Tasmota: Add more temp devices

[atrovato]

Pull Request check-list

To ensure your Pull Request can be accepted as fast as possible, make sure to review and check all of these items:

• If your changes affects code, did your write the tests?
• Are tests passing? (npm test on both front/server)
• Is the linter passing? (npm run eslint on both front/server)
• Did you run prettier? (npm run prettier on both front/server)
• If you are adding a new features/services, did you run integration comparator? (npm run compare-translations on front)
• Did you test this pull request in real life? With real devices? If this development is a big feature or a new service, we recommend that you provide a Docker image to the community for testing before merging.
• [ ] If your changes modify the API (REST or Node.js), did you modify the API documentation? (Documentation is based on comments in code)
• [ ] If you are adding a new features/services which needs explanation, did you modify the user documentation? See the GitHub repo and the website.
• [ ] Did you add fake requests data for the demo mode (front/src/config/demo.js) so that the demo website is working without a backend? (if needed) See https://demo.gladysassistant.com.

NOTE: these things are not required to open a PR and can be done afterwards / while the PR is open.

Description of change

Allow BL09XX, DS18x20 and ESP32 temperature features from Tasmota service.
According to the subjects

• https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/probleme-ajout-sonoff-dual-r3-dans-integration-tasmota/7331/9?u=alextrovato
• https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/thr320-sonoff-tasmota-resolution-problemes/7495?u=alextrovato

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 96.77% // Head: 96.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.06% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (8edb050) compared to base (505df71).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1570      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.77%   96.70%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         654      648       -6     
  Lines        9662     9352     -310     
==========================================
- Hits         9350     9044     -306     
+ Misses        312      308       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
server/services/tasmota/lib/features/humidity.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ervices/tasmota/lib/features/device_temperature.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
server/services/tasmota/lib/features/index.js	98.38% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
...erver/services/tasmota/lib/features/temperature.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
server/utils/device.js
server/utils/constants.js
server/utils/slugify.js
server/lib/device/index.js
server/lib/index.js
server/models/device.js
... and 1 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[Pierre-Gilles]

Looks fine for me, maybe can you ask for testers on the forum?

[VonOx]

Just asking

Not using global match is for filtering device_temperature feature, right ?

Reference post: https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/thr320-sonoff-tasmota-resolution-problemes/7495/12?u=vonox

[atrovato]

I just rebase it on master.

@Pierre-Gilles I am generating an up-to-date Docker image, I will ask for testers.
@VonOx The device temp matcher is only on the ENERGY sensor BL09XX. All others are as temperature sensor (not device) and I didn't use generic pattern for now to match them all, I have to check all cases in Tasmota firmware before that.

[relativeci]

Job #517: Bundle Size — 7.02MB (0%).

3d27d12 vs ce240d4

Changed metrics (1/10)

Metric	Current	Baseline
Cache Invalidation	0%	42.34%

Changed assets by type (0/7)

No changes

---

View Job #517 full report