Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require scipy<1.13.0 for pypesto[pymc] #1360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dweindl
Copy link
Member

@dweindl dweindl commented Apr 4, 2024

See #1354.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.09%. Comparing base (e0bec86) to head (d8ed4f6).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #1360       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    58.40%   46.09%   -12.31%     
============================================
  Files          157      157               
  Lines        12871    12871               
============================================
- Hits          7517     5933     -1584     
- Misses        5354     6938     +1584     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dweindl dweindl marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 06:35
@dweindl dweindl merged commit 5879755 into ICB-DCM:develop Apr 5, 2024
18 checks passed
@dweindl dweindl deleted the fix_1354 branch April 5, 2024 06:35
This was referenced Apr 9, 2024
dweindl added a commit to dweindl/pyPESTO that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
dweindl added a commit to dweindl/pyPESTO that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
dweindl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants