Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add parser test #11726

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2024
Merged

Add parser test #11726

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

calixtus
Copy link
Member

@calixtus calixtus commented Sep 7, 2024

Fixes https://github.com/JabRef/jabref-issue-melting-pot/issues/446

Mandatory checks

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2024

The build for this PR is no longer available. Please visit https://builds.jabref.org/main/ for the latest build.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9fc4ae5 Sep 7, 2024
25 checks passed
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the add-parser-test branch September 7, 2024 22:54
@koppor koppor added the jabcon label Sep 8, 2024
leaf-soba pushed a commit to leaf-soba/jabref that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants