Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: cover more cases #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2023
Merged

test: cover more cases #69

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2023

Conversation

yuanbohan
Copy link
Contributor

@yuanbohan yuanbohan commented Apr 19, 2023

What's changed and what's your intention?

increase code coverage

Checklist

  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#33

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #69 (c988bec) into main (85d0248) will increase coverage by 5.44%.
The diff coverage is 73.07%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.53%   84.97%   +5.44%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         767      772       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          610      656      +46     
+ Misses        119       85      -34     
+ Partials       38       31       -7     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
client.go 59.09% <ø> (+12.42%) ⬆️
series.go 86.89% <62.50%> (+15.17%) ⬆️
metric.go 80.70% <75.00%> (+2.80%) ⬆️
config.go 87.23% <100.00%> (-12.77%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@yuanbohan yuanbohan merged commit 600f4fb into main Apr 19, 2023
@yuanbohan yuanbohan deleted the increase-code-coverage branch April 19, 2023 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant