content types become taxonomies

[seth-shaw-unlv]

GitHub Issue:

• #902: Convert controlled_access_terms config into a feature
• #912: controlled_access_terms content types as taxonomies
• #915: Fix controlled_access_terms TypedRelations validateValues

What does this Pull Request do?

This PR incorporates @whikloj's work moving the configs into a feature, a bug-fix for the TypedRelations field, and turning the Agents and Subjects into taxonomy vocabularies.

How should this be tested?

From a clean install:

• Apply the PR
• Enabling the main Controlled Access Terms module will make the TypedRelation and AuthorityLink available.
• Enabling the Default Configuration sub-module will install the configs to create taxonomy vocabularies for Corporate Bodies, Persons, Families, Geographic Locations, and Subjects.
• Creating a term for any of them should not cause errors.
• Also, adding a TypedRelation field and then updating the default available relation types shouldn't WSOD.

Additional Notes:

I neglected to add a typed relation field before issuing the PR. One will come shortly.

This PR supersedes #6 and #7.

Interested parties

@Islandora-CLAW/committers (esp. @whikloj and @Natkeeran)

[Natkeeran]

@seth-shaw-unlv

I am at the last step. Adding TypedRelation field to Repository Item. I choose Taxonomy term for "Type of item to reference". In the Reference Type I choose "Geographic Location". I am wondering what to put into "Available Relations"?

[seth-shaw-unlv]

I haven't looked into relationship predicates for Geo, just Agents. For the Object-Agent relators we are pulling our list from MARC and it looks like:

relators:abr|Abridger (abr)
relators:act|Actor (act)
relators:adp|Adapter (adp)
relators:rcp|Addressee (rcp)
relators:anl|Analyst (anl)
relators:anm|Animator (anm)
relators:ann|Annotator (ann)

(and on for ~260 more options).

For the purposes of testing, you could just use those.

[dannylamb]

@Natkeeran If you're ok with this, please feel free to merge.

[Natkeeran]

@seth-shaw-unlv @dannylamb Looks good.

For geography, I assume it would be something like birthPlace, placeOfPublication etc? That is for another discussion.