You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Also, it may be more accurate to set it to 3, as the Code Review's documentation states:
The tool can end with following return codes:
- 0: processing completed successfully
there are no code review rule violations
the generated code review output is valid
the (optional) post-processing script executed successfully
- 1: processing completed successfully
the most severe review violation is a recommendation (4)
the generated code review output is valid
the (optional) post-processing script executed successfully
- 2: processing completed successfully
the most severe review violation is a warning (8)
the generated code review output is valid
the (optional) post-processing script executed successfully
- 3: processing completed successfully
the most severe review violation is a severe violation (12)
the generated code review output is valid
the (optional) post-processing script executed successfully
- 4: processing did not complete for one or more files
the most severe review violation is a syntax error (15)
the generated code review output is valid, but excludes
results for the file(s) with a syntax error
the (optional) post-processing script executed successfully
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In https://github.com/IBM/dbb/blob/main/Pipeline/RunIDZCodeReview/RunCodeReview.groovy#L115, the max acceptable return code shouldn't be hard-coded, it should externalized in the codeReview.properties file.
Also, it may be more accurate to set it to 3, as the Code Review's documentation states:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: