You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Section NumberIdentify the most specific section number the issue occurs (e.g. 4.1.2)
2:3.91
IssueDescribe your issue. Don't write a book, but do include enough to indicate what you see as a problem.
ITI-91 essentially provides a mechanism to synchronize two directories via a history operation. Some deployments might prefer a pub-sub model whereby the consumer subscribes to the supplier and the supplier notifies the consumer of updates in real time.
Proposed ChangePropose a resolution to your issue (e.g., suggested new wording or description of a way to address the issue). The committee might simply accept your suggested text. Even if they don't, it gives a good sense of what you are looking for. Leaving this blank means you can't imagine how to resolve the issue, which makes it easier for the committee to admit they can't imagine how to resolve it either and leave it unresolved.
Consider a subscription model based on the FHIR Subscription Resource. This might be better left until the move to FHIR R5.
Priority:
High: Important issue where there is major issue to be resolved. Requires discussion and debate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Section Number Identify the most specific section number the issue occurs (e.g. 4.1.2)
2:3.91
Issue Describe your issue. Don't write a book, but do include enough to indicate what you see as a problem.
ITI-91 essentially provides a mechanism to synchronize two directories via a history operation. Some deployments might prefer a pub-sub model whereby the consumer subscribes to the supplier and the supplier notifies the consumer of updates in real time.
Proposed Change Propose a resolution to your issue (e.g., suggested new wording or description of a way to address the issue). The committee might simply accept your suggested text. Even if they don't, it gives a good sense of what you are looking for. Leaving this blank means you can't imagine how to resolve the issue, which makes it easier for the committee to admit they can't imagine how to resolve it either and leave it unresolved.
Consider a subscription model based on the FHIR Subscription Resource. This might be better left until the move to FHIR R5.
Priority:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: