Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addded try catch block for mutex exception #3888

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

AmanPrasad43
Copy link
Contributor

@AmanPrasad43 AmanPrasad43 commented Aug 30, 2024

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for unauthorized access in the collection retrieval process.
    • Improved logging for deletion operations, providing clearer feedback on success or failure.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted default success assumption for document deletion to improve accuracy.
  • Chores

    • Marked unused method DeleteCollectionItems for clarity in the codebase.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to error handling in the LiteDbConnector class, specifically in the GetCollection<T> and DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet methods. A new catch block for UnauthorizedAccessException was added to improve access error logging. The default success assumption for document deletion was altered, and additional exception handling was introduced to log errors during deletion attempts. An unused method is now clearly marked as such.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs Added error handling for UnauthorizedAccessException in GetCollection<T>; changed default result in DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet to true and added general exception logging; DeleteCollectionItems method commented out as unused.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LiteDbConnector
    participant Logger

    User->>LiteDbConnector: Request GetCollection<T>()
    LiteDbConnector->>LiteDbConnector: Try to access collection
    alt Unauthorized Access
        LiteDbConnector->>Logger: Log UnauthorizedAccessException
    else Successful Access
        LiteDbConnector-->>User: Return Collection
    end

    User->>LiteDbConnector: Request DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet()
    LiteDbConnector->>LiteDbConnector: Assume result = true
    LiteDbConnector->>LiteDbConnector: Try to delete document
    alt Deletion Failure
        LiteDbConnector->>Logger: Log General Exception
    else Deletion Success
        LiteDbConnector-->>User: Confirm Deletion
    end
Loading

Poem

🐇
In the code where rabbits play,
Changes hop in a bright new way.
Errors logged with a gentle cheer,
Access denied? We’ll make it clear!
Deletion’s dance, now smooth and bright,
Hooray for fixes, all feels just right!
🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f2c893 and 0e5a666.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (2)
Learnt from: manas-droid
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#3389
File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDB.cs:664-669
Timestamp: 2024-01-09T13:53:08.856Z
Learning: Error handling for the `RunQuery` method in `LiteDB.cs` is implemented in the calling functions, as clarified by the user.
Learnt from: manas-droid
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#3389
File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDB.cs:664-669
Timestamp: 2024-01-09T13:53:08.856Z
Learning: Error handling for the `RunQuery` method in `LiteDB.cs` is implemented in the calling functions, as clarified by the user.
Additional comments not posted (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (2)

74-77: Enhanced error handling for unauthorized access.

The addition of a specific catch block for UnauthorizedAccessException is a good practice, as it provides detailed error logging for access issues. However, consider adding more context to the error message, such as the user or process that attempted the access, if available.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 104-147: Review the change in default result assumption and approve new error handling.

Changing the default value of result to true assumes success unless an error occurs. This approach can be risky if not all paths that lead to failure are adequately checked. Ensure that this logic change is intentional and justified based on method usage.

The addition of a general exception catch block enhances error handling by logging failures during the deletion process, which is in line with the PR objectives.

The new catch block is approved, but verify the logic change for the result variable.

Verification successful

No impact from changing the default result value in DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet.

The change in the default value of result from false to true does not affect existing logic, as the return value is not used in any conditional logic or further operations in the codebase. The change is safe and should not have unintended consequences.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all usages of `DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet` to ensure the new default value of `result` does not affect existing logic.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Review all occurrences to ensure they handle the new default value correctly.
rg --type cs -A 5 $'DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet'

Length of output: 3385


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the return value of `DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet` is used in conditional logic or influences subsequent operations.

# Search for conditional logic or handling of the return value in the identified files.
rg --type cs -A 5 'DeleteDocumentByLiteDbRunSet' | rg -B 5 'if|else|return|&&|\|\|'

Length of output: 2273

Comment on lines +86 to +102
//This function is not used anywhere
//public bool DeleteCollectionItems<T>(LiteCollection<T> baseColl, Query query)
//{
// bool result = false;
// try
// {
// using (var db = new LiteDatabase(this.ConnectionString))
// {
// result = baseColl.Delete(query) > 0;
// }
// }
// catch (Exception ex)
// {
// Console.WriteLine("DeleteCollectionItems Error - " + ex.Message);
// }
// return result;
//}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider removing commented-out code.

The method DeleteCollectionItems is commented out and marked as not used. Removing unused code can help maintain a cleaner and more maintainable codebase. Confirm that this method is indeed not needed and consider removing it entirely.

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 merged commit c676240 into Releases/Beta Aug 30, 2024
7 of 9 checks passed
@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 deleted the BugFix/LiteDBTryCatchMutexIssue branch August 30, 2024 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants