Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update L201.AgHAtoCL.csv #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020
Merged

Update L201.AgHAtoCL.csv #69

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

kvcalvin
Copy link
Contributor

Use weighted average of HAtoCL ratio

@kvcalvin kvcalvin requested a review from abigailsnyder August 20, 2020 15:21
Copy link
Contributor

@abigailsnyder abigailsnyder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this PR is only the addition of the new csv file, I'm assuming the new file was produced correctly

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #69 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #69   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.80%   79.80%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1827     1827           
=======================================
  Hits         1458     1458           
  Misses        369      369           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 11751ae...95dfb4f. Read the comment docs.

@kvcalvin kvcalvin merged commit 25e4476 into master Aug 20, 2020
@kvcalvin kvcalvin deleted the Fix-HAtoCL-Ratios branch August 20, 2020 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants