Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve ambiguity of prov:used #161

Open
vcharpenay opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Resolve ambiguity of prov:used #161

vcharpenay opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
ontology Related to the ontology itself scenario Concerns a motivating scenario

Comments

@vcharpenay
Copy link
Contributor

In SHACL specifications for actions/behaviors (see #116), prov:used is a relation between a time interval (the action that occurs) and a Web form (that was filled in for the action to start). The relation between the action and the form should be more specific than what is provided in the PROV model.

In the crud-actions scenario, I suggest to introduce the hmas:initiated property (<someForm> hmas:initiated <someAction>). But the relation is likely to be more specific.

@vcharpenay vcharpenay added question Further information is requested ontology Related to the ontology itself scenario Concerns a motivating scenario and removed question Further information is requested labels Jun 28, 2023
@DrLeturc DrLeturc added this to the V3.2.2.1 milestone Oct 6, 2023
@FabienGandon FabienGandon removed this from the V3.2.2.1 milestone Nov 30, 2023
@FabienGandon
Copy link
Contributor

we need a dedicated heartbeat meeting with @vcharpenay to discuss that issue ; we keep prov:used until then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ontology Related to the ontology itself scenario Concerns a motivating scenario
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants