM/ExportToRQM.cs: The property is being checked.Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml.cs: The property is being bound to UI elements.Based on the search results, the
ExportReportLinkproperty is consistently used and appears to be properly handled across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `ExportReportLink` property is properly handled throughout the system. # Test: Search for the property usage. Expect: Proper handling in all occurrences. rg --type cs $'ExportReportLink'Length of output: 2637
| <Reference Include="Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts"> | ||
| <HintPath>..\GingerCoreNET\DLLS\Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dll</HintPath> | ||
| </Reference> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider potential risks associated with direct DLL references.
Switching from a NuGet package reference to a direct DLL reference (Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts) might lead to challenges in managing dependencies, especially in terms of version control and build reproducibility. It's crucial to ensure that the DLL is properly version controlled and that any updates to it are managed systematically. Can you please clarify the rationale behind this change?
| public static string CreateReportLinkPerFlow(string HtmlReportUrl, string ExecutionId, string BusinessFlowInstanceGuid) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(HtmlReportUrl) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(ExecutionId) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(BusinessFlowInstanceGuid)) | ||
| { | ||
| if (HtmlReportUrl.Last() != '/') | ||
| { | ||
| HtmlReportUrl = $"{HtmlReportUrl}/"; | ||
| } | ||
| return $"{HtmlReportUrl}#/BusinessFlow/{ExecutionId}/{BusinessFlowInstanceGuid}"; | ||
| } | ||
| return ""; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation of CreateReportLinkPerFlow is correct and follows good practices in checking for null or empty values. However, consider using UriBuilder or similar to construct URLs to handle edge cases and improve readability.
- if (HtmlReportUrl.Last() != '/')
- {
- HtmlReportUrl = $"{HtmlReportUrl}/";
- }
- return $"{HtmlReportUrl}#/BusinessFlow/{ExecutionId}/{BusinessFlowInstanceGuid}";
+ UriBuilder uriBuilder = new UriBuilder(HtmlReportUrl);
+ uriBuilder.Path += $"#/BusinessFlow/{ExecutionId}/{BusinessFlowInstanceGuid}";
+ return uriBuilder.ToString();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| public static string CreateReportLinkPerFlow(string HtmlReportUrl, string ExecutionId, string BusinessFlowInstanceGuid) | |
| { | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(HtmlReportUrl) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(ExecutionId) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(BusinessFlowInstanceGuid)) | |
| { | |
| if (HtmlReportUrl.Last() != '/') | |
| { | |
| HtmlReportUrl = $"{HtmlReportUrl}/"; | |
| } | |
| return $"{HtmlReportUrl}#/BusinessFlow/{ExecutionId}/{BusinessFlowInstanceGuid}"; | |
| } | |
| return ""; | |
| } | |
| public static string CreateReportLinkPerFlow(string HtmlReportUrl, string ExecutionId, string BusinessFlowInstanceGuid) | |
| { | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(HtmlReportUrl) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(ExecutionId) && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(BusinessFlowInstanceGuid)) | |
| { | |
| UriBuilder uriBuilder = new UriBuilder(HtmlReportUrl); | |
| uriBuilder.Path += $"#/BusinessFlow/{ExecutionId}/{BusinessFlowInstanceGuid}"; | |
| return uriBuilder.ToString(); | |
| } | |
| return ""; | |
| } |
| <Reference Include="Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts"> | ||
| <HintPath>DLLS\Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dll</HintPath> | ||
| </Reference> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The DLL path specified for Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dll is incorrect. Please update the HintPath in the project file to point to the correct location of the DLL.
- File:
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj - Lines: 349-351
Analysis chain
Ensure the new reference path to Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dll is correct.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new DLL reference path.
# Test: Check if the DLL exists at the specified path. Expect: File exists.
if [ -f "DLLS/Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dll" ]; then
echo "DLL path is correct."
else
echo "DLL path is incorrect. Please update the HintPath."
fi
Length of output: 165
| private bool AddCommentForTestRun(string TestRunId, string comment) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| return this.octaneRepository.AddComment(GetLoginDTO(), new Run() { Id = new EntityId(TestRunId) }, comment); | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| catch | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method AddCommentForTestRun is intended to add comments to a test run, but there's a build error due to the missing AddComment method in OctaneRepository.
- return this.octaneRepository.AddComment(GetLoginDTO(), new Run() { Id = new EntityId(TestRunId) }, comment);
+ // Correct method needs to be called here, ensure `OctaneRepository` has the appropriate method or use an alternative approach.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
GitHub Check: Build Stage / build
[failure] 711-711:
'OctaneRepository' does not contain a definition for 'AddComment' and no accessible extension method 'AddComment' accepting a first argument of type 'OctaneRepository' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
| @@ -319,7 +321,7 @@ private static string CheckIfDefectExist(string summaryValue) | |||
| } | |||
| catch (Exception ex) | |||
| { | |||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR,"Unable to get data from the Azure", ex); | |||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to get data from the Azure", ex); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and user feedback.
The method CheckIfDefectExist logs an error but does not provide feedback to the user or calling function that an error occurred. Consider modifying the method to return a more informative result or exception that can be handled appropriately.
| defectsOpeningResults.Add(defectForOpening.Key, CreateDefectData(defectForOpening).Id.ToString()); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure exception handling for potential failures in external calls.
The method CreateDefectData is called without handling potential exceptions that might be thrown due to external API calls. Consider adding try-catch blocks around these calls to handle possible exceptions and maintain application stability.
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to update the test case", ex); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve exception handling in UpdateTestCase.
The method UpdateTestCase catches a general exception but does not log the specific error message. This can make debugging more difficult. Consider logging the specific error message or rethrowing the exception with additional context.
- catch (Exception ex)
- {
- Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to update the test case", ex);
- }
+ catch (Exception ex)
+ {
+ Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Unable to update the test case: {ex.Message}", ex);
+ throw new ApplicationException("Error updating test case", ex); // Provide context when rethrowing
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| catch (Exception ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to update the test case", ex); | |
| catch (Exception ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Unable to update the test case: {ex.Message}", ex); | |
| throw new ApplicationException("Error updating test case", ex); // Provide context when rethrowing |
| public Dictionary<string, string> AzureProjectList() | ||
| { | ||
| dynamic list = AzureDevOpsRepository.GetLoginProjects(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL,ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword); | ||
| dynamic list = AzureDevOpsRepository.GetLoginProjects(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL, ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword); | ||
| Dictionary<string, string> listOfItems = new(); | ||
| if (list.DataResult is null) | ||
| { | ||
| return listOfItems; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| foreach(var item in list.DataResult) | ||
| foreach (var item in list.DataResult) | ||
| { | ||
| foreach (var i in item.Projects) | ||
| { | ||
| listOfItems.Add(i.Guid,i.ProjectName); | ||
| listOfItems.Add(i.Guid, i.ProjectName); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize dictionary initialization and population.
You can simplify the dictionary initialization and population using LINQ, which can improve readability and reduce the number of lines.
- Dictionary<string, string> listOfItems = new();
- if (list.DataResult is null)
- {
- return listOfItems;
- }
- foreach (var item in list.DataResult)
- {
- foreach (var i in item.Projects)
- {
- listOfItems.Add(i.Guid, i.ProjectName);
- }
- }
+ var listOfItems = list.DataResult?.SelectMany(item => item.Projects)
+ .ToDictionary(i => i.Guid, i => i.ProjectName) ?? new Dictionary<string, string>();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| public Dictionary<string, string> AzureProjectList() | |
| { | |
| dynamic list = AzureDevOpsRepository.GetLoginProjects(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL,ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword); | |
| dynamic list = AzureDevOpsRepository.GetLoginProjects(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL, ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword); | |
| Dictionary<string, string> listOfItems = new(); | |
| if (list.DataResult is null) | |
| { | |
| return listOfItems; | |
| } | |
| foreach(var item in list.DataResult) | |
| foreach (var item in list.DataResult) | |
| { | |
| foreach (var i in item.Projects) | |
| { | |
| listOfItems.Add(i.Guid,i.ProjectName); | |
| listOfItems.Add(i.Guid, i.ProjectName); | |
| } | |
| public Dictionary<string, string> AzureProjectList() | |
| { | |
| dynamic list = AzureDevOpsRepository.GetLoginProjects(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL, ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword); | |
| var listOfItems = list.DataResult?.SelectMany(item => item.Projects) | |
| .ToDictionary(i => i.Guid, i => i.ProjectName) ?? new Dictionary<string, string>(); |
| @@ -71,19 +73,19 @@ | |||
| Password = ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword, | |||
| Server = ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper encapsulation of class properties.
The property _gingerActivitiesGroupsRepo is publicly settable which can lead to unintended modifications from outside the class. Consider making the setter private or protected.
- public ObservableList<ActivitiesGroup> _gingerActivitiesGroupsRepo { get; set; }
+ public ObservableList<ActivitiesGroup> _gingerActivitiesGroupsRepo { get; private set; }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| public ObservableList<ActivitiesGroup> _gingerActivitiesGroupsRepo { get; private set; } |
| patchDocument = AddAttachmentsToDefect(patchDocument, defectForOpening, workItemTrackingClient); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The gathered information provides the complete implementations of the CreateNewALMDefects and CreateNewTestCase methods. Both methods use .Result to synchronously wait for asynchronous operations, which can indeed lead to potential deadlocks.
CreateNewALMDefects Method
- This method calls
CreateDefectData, which in turn callsCreateWorkItemAsyncwith.Result.
CreateNewTestCase Method
- This method directly calls
CreateWorkItemAsyncwith.Result.
To refactor these methods to use await, we need to:
- Make the
CreateNewALMDefectsandCreateNewTestCasemethods asynchronous. - Use
awaitfor the asynchronous calls instead of.Result.
Here are the refactored versions of these methods:
public override async Task<Dictionary<Guid, string>> CreateNewALMDefectsAsync(Dictionary<Guid, Dictionary<string, string>> defectsForOpening, List<ExternalItemFieldBase> defectsFields, bool useREST = false)
{
try
{
Dictionary<Guid, string> defectsOpeningResults = new Dictionary<Guid, string>();
List<string> screenshots = new();
foreach (KeyValuePair<Guid, Dictionary<string, string>> defectForOpening in defectsForOpening)
{
string summaryValue = defectForOpening.Value.ContainsKey("Summary") ? defectForOpening.Value["Summary"] : string.Empty;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(summaryValue))
{
string defectId = CheckIfDefectExist(summaryValue);
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(defectId))
{
defectsOpeningResults.Add(defectForOpening.Key, defectId);
continue;
}
else
{
string paths = defectForOpening.Value.ContainsKey("screenshots") ? defectForOpening.Value["screenshots"] : string.Empty;
screenshots.Add(paths);
}
}
defectsOpeningResults.Add(defectForOpening.Key, (await CreateDefectDataAsync(defectForOpening)).Id.ToString());
}
return defectsOpeningResults;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to Create New Defect", ex);
return null;
}
}
private static async Task<WorkItem> CreateDefectDataAsync(KeyValuePair<Guid, Dictionary<string, string>> defectForOpening)
{
try
{
LoginDTO login = GetLoginDTO();
VssConnection connection = AzureDevOpsRepository.LoginAzure(login);
WorkItemTrackingHttpClient workItemTrackingClient = connection.GetClient<WorkItemTrackingHttpClient>();
// Assuming AddAttachmentsToDefect is also async
JsonPatchDocument patchDocument = await AddAttachmentsToDefectAsync(new JsonPatchDocument(), defectForOpening, workItemTrackingClient);
return await workItemTrackingClient.CreateWorkItemAsync(patchDocument, login.Project, "Bug");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Unable to Create Defect Data", ex);
throw;
}
}
public async Task CreateNewTestCaseAsync(ActivitiesGroup ag, string fatherId, ObservableList<ExternalItemFieldBase> testcasefields, List<string> step)
{
TestBaseHelper helper = new TestBaseHelper();
ITestBase testBase = helper.Create();
testBase = CreateTestStep(step, testBase);
LoginDTO logincred = GetLoginDTO();
VssConnection connection = AzureDevOpsRepository.LoginAzure(logincred);
WorkItemTrackingHttpClient witclient = connection.GetClient<WorkItemTrackingHttpClient>();
JsonPatchDocument json = new JsonPatchDocument();
JsonPatchOperation patchDocument1 = new JsonPatchOperation
{
Operation = Operation.Add,
Path = "/fields/System.Title",
Value = ag.Name
};
json.Add(patchDocument1);
json = testBase.SaveActions(json);
var testCaseObject = await witclient.CreateWorkItemAsync(json, logincred.Project, "Test Case");
ag.ExternalID = testCaseObject.Id.ToString();
}Action Required
- Refactor the
CreateNewALMDefectsandCreateNewTestCasemethods to be asynchronous and useawaitinstead of.Result. - Ensure that any calling methods are also updated to handle the asynchronous nature of these methods.
Locations to Update
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
Category
Analysis chain
Verify correct handling of asynchronous operations.
The method CreateWorkItemAsync is called with .Result which can lead to deadlocks in certain contexts. Verify if it's possible to refactor this to use await and make the method asynchronous.
The search results indicate multiple instances of .Result being used in asynchronous method calls across various files in the codebase. This usage can indeed lead to potential deadlocks and other issues in certain contexts, especially in UI applications or when used in synchronous contexts.
To address the specific concern in AzureDevOpsCore.cs, we need to verify if the method CreateWorkItemAsync can be refactored to use await instead of .Result. This involves checking the method's context and ensuring that the calling method is asynchronous.
Let's gather more information about the CreateWorkItemAsync method and its usage within AzureDevOpsCore.cs.
The previous attempt to gather information about the CreateWorkItemAsync method and the context of its usage in AzureDevOpsCore.cs did not yield any results due to issues with reading certain files. To proceed, we need to refine our approach to ensure we can gather the necessary information.
Let's try a different strategy to locate the CreateWorkItemAsync method definition and its usage context.
The search results show that the CreateWorkItemAsync method is used in AzureDevOpsCore.cs with .Result, which can indeed lead to potential deadlocks. The methods where this occurs are:
CreateNewALMDefectsCreateNewTestCase
To verify if these methods can be refactored to use await instead of .Result, we need to check if these methods are asynchronous or if they can be made asynchronous.
Let's gather more information about the CreateNewALMDefects and CreateNewTestCase methods to see if they can be refactored to use await.
The gathered information shows the initial parts of the CreateNewALMDefects and CreateNewTestCase methods. However, we need to see the complete implementations to determine if they can be refactored to use await instead of .Result.
Let's extend our search to capture the full implementations of these methods.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all occurrences of '.Result' in async method calls to verify if they are handled properly.
rg --type cs '\.Result' --context 5
Length of output: 158659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the definition of the CreateWorkItemAsync method in the codebase
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'CreateWorkItemAsync($_, $_, $_)'
# Find all methods in AzureDevOpsCore.cs to understand the context of the method call
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class AzureDevOpsCore { $$$ }' Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
Length of output: 574
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the definition of CreateWorkItemAsync method in the codebase
rg 'CreateWorkItemAsync' --type cs
# Use ripgrep to search for all methods in AzureDevOpsCore.cs to understand the context of the method call
rg 'public ' Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
Length of output: 4299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of CreateNewALMDefects method in AzureDevOpsCore.cs
rg 'public override Dictionary<Guid, string> CreateNewALMDefects' -A 20 Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
# Search for the implementation of CreateNewTestCase method in AzureDevOpsCore.cs
rg 'public void CreateNewTestCase' -A 20 Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
Length of output: 2441
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the complete implementation of CreateNewALMDefects method in AzureDevOpsCore.cs
rg 'public override Dictionary<Guid, string> CreateNewALMDefects' -A 50 Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
# Search for the complete implementation of CreateNewTestCase method in AzureDevOpsCore.cs
rg 'public void CreateNewTestCase' -A 50 Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/Azure/AzureDevOpsCore.cs
Length of output: 4592
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml.cs (6 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs (5 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQCOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/DynamicExecutionLib/DynamicExecutionManager.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQC.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunSetActions/RunSetActionPublishToQCOperations.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/DynamicExecutionLib/DynamicExecutionManager.cs
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Build Stage / build
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs
[failure] 383-383:
Unexpected character ''
Additional comments not posted (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs (2)
29-30: Added necessary imports for ALM integration and general utilities.
41-41: Added import forSystem.Net.Http, likely used for HTTP operations within the class.
| @@ -341,7 +345,7 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| RunStatus jiraStatus = ConvertGingerStatusToJira(act.Status.HasValue ? act.Status.Value : eRunStatus.NA); | |||
| string comment = CreateCommentForRun(act.Acts.ToList()); | |||
| stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment, status = jiraStatus }); | |||
| stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment,status = jiraStatus }); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper spacing and alignment in the method call for consistency.
- stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment,status = jiraStatus });
+ stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment, status = jiraStatus });Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment,status = jiraStatus }); | |
| stepColl.Add(new JiraRunStepStautus() { comment = comment, status = jiraStatus }); |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(publishToALMConfig.HtmlReportUrl)) | ||
| { | ||
| string reportLink = General.CreateReportLinkPerFlow(HtmlReportUrl: publishToALMConfig.HtmlReportUrl, ExecutionId: publishToALMConfig.ExecutionId, BusinessFlowInstanceGuid: bizFlow.InstanceGuid.ToString()); | ||
| \ reportLink = $"[Ginger Report Link|{reportLink}]"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Syntax error due to an unexpected character in the string.
- reportLink = $"[Ginger Report Link|{reportLink}]";
+ reportLink = $"[Ginger Report Link|{reportLink}]"; // Ensure no invalid characters are present in the stringCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
GitHub Check: Build Stage / build
[failure] 383-383:
Unexpected character ''
| string reportLink = General.CreateReportLinkPerFlow(HtmlReportUrl: publishToALMConfig.HtmlReportUrl, ExecutionId: publishToALMConfig.ExecutionId, BusinessFlowInstanceGuid: bizFlow.InstanceGuid.ToString()); | ||
| \ reportLink = $"[Ginger Report Link|{reportLink}]"; | ||
|
|
||
| if (this.jiraRepObj.AddComment(ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMUserName, ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMPassword, ALMCore.DefaultAlmConfig.ALMServerURL, relevantTcRun.TestExecutionId, reportLink) == null) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The AddComment method does not appear to exist within the JiraRepositoryStd class based on the search results. This could be a critical issue if not addressed.
- Location to check:
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.csat line 385.
Analysis chain
The method AddComment might not exist in JiraRepositoryStd. This could be a critical issue if not addressed.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of `AddComment` method in `JiraRepositoryStd`.
# Test: Search for the method definition. Expect: Definition found.
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'class JiraRepositoryStd {
$$$
AddComment($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 856
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of `JiraRepositoryStd` class and `AddComment` method.
# Step 1: Verify the existence of the `JiraRepositoryStd` class.
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class JiraRepositoryStd { $$$ }'
# Step 2: Verify the existence of the `AddComment` method within the `JiraRepositoryStd` class.
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class JiraRepositoryStd { $$$ AddComment($_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
Length of output: 1297
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of `JiraRepositoryStd` class and `AddComment` method.
# Step 1: Verify the existence of the `JiraRepositoryStd` class.
rg 'class JiraRepositoryStd' --heading --line-number
# Step 2: Verify the existence of the `AddComment` method within the `JiraRepositoryStd` class.
rg 'AddComment' --heading --line-number
Length of output: 748
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DLLS/JiraRepositoryStd.dllis excluded by!**/*.dllGinger/GingerCoreNET/DLLS/OctaneRepositoryStd.dllis excluded by!**/*.dllGinger/GingerCoreNETUnitTest/Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dllis excluded by!**/*.dll
Files selected for processing (2)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml (4 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Ginger/Ginger/Run/RunSetActions/ExportResultsToALMConfigPage.xaml
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ALMLib/JIRA/Bll/JiraExportManager.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj (2 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightDriver.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj
Additional comments not posted (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Playwright/PlaywrightDriver.cs (2)
1-3: Imports added forAmdocs.Ginger.Common.Drivers.CoreDrivers.WebandAmdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.RunLib.These imports are necessary for the functionality added in this file and align with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
1-3: Review ofPlaywrightDriverclass.The class is well-structured and follows good OOP practices. The added imports are utilized in the class, which indicates good dependency management. The methods are well-documented, and the exception handling is robust, ensuring that the driver operations are reliable.
…ub.com/Ginger-Automation/Ginger into Feature/CentralizedDBReportLinkForALMs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Ginger/Ginger/DLLs/Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.dllis excluded by!**/*.dll
Files selected for processing (4)
- Ginger/Ginger/Ginger.csproj (2 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/MainWindow.xaml (2 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/MainWindow.xaml.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerRuntime/GingerRuntime.csproj (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- Ginger/Ginger/MainWindow.xaml
- Ginger/Ginger/MainWindow.xaml.cs
- Ginger/GingerRuntime/GingerRuntime.csproj
Additional comments not posted (1)
Ginger/Ginger/Ginger.csproj (1)
774-776: Switch from PackageReference to direct DLL reference forGinger.ExecuterService.Contracts.This change aligns with the project's strategy to use direct DLL references for internal dependencies, potentially to control specific versions and dependencies more tightly. Ensure that the referenced DLL is always up to date with the required version.
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores
Ginger.ExecuterService.Contracts.