Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add performance tuning notes to exporter readme #903

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

damemi
Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi commented Oct 21, 2024

Adds notes from #456 to the readme for performance tuning options.

Fixes #871

@damemi damemi requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 13:36
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.60%. Comparing base (4caace7) to head (4d7ab2b).
Report is 51 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #903      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.03%   63.60%   +2.56%     
==========================================
  Files          56       57       +1     
  Lines        5903     6066     +163     
==========================================
+ Hits         3603     3858     +255     
+ Misses       2143     2046      -97     
- Partials      157      162       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -297,6 +297,36 @@ underscores (eg, `service.name`), but these will still collide once all
attributes are normalized to metric labels. In this case you will need to update
the collector config above appropriately.

### Performance tuning
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these numbers specific to trace?

@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor

I've been thinking we should remove the readme from this repo, and redirect to the upstream README to have a single source of truth. WDYT?

@dashpole dashpole merged commit dcf7039 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Oct 23, 2024
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recommended span batch write size
2 participants