Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

actionlint: provision it in Nix shell, and use the same in CI #767

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

smelc
Copy link
Contributor

@smelc smelc commented May 15, 2024

Changelog

- description: |
    actionlint: provision it in Nix shell, and use the same in CI
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  - refactoring    # QoL changes
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

How to trust this PR

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@smelc smelc marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2024 12:53
@smelc smelc requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2024 12:53
@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/use-actionlint-from-nixpkgs branch from c10acd8 to 41c0586 Compare May 15, 2024 12:56
@smelc smelc enabled auto-merge May 15, 2024 13:21
@smelc smelc disabled auto-merge May 15, 2024 14:29
@smelc smelc merged commit 6c7039d into main May 15, 2024
19 of 21 checks passed
@smelc smelc deleted the smelc/use-actionlint-from-nixpkgs branch May 15, 2024 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants