Implement dpnp.allclose() for a device without fp64 aspect #1536
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html |
antonwolfy
force-pushed
the
allclose_no_fp64
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ca7a676
to
f518ead
Compare
antonwolfy
force-pushed
the
allclose_no_fp64
branch
from
f518ead
to
ea464f5
Compare
antonwolfy
requested review from
vlad-perevezentsev,
npolina4 and
vtavana
and removed request for
vlad-perevezentsev and
npolina4
vlad-perevezentsev
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2023
6 tasks
This was referenced Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The PR proposes to provide support of
dpnp.allclosefunction for a device without fp64 aspect.Additionally, use cases with
nanandinfvalues in input arrays are handling properly now.