-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix][Habana_main] fix guided_decode HPU failing issue #236
[Bugfix][Habana_main] fix guided_decode HPU failing issue #236
Conversation
@kzawora-intel , please help to review this PR. This is a bug fix for issue #198
|
returned tool_calls: tool_calls=[ChatCompletionMessageToolCall(id='chatcmpl-tool-af3eac9372144f959ed0df7e16cf5da4', function=Function(arguments='{ "location": "Boston, MA", "unit": "fahrenheit" }', name='get_current_weather'), type='function')]) test script as below import asyncio, os, sys
import openai
from pathlib import Path
VLLM_PATH = os.path.join(Path(__file__).parent.parent, "vllm")
VLLM_PATH = os.path.join(Path(__file__).parent.parent, "vllm", "tests")
sys.path.append(VLLM_PATH)
from utils import RemoteOpenAIServer
"""Path to root of the vLLM repository."""
async def test_named_tool_use(client: openai.AsyncOpenAI, model_name, input, tools, tool_choice):
# non-streaming
chat_completion = await client.chat.completions.create(
model=model_name,
messages=input,
max_tokens=1000,
tools=tools,
tool_choice=tool_choice)
message = chat_completion.choices[0].message
print(f"Message: {message}")
def test_multiple_sampling_params():
model_name = "meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B"
args = [
"--max-model-len", "8192",
#"--enforce-eager",
]
with RemoteOpenAIServer(model_name, args) as remote_server:
client_inst = remote_server.get_async_client()
input = [{"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather like in Boston today?"}]
tools = [{
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "get_current_weather",
"description": "Get the current weather in a given location",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"location": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The city and state, e.g. San Francisco, CA",
},
"unit": {"type": "string", "enum": ["celsius", "fahrenheit"]},
},
"required": ["location"],
},
}
}]
tool_choice = {'function': {'name': 'get_current_weather'}}
asyncio.run(test_named_tool_use(client_inst, model_name, input, tools, tool_choice=tool_choice))
if __name__ == "__main__":
print("VLLM_PATH is ", VLLM_PATH)
test_multiple_sampling_params() |
751a9fa
to
8476ea9
Compare
Signed-off-by: Chendi.Xue <chendi.xue@intel.com>
8476ea9
to
8046d81
Compare
Thanks, @tae-su-kim , I didn't notice your PR, it looks great. Either 226 or this PR works for me, I hope to make vllm-fork to support Agent tool_calls ASAP so it can be utilized in OPEA. |
@xuechendi Great! We recently observed unexpected throughput degradation with guided_decode and submitted fix for it (commit 6d57c18 and #226 (comment)). If you are interested, please check it out. It would be really helpful if you could cross-check latency improvement with the test cases for tool_call and llama-3.1-8B. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@michalkuligowski This feature seriously needs commit 6d57c18. Without it, e2e throughput degrades a lot. Please review #226 also. |
@tae-su-kim hi, I reviewed the #226, it has unused imported function and ruff code analysis fails on that |
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ def __call__(self, input_ids: List[int], | |||
-math.inf, | |||
device=scores.device) | |||
mask[allowed_tokens] = 0 | |||
scores.add_(mask) | |||
scores = scores.add(mask) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just curious, what's the difference here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be no difference in result, however, 'add_' is executing in_place, while 'add' will return a tensor.
From my test, using 'add_' leads to "RuntimeError: synNodeCreateWithId failed for node: strided_insert with synStatus 1 [Invalid argument]. ", replacing with 'add' fixed above issue
FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE
FIX ##198
After this change, we can see tool_calls can be returned successfully
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!