-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
external changes to bib file make JabRef go mad #3498
Comments
I have the same problem. |
I can reproduce this as far as step 7. When I go for "discard", JabRef just closes as desired. Chances are this is related to the last big changes to the diff functionality in #3353 Another observation: If I hit save twice subsequently in step 4, then the library will be saved and everything will work as expected. |
Yes, this bug was probably introduced by my refactoring. Sorry for that! |
Unfortuantely, jabref 4.0 does not work for large bibfile due to the memory
issues, and I am finding the development branch increasingly unstable - I
have had to move back to jabref 3.8 on all my machines. I would recommend
leaving links to 3.8 on your downloads page - neither 4.0 nor the dev
branch are ready for production use (ie myself with a 5000 citations and
use jabref/lyx 2-6 hours per day). It turned out easy to save my groups
back into 3.8 by just changing the key word in @comment.
…On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Tobias Diez ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, this bug was probably introduced by my refactoring. Sorry for that!
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3498 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABmNkXUTFRCYkBOqiKNRmQ0OmBtvUNkeks5s-bMOgaJpZM4Q7GtQ>
.
--
W. Bentley MacLeod
Columbia University in the City of New York
wbentleymacleod.wikischolars.columbia.edu
|
@lenhard I tried clicking save twice, thrice, many times. It will still give me an error message and I have to kill the application. |
@lenhard The bug is still there in the current version. |
@j0hannes Unfortunately as the master builds are not up to date, did you try to run the latest master from source? (git fetch && git pull ) |
I am using source version but apparently that fix wasn't included in the version I compiled while the other fix targeting the missing search box was. Now it's working as expected, thanks 👍 |
This bug is still present in the latest stable version of JabRef, 4.3. |
JabRef version 4.1-dev
Steps to reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: