Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: remove duplicate-id-active #15900

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024
Merged

core: remove duplicate-id-active #15900

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

adamraine
Copy link
Member

@adamraine adamraine commented Mar 28, 2024

duplicate-id-active is deprecated in axe-core (See dequelabs/axe-core#3892):

This rule was created to catch a problem with Dragon Naturally Speaking, where if active controls like buttons shared an ID, Dragon could activate the first element with that ID, even if you asked it to activate the second. Axe reports this as a serious issue. After some testing we've discovered this problem no longer exists. So for this rule we'll deprecate and tag it the same way we're doing for duplicate-id.

Our internal review of accessibility audits does seem to contradict this a bit by saying it is a good signal. However, there were some concerns in that spreadsheet about how useful it was on page load, and since axe doesn't seem to be supporting it anymore I think it's safe to remove.

Part of #15440

@adamraine adamraine requested a review from a team as a code owner March 28, 2024 18:05
@adamraine adamraine requested review from connorjclark and removed request for a team March 28, 2024 18:05
@adamraine adamraine force-pushed the rm-dep-axe-checks branch from 9e3cab1 to 42574a8 Compare April 1, 2024 21:47
@adamraine adamraine changed the title core: remove duplicate-id-aria and duplicate-id-active core: remove duplicate-id-active Apr 1, 2024
@adamraine adamraine merged commit 7801bc4 into main Apr 1, 2024
29 checks passed
@adamraine adamraine deleted the rm-dep-axe-checks branch April 1, 2024 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants