Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/security headers #4842

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat/security headers #4842

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Oct 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced security with new header configurations, including X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy.
  • Improvements
    • Updated header handling to support asynchronous operations, allowing for future enhancements.

@kkatusic kkatusic self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 21, 2024 0:51am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve modifications to the next.config.js file. The headers function has been updated from a synchronous to an asynchronous function, allowing for the execution of asynchronous operations. New security headers have been added for the route /:path*, while the existing configuration for manifest.json remains unchanged but with an explicit setting for the locale property.

Changes

File Change Summary
next.config.js Updated headers function from synchronous to asynchronous. Added new headers for /:path* route. Retained existing configuration for manifest.json with locale set to false.

Poem

In the land of code, where rabbits play,
New headers hop in, brightening the day.
Asynchronous magic, a leap in the air,
Security tightened, with utmost care.
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For changes that bring us a safer frontier! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f73f735 and ec3fa78.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • next.config.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
next.config.js (1)

151-151: Unnecessary use of async in headers function


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2)

86-93: LGTM with a minor suggestion: useEffect for updating querySlug.

The useEffect hook is well-implemented, correctly waiting for the router to be ready and ensuring the slug is a string before updating querySlug.

Consider handling the edge case where slug might be an array:

useEffect(() => {
  if (router.isReady) {
    const slugValue = Array.isArray(slug) ? slug[0] : slug;
    if (typeof slugValue === 'string') {
      setQuerySlug(slugValue);
    }
  }
}, [router.isReady, slug]);

This change ensures that even if slug is unexpectedly an array, the first value is used.


112-112: Approved with suggestion: Updated Link href attribute.

The use of querySlug in the Link's href attribute is a good change, ensuring that the correct and validated slug is used for navigation.

To make the code more robust, consider handling the case where querySlug might be undefined:

<Link href={querySlug ? slugToVerification(querySlug) : '#'}>

This change ensures that even if querySlug is undefined (which shouldn't happen given the useEffect, but it's good to be safe), the Link will still render without throwing a runtime error.

next.config.js (1)

Clarified CORS and Framing Policies Configuration
Based on the verification, multiple iframe usages exist which may require app.safe.global to frame certain components. If framing by app.safe.global is intended, please update the Content-Security-Policy to allow app.safe.global as a valid frame-ancestor. Otherwise, ensure that iframe usages are necessary and secure.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 155-173: Clarify the intention behind CORS and framing policies

There seems to be a potential conflict between the CORS policy and the new framing restrictions:

  1. The Access-Control-Allow-Origin header allows access from https://app.safe.global.
  2. The new X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy headers restrict framing to the same origin.

Could you clarify the intended behavior? If the manifest needs to be accessible but not frameable by app.safe.global, the current configuration is correct. However, if framing by app.safe.global is intended, you might need to adjust the Content-Security-Policy header.

Also, consider if framing protection is necessary for a manifest.json file, as it's typically used for PWA configurations and not usually framed.

To help verify the intended behavior, you can run the following script:

This will help us understand how manifest.json is used in the project and if there are any Safe-related configurations that explain the CORS setting.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other usages of manifest.json that might be affected by these changes

# Test: Search for references to manifest.json in the codebase
echo "Searching for references to manifest.json:"
rg "manifest\.json"

# Test: Check if there are any iframe usages that might be affected
echo "Checking for iframe usages:"
rg "<iframe"

# Test: Look for any Safe-related configurations that might explain the CORS setting
echo "Checking for Safe-related configurations:"
rg "safe\.global"

Length of output: 1894

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66e0051 and 26021a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • next.config.js (1 hunks)
  • src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2)

81-81: LGTM: New state variable for query slug.

The addition of the querySlug state variable is a good approach to manage the routing logic more effectively after email verification. The typing and initialization are correct.


Line range hint 81-112: Overall assessment: Improved email verification handling.

The changes to the Verified component enhance the handling of the slug for navigation after email verification. The introduction of querySlug and the useEffect hook to manage it improves the reliability of the routing logic.

A few minor suggestions were made to further improve robustness:

  1. Handling the case where slug might be an array in the useEffect hook.
  2. Safeguarding against potential undefined querySlug in the Link component.

These changes contribute to a more stable and predictable user experience during the email verification process.

next.config.js (1)

166-173: Excellent addition of security headers!

The new X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy headers provide robust protection against clickjacking attacks. This is a great security enhancement for the /manifest.json endpoint.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26021a3 and aae420d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • next.config.js (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • next-env.d.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
next.config.js (2)

166-173: Security headers correctly implemented

The addition of the X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy headers enhances security by mitigating clickjacking attacks and controlling embedding sources. The headers are correctly configured for /manifest.json.


Line range hint 158-164: Verify the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header value

The Access-Control-Allow-Origin header is set to https://app.safe.global. Please verify that this is the intended origin and that no other origins require access to /manifest.json. If multiple origins need access, you might need to adjust the CORS configuration accordingly.

Run the following script to check for cross-origin requests to /manifest.json in the codebase:

next.config.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant